On Apr 18, 2:18=A0pm, "Susan Maneck" <sman...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote to Paul:
>
> > I have not seen/attended Book Two, so I cannot comment. =A0However, I
> > have to say in all blunt frankness that I was not overall favorably
> > impressed with Book One (which I attended every session and
> > participated fully in).
>
> If it is any consoltation, Book Two is better. But for you I would
> recommend skipping to Book Four.
>
Which is better or worse is a matter of taste of course. Just for
balance I have done books 1 and 2. I don't like either but I think
book 2 is much worse than book 1.
I know a number of people who like book 4 very much - my wife for
instance. What I've seen of it hasn't really impressed me but maybe
it works better in practice.
