Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ

On Jul 23, 1:03=A0pm, "Fred A Stover" <fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Dr. House" <hsot...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:80235253-d2fc-4882-8cbd-5f6ff7b981e3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 13, 1:53am, "Fred A Stover" <fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Dr. House" <hsot...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:8b100856-b0ca-43bf-b3f2-c93ab98bdd55@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Jul 10, 12:08am, "Fred A Stover" <fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
>
> > > "Dr. House" <hsot...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >
>news:e91ff96a-c34d-4ca9-a1d5-ffffea5c1060@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On Jul 7, 5:29pm, "Fred A Stover" <fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > [...]
>
> > > > > As you've already been shown, the young earth measures are
> > > > > scientific
> > > > > derived from observations in one dimension of time, the
dimension=
 in
> > > > > which
> > > > > we determine age.
>
> > > > =3D I have not been show any such thing.
>
> > > > Wrong.
>
> > > / Fred, there is a huge difference between you showing something and
> > > / makeing an unsup****ted claim. You keep claiming that m-theory
means
> > > / datting methods are all wrong but so far you have shown nothing in
=
any
> > > / of the threads I have read.
>
> > > But I have.
>
> > =3D No Fred. You keep repeating your conclusion. You have not provided
> > =3D an argument to sup****t that conclusion. When asked for said
argumen=
t
> > =3D you claim you have provided it and then repeat your conclusion. It
=
is
> > =3D almost as if you don't understand the difference.
>
> > Incredible!!!!!! Simple fact, which requires no conclusion.

M-theory distorting dating methods is not simple fact.  You have not
shown this.  You have not sup****ted it.

> > The recorded
> > obsevations of the different events, such as the changes in pressure
in
> > oil
> > reserves measured over time, or the changes in gravity over time are
> > simple
> > facts.

These facts do not sup****t your conclusion that m-theory proves
distortions in dating methods.

> > That two significantly different measures are the result of measuring
t=
wo
> > different things. Is a given. Your right hand isn't your left hand,
3<>=
5,
> > and your not knowing that is why I dismiss you as worth any time..

That "I don't know it" is a lie you spread to discredit me.  You act
like getting a different measure for different things proves something
you are saying when in fact it doesn't.


House