Re: Gabriel's Lie #7 - The Evolutionists Failure to Show a Change

On Jul 18, 6:59 pm, Gabriel <gabriel_bapt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:38:46 -0700 (PDT), Budikka666
>
> <budik...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> : On Jul 15, 2:33 pm, Gabriel <gabriel_bapt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> : [snipped previous]
> : > : Lie  #1 -http://tinyurl.com/6rsdrv
> : > : Lie  #2 -http://tinyurl.com/5zl5b8
> : > : Lie  #3 -http://tinyurl.com/5vf836
> : > : Lie  #4 -http://tinyurl.com/68bmab
> : > : Lie  #5 -http://tinyurl.com/6ra6yz
> : > : Lie  #6 -http://tinyurl.com/6eg39k
> : > : Lie  #7 -http://tinyurl.com/68bmab
> : > : Lie  #8 -http://tinyurl.com/6yk6bo
> : > : Lie  #9 -http://tinyurl.com/5gnbyc
> : > : Lie #10 -http://tinyurl.com/5wrgaa
> : > : Lie #11 -http://tinyurl.com/6g69jc
> : > : Lie #12 -http://tinyurl.com/6kyv64
> : > :
> : > : Twelve LIES, Gallus Gabriel.  Not one of them refuted.  Not even a
> : > : pretense that you can intelligently address them.  Nothing but
> : > : avoidance, evasion, lies, straw men and dishonesty.

> : Lie #2: You insist that the definition of evolution includes that it
> : must be directly seen by human eyes over millions of years or it's a
> : lie.  That's your lie #2.
>
> So we can say that God created the animals becuase it's
> do***ented and it doesn't have to directly observed, or testable
> or verifiable that this actually took place?

How can the Bible writers *do***ent* it if it wasn't directly observed
by them?

How do you determine if a Bible writer is making it up, writing an
allegory, or inspired by a god?

Why is there no science whatsoever that sup****ts the bible creation
story?

If we have two stories and no way other than available evidence to
tell which is the truth and which is fiction, what do we use to make
that determination?

Budikka