Re: Flood Evidence Found Using Google Earth

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:58:31 -0400, Gabriel
<gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:

>On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 03:54:46 +0100, "Smiler" <Smiler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>: 
>: "Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>: news:r46i6413651kgm4fm6omvhciak2r37olmr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:59:40 +0100, "Smiler"
>: > <Smiler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>: >
>: > :
>: > : "Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>: > : news:k5m864lvp5umds68nsm1be43m4a3lpg97v@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>: > : > On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:17:39 +0100, "Smiler"
>: > : > <Smiler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>: > : >
>: > : > :
>: > : > : "Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>: > : > : news:6e5o5497ev4s8i36f89bnhv4t76fvb00im@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>: > : > : > On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:31:09 GMT, Gregory A Greenman
>: > : > : > <see@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>: > : > : >
>: > : > : > : In article <66tg44pqbgcnbpjhebau7jg3lq98c7horr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Gabriel
>: > : > : > : <gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> declared...
>: > : > : > : > On Sat, 31 May 2008 04:24:02 GMT, Gregory A Greenman
>: > : > : > : > <see@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>: > : > : > : >
>: > : > : > : > : Why is the fact that occasionally people survive
falling 
>: > great
>: > : > : > : > : distances evidence for your god?
>: > : > : > : >
>: > : > : > : > One of *many* evidences for God. Such a thing defies
natural
>: > : > : > : > explanation why a person can live from such a deadly
fall.
>: > : > : > :
>: > : > : > :
>: > : > : > :
>: > : > : > : Actually, this is an interesting topic to bring up as
evidence
>: > : > : > : for god. One of the complaints that creationists often make

>: > about
>: > : > : > : evolution is that it takes god out of the picture.
Rationalists
>: > : > : > : then point out that all science is based of naturalistic
>: > : > : > : assumptions. If you don't make that assumption, then you
really
>: > : > : > : can't get any further than to say "goddidit" as you have
done
>: > : > : > : here.
>: > : > : >
>: > : > : > Actually this is not true at all. We are still perfectly
capable
>: > : > : > of scientifically investigating God's creation just like
always.
>: > : > : > Adaptation of animals. That bacteria produces bacteria that
has
>: > : > : > changed but is still bacteria and perhaps is now more
resistant
>: > : > : > remains perfectly intact, as does the rest of actual science.
>: > : > : >
>: > : > : > It's only in trying to introduce the imagined, unobservable,
>: > : > : > untestable, unverifiable belief that this leads to every
single
>: > : > : > living thing evolved from a common ancestor that they've gone
off
>: > : > : > the dishonest, atheistic deep end in an attempt to reject
God.
>: > : > : > Moreso when they try to dishonestly claim these imagined,
>: > : > : > unobservable, unverfiable, untestable beliefs are scientific
>: > : > : > fact, when they aren't even scientific at all.
>: > : > : >
>: > : > :
>: > : > : Would you, therefore, reject any medicine that has been
devoloped 
>: > using
>: > : > : these "unscientific" facts of evolution?
>: > : >
>: > : > Adaptation of bacteria and other such things remains perfectly
>: > : > intact and completely independent of the religious beliefs
>: > : > dishonestly associated with them that claims molecules to man
>: > : > evolution is true as well.
>: > : >
>: > : > We already know bacteria adapts, and rejecting molecules to man
>: > : > evolution does not change the usefulness of this knowledge to
>: > : > create new medicines, as we don't reject bacteria adapting, as so
>: > : > on.
>: > : >
>: > :
>: > : Adaption = evolution.
>: >
>: > No, that's just a blur of what you believe with what we know
>: > takes place to be the exact same thing, and then trying to make
>: > your beliefs true by association.
>: >
>: > Bacteria adapting but remaining bacteria
>: 
>: Apes adapting to become man, but remaining mammals, remaining apes.
>
>Show one such observation of what you believe.
>Show where it's ever been observed that populations of apes
>produced, over generations, animals that are clearly not apes
>(let alone a man). 

Every single human on earth is a great ape.

>Show where it's ever been observed that populations of animals
>that are not apes produced, over generations, animals that are
>now apes. 

The observations are in the historical and genetic evidence. You, as a
committed liar, a wicked servant who buried his talent rather than
learn, are unwilling to admit that such evidence exists, but your lies
do not change the facts. You mock God with your lies. That is your
choice.

>And so on. Such a thing has never once been observed in the
>entire recorded history of the human race. Such a thing is not
>testable, and such a thing is not verifiable. I.e., it's not
>science, just an imagined belief.

More of your lies and intentional ignorance shows us that you hate what
is known to us, that you hate the fact that we know you teach false
doctrines, that you mock God and call Him a liar.
 
>: >is not even remotely the
>: > same thing as molecules to man evolution you believe in which is
>: > unobservable, untestable and unverifiable (i.e., not science).
>: 
>: Liar.
>
>You have a chance to prove it, as you keep saying that but never
>back it up. :-(
>
>: All three have been done.
>
>Still waiting for anyone to show it. You'd be the first.

You know you lied, again.