Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ

Top posting to separate the reply.

Likewise I don't assume all accounts aren't true. I don't see conflict.
All 
four are true.

Luke's account has him speaking and does show that He didn't defend
Himself 
by the absence of a defenxe in the full context of scripture which tells
us 
he won't.

John does not have Jesus defending himself.  See the previous post.


-- 
His,

More @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.selah-tx.net

ho echon ota akoueto                             Preparing the way of the 
Lord
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  Verily I say unto you, Whosoever
  shall not receive the kingdom of God
  as a little child, he shall not enter therein.
                                            (Mark 10:15)
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

<)))))))><


"Dr. House" <hsototr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:3df8d8ae-4fe1-49aa-9562-3c6f8293d3dc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Jun 26, 1:08pm, "Fred A Stover" <fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

[...]
> >> This is a rather large discrepancy between John's account and that of
> >> Matt and Mark. In your opinion which ones, if any, are false?
>
> Why would you assume any account was false simply because they included
> different details?

That doesn't answer my question.  My answer to yours would be: I
wouldn't.

However the issue is not that they include different details but
rather that they include what seems to be conflicting details.

> They all show he spoke and that he didn't defend
> himself.

Yes, all of them show that _except_ for the ones that don't - Luke and
John.  Luke doesn't say one way or the other and John has Jesus
defending himself.


House

Because some of the . . . er . . . more delicate individuals were
frightened by the Jayne Cobb reference.  And no, I'm not a real Doctor
but Hugh Laurie plays one on TV.   ;-)