Re: Flood Evidence Found Using Google Earth

"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:kc9m54l15ni398qd1c0fg8tsa3ik6iijlu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:48:48 +0100, "Smiler"
> <Smiler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> :
> : "Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> : news:obge54tf072b6m4akrj22ugd62k5uvvs4g@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : > On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 00:07:03 +0100, "Smiler" <Smiler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> : > wrote:
> : >
> : > :
> : > : "Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> : > : news:igil441fg7r8ce72es2m488akj9g30lcjt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : > : > On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 05:37:49 +0100, "Smiler"
<Smiler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> : > : > wrote:
> : > : >
> : > : > :
> : > : > : "Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> : > : > : news:lrgg44pcr1t7ti13n2ph4lcf51l9nkg0ok@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : > : > : > On Tue, 27 May 2008 04:15:05 +0100, "Smiler"
> : > : > : > <Smiler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > : "Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> : > : > : > : news:j8ik3415fo5am0mck9u8j1j351fq6bvvn3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : > : > : > : > On Sun, 25 May 2008 21:00:04 GMT, Kelsey Bjarnason
> : > : > : > : > <kbjarnason@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> : > : > : > : >
> : > : > : > : > : [snips]
> : > : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > : > : On Fri, 23 May 2008 21:34:20 -0400, Gabriel wrote:
> : > : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > : > : > : So you say.  Do you think you could, oh, present 
> some?
> : > : > : > : > : >
> : > : > : > : > : > Just did.
> : > : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > : > : No, you put forth a pack of unfounded, baseless and
> : > unsup****ted
> : > : > : > : > : assertions.  You were asked for *evidence*.
> : > : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > : > : You *do* understand there is a difference between
simply
> : > : > asserting
> : > : > : > "X is
> : > : > : > : > : real" and actually providing evidence for it, right?
> : > : > : > : >
> : > : > : > : > You don't seem to understand that ignoring evidence 
> doesn't
> : > make
> : > : > : > : > it any less real. Since it's clear you'll just delete 
> evidence
> : > : > : > : > when shown to you in abundant detail, it's also clear 
> truth is
> : > : > : > : > not what you're after. Meanwhile the abundant evidence 
> remains
> : > : > : > : > for all to see.
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > : Your "evidence" is the equivalent of:
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > : Icebergs are evidence for coconut trees.
> : > : > : > : Underwear is evidence for Mountains.
> : > : > : > : Penguins are evidence for Nuns.
> : > : > : > : Umbrellas are evidence for black holes.
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : > Not at all. But what you just wrote is unfortunately
evidence 
> of
> : > : > : > how dishonest you try to be. :-(
> : > : > : >
> : > : > :
> : > : > : No. I'm just mimicking your dishonesty.
> : > : >
> : > : > Actually you're not mimicking, you're just being dishonest.
> : > : > You're instead dishonestly turning it into something else to
> : > : > avoid looking at the evidence now that you can no longer
complain
> : > : > that it wasn't given to you.
> : > :
> : > : NO EVIDENCE WAS GIVEN TO US, LIAR.
> : >
> : > Actually it was. You completely ignored it. Here's the reply I
> : > gave you that you ignored.
> : >
> : > On Thu, 22 May 2008 01:28:33 +0100, "Smiler"
> : > <Smiler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> : >
> : > :
> : > : "Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> : > : news:qtv83411268q4pueb4n1dkk0gmrk8mcina@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : > : > On Sun, 18 May 2008 18:45:58 GMT, Gregory A Greenman
> : > : > <see@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> : > : >
> : > : > : In article <hdq0349ha84um8u5i8kj5v8bobpn2e57r8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Gabriel
> : > : > : <gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> declared...
> : > : > : > On Fri, 16 May 2008 01:26:37 -0500, "towelie"
> : > : > : > <bugoNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : > : I've asked many of the same questions to fundie xers, and 
> they
> : > could
> : > : > only
> : > : > : > : reply "Gawd can do anything."   If that is so, why didn't
he
> : > just
> : > : > make the
> : > : > : > : "sinners" stop being sinners instead of flooding the
entire
> : > earth?
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : > God could take away free will and make us robots. Clearly He

> does
> : > : > : > not want robots to wor****p Him, but people with free will to
> : > : > : > choose to wor****p Him (and unfortunately choose to reject 
> Him).
> : > : > :
> : > : > :
> : > : > : Thank you for your explanation. God could have come down out
of
> : > : > : heaven and shown all the evil sinners the error of their ways,
> : > : >
> : > : > They knew everything they needed to know. They saw Noah building
> : > : > the arc for decades. Did that change their choice? No. They
> : > : > continued in their wicked ways.
> : > : >
> : > : > What about you? You know everything you need to know. Do you
> : > : > change your ways? You know every person is appointed to die,
> : > :
> : > : Everybody dies, no appointment neccessary.
> : > :
> : > :  and
> : > : > then face the judgment.
> : > :
> : > : Your extra-biblical evidence for this supposed judgement is?
> : > :
> : > : >Does that make you change your ways?
> : > : >
> : > : > You are willingly choosing
> : > :
> : > : No choice involved, until you present extra-biblical evidence for 
> the
> : > : existence of your god.
> : >
> : > If you are honestly seeking such evidence, rather than waiting to
> : > hear so you can instead just try to shoot them down, then this
> : > would be a start towards you finding truth. I suggest you
> : > consider reading:
> : > "The Case for a Creator" by Lee Strobel
> : > (ignoring for the moment what others tell you to believe about
> : > that book to give you a chance to _decide for yourself_) - as Lee
> : > was a skeptic about Christians, and went looking into their
> : > claims to rebuke them, and ended up finding the truth.
> : >
> : > First of all, no evidence is 'objective', as the observer brings
> : > his/her own world view to bear on it for interpreting it.
> :
> : So a dented car is not objective evidence for a 'conflict in space and

> time'
> : (a crash)?
> : A dead body is not objective evidence for that person having once been
> : alive?
> : Your street is not objective evidence that your street exists?
>
> You're right. Just like creation is evidence that there was a
> Creator.
>

That is not objective, only your opinion.
The universe is evidence that the universe exists, but is not evidence for

any god(s).
Is underwear evidence for mountains?

> :
> : <snip rest of bull****>
>
> As I said: the evidence is given to you.

It never has been, and never will be.
You have no objective evidence.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279