Re: Flood Evidence Found Using Google Earth

"adman" <72545@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:Kw5Xj.66833$%15.22768@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Smiler" <Smiler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:dj4Xj.17909$Nq2.12615@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |
> | "Pastor Dave" <ananias917_@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> | news:iv0p24pfjdmdg92d2jk8thp5h3o5fn28g5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | > On Thu, 15 May 2008 18:10:20 GMT, "Pink Freud"
> | > <somewhere@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> spake thusly:
> | >
> | >
> | >>"adman" <72545@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> | >>
> | >>> What really makes this astounding is that other geological
> researchers,
> | >>> using Google Earth, found characteristic features of a giant
tsunami
> in
> | >>> the
> | >>> Indian Ocean. The features are called chevrons, enormous deposits
of
> | >>> sediment pointing radially back to a common center. Analysis of
> | >>> satellite
> | >>> sea-surface data led to the discovery of a crater ("Burckle
Crater")
> | >>> that
> | >>> seems to be about the right age, 5000 years or so. The crater
would
> have
> | >>> created a tsunami with "waves 600 feet high" and deposited "25
feet 
> of
> | >>> rain
> | >>> globally".
> | >>>
> | >>>
>
http://wavespace.info/archives/3-Flood-Evidence-Found-Using-Google-Earth.html
> | >>>
> | >>> Is there no wonder there are hundres of flood stories from around 
> the
> | >>> world?
> | >>
> | >>Wow. That's incredible.
> | >>
> | >>Can you see Noah on Google Earth too?
> | >
> | > And this is the best the evolutionists can do,
> | > when presented with the facts!  And yet,
> | > they think that somehow, "sarcasm = proof".
> | >
> |
> | Ok, you want a proper refutation, here goes.
> |
> | Your bible states that, in the supposed worldwide flood, every
mountain
> was
> | covered by water.
> | Please explain how a 600 ft tidal wave and 25 ft of rain (=625ft)
could
> | cover Mount Everest (at 29,029 ft it's 47 times higher than 625ft).
> | Your bible claims that everyone, apart from the supposed Noah and his
> | family, was drowned by this flood.
> | Please explain who survived to write these 'over 300' stories.
> |
> | If you claim that 'every mountain' wasn't covered, then your bible
lies.
> | If you claim that not 'everyone' was drowned and some lived to tell
the
> | tale, then your bible lies.
> |
> | If your bible lies, why should we believe a single word of it?
> |
> | I await your explanation, but I won't be holding my breath.
> |
> | Smiler,
> | The godless one
> | a.a.# 2279
>
> Incorrect
>
> The mountain ranges were nothing like we see today.
>

Where did you get that from?
The bible certainly doesn't say that, so what were they like?

Let's *assume* that Everest *was* only 625 ft high at the time of the 
supposed flood, approx 5000 years ago.
Height now, 29,029ft - Height then, 625 ft = Difference, 28,404 ft =
340848 
inches.
Increase in height per year 340,848 / 5000 = 68.1696 inches.
Don't you think someone would have noticed that it was growing at nearly 6

ft per year?
Since Everest was first conquered in 1952 it has grown by over 312 feet
and 
nobody has noticed????
Damn, you *are* completely stupid, aren't you.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279