On Sat, 10 May 2008 11:04:13 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>On Fri, 09 May 2008 23:50:46 GMT, "Robert Weldon"
><rweldon.spamblock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Gabriel" <gabriel_baptist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:tol9245oreo228fueur6fvtj7uuf5ksq1q@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Fri, 09 May 2008 17:27:26 -0400, Bible Bob
>>> <biblebob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>> : On Thu, 8 May 2008 20:22:50 -0700 (PDT), rogue
<rogue719@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> : wrote:
>>> :
>>> : >On May 9, 2:33 am, Budikka666 <budik...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> : >> www.nature.com/newsreveals that the platypus genome has now been
>>> : >> sequenced.
>>> : >>
>>> : >> This wasn't done by praying, or by divine revelation. It wasn't
>>> : >> revealed in the Bible or any other ancient religious text.
>>> : >>
>>> : >> Nope, it was done by the hard work of scientists the world over,
many
>>> : >> of whom no doubt share Gabriel's faith (although not his
pig-ignorant
>>> : >> practice of it)http://tinyurl.com/4xfj7r
>>> : >> "Monotreme's genome shares features with mammals, birds and
>>> reptiles."
>>> : >>
>>> : >> That's just what the Theory of Evolution expects to find in such
an
>>> : >> organism - an organism which is ancestrally at a pivotal point in
>>> : >> evolution - ought to have a mixed up genome.
>>> : >>
>>> : >> Now how could this be if it was designed, by a perfect being,
>>> : >> literally from the ground up?
>>> : >>
>>> : >> Clearly the platypus evolved. It wasn't designed, unless the
>>> designer
>>> : >> was a moron.
>>> : >>
>>> : >> Budikka
>>> : >
>>> : >And lets face it, only a designer who was a moron would put the
>>> : >urethra in men running through the prostate, and how is that having
>>> : >testicles OUTSIDE the body working out? ;-) I know when I've
taken a
>>> : >whack there it didn't do much for my faith in Intelligent Design.
>>> :
>>> :
>>> : Rogue,
>>> :
>>> : Only a moron would consider that a platypus evolved from another
genus
>>> : without adequate physical evidence. Shared DNA is proof of nothing
>>> : other than animals are similar. If the monotreme shares genome
>>> : features with mamals, birds, and reptiles; so what. It could have
>>> : originated that way. Has any scientist observed a reptile, bird, or
>>> : mamal evolve into a platypus? Nope.
>>
>>Only a complete moron would expect a reptile, bird or mammal to turn
into a
>>platypus. That would be evidence of creation, not evolution.
>>
>>>
>>> Exactly. They only offer more reasons why they have faith in
>>> their beliefs.
>>>
>>> People reading such things need only ask one question to realize
>>> every single conclusion they make is nothing more than an
>>> unobservable, untestable, unverifiable belief: has anyone ever
>>> observed such a thing in the entire recorded history of the human
>>> race? The answer is a resounding no.
>>
>>Speciation has been observed in the field and in the lab, many times.
So
>>the answer is a resounding yes, as you have been told many, many times.
>
>We are not talking about the biblical process called evolution. The
>bible teaches speciation. He is talking about things like jumping
>shrews evolving into modern man.
There is no such 'biblical process' and you know it. Not only do you
ignore scientific evidence and lie about it, but you twist the Bible to
your own foolish ends.
|
