On Fri, 9 May 2008 14:49:37 -0700 (PDT), panamfloyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>On May 9, 5:27 pm, Bible Bob <bible...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 May 2008 20:22:50 -0700 (PDT), rogue <rogue...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 9, 2:33 am, Budikka666 <budik...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>www.nature.com/newsrevealsthat the platypus genome has now been
>> >> sequenced.
>>
>> >> This wasn't done by praying, or by divine revelation. It wasn't
>> >> revealed in the Bible or any other ancient religious text.
>>
>> >> Nope, it was done by the hard work of scientists the world over,
many
>> >> of whom no doubt share Gabriel's faith (although not his
pig-ignorant
>> >> practice of it)http://tinyurl.com/4xfj7r
>> >> "Monotreme's genome shares features with mammals, birds and
reptiles."
>>
>> >> That's just what the Theory of Evolution expects to find in such an
>> >> organism - an organism which is ancestrally at a pivotal point in
>> >> evolution - ought to have a mixed up genome.
>>
>> >> Now how could this be if it was designed, by a perfect being,
>> >> literally from the ground up?
>>
>> >> Clearly the platypus evolved. It wasn't designed, unless the
designer
>> >> was a moron.
>>
>> >> Budikka
>>
>> >And lets face it, only a designer who was a moron would put the
>> >urethra in men running through the prostate, and how is that having
>> >testicles OUTSIDE the body working out? ;-) I know when I've taken a
>> >whack there it didn't do much for my faith in Intelligent Design.
>>
>> Rogue,
>>
>> Only a moron
>
>Given past demonstrations of your "intellect", I'd avoid that word if
>I were you.
>
>> would consider that a platypus evolved from another genus
>> without adequate physical evidence.
>
>DNA *is* adequate physical evidence, blockhead. It's not something a
>complete organism generates as a `signature'-it is the actual
>mechanism that determines on the molecular level what kind of an
>organism the cells will form.
No it's not. It's just a bunch of guesswork as I illustrate later in
the thread.
>
>> Shared DNA is proof of nothing
>> other than animals are similar. If the monotreme shares genome
>> features with mamals, birds, and reptiles; so what. It could have
>> originated that way.
>
>"Could have"? So you admit you're grasping at straws?
Nope; not grasping for nothing. Just stating an alternative to
evolutionist dilusions of grandeur.
>
>> Has any scientist observed a reptile, bird, or
>> mamal evolve into a platypus? Nope.
>
>Of course not, dumbass. Such a find would *disprove* evolution.
So much for evolution from one genus to another
>
>> Has any man observed scientists
>> evolve into dummies? Yep. Have platypuses observed dumb scientists?
>> Yep, but they don't judge people.
>>
>> Scientists make wild guesses that there are between 2 and 100 million
>> different species. A first grader could make a guess that accurate.
>> If they don't know how many species there are, then the naming and
>> classifiying of the animals is incomplete. It follows then that
>> taxonomy is incomplete and inaccurate.
>
>The Earth is four and one half billion years old. Humans on the order
>of 200,000. Modern science is less than one thousand years old. And
>yet you expect such a vast effort to have been completed? You're
>nothing but an impatient child, crying because you can't have another
>lollipop before dinner.
Says you and a bunch of guessers. I don't expect anything from
guessers except guesses which from time to time might turn out to be
right guesses.
>
>> I find it funny that scientists who claim to be so smart have not been
>> able to do over hundreds of years what Adam did in one day;
>
>And your evidence for this is....?
That scientists are smart? Hmm. There isn't much evidence to sup****t
that theory is there.
>
>> name the
>> land and air animals. Yep, ole Moses sure wasa lot smarter than
>> scientists.
>
>Moses never existed.
Says you
>
>http://www.amazon.com/Bible-Unearthed-Archaeologys-Vision-Ancient/dp/0684869128
Psuedo science rantings and ravings.
>
>> Moses spoke about gravity, photosynthesis, biology,
>> astronomy, and lots of other science stuff that sceintists are just
>> beginning to learn about. Silly scientists speak down at goat herders
>> who knew more science than they do.
>
>http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/science/short.html
>http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/science/long.html
>
Foolishness of fools.
>> Man and woman were designed
>
>What kind of "designer" would put the nursery so close to the sewer?
>Bob, have you ever seen a woman ****d? Do you know where all those
>parts actually *are*?
>
>> so that man would treat the woman right;
>> being ***** promotes compromise. Healthy prostates have to do with a
>> healthy married life. Go home Jerry.
>>
>> Did you notice that Buddika is loosing her marbles?
>
>No, but I've noticed that *you* cannot comprehend what you read.
You notice a lot of things wrong. I perceive you are too religious.
>
>-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
>aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
>"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
>-Mark Twain
>
>Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
>http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
|
