Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Free Christians > JEHOVAH'S WITNE...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 3 Topic 12181 of 12921
Post > Topic >>

JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES ALTER REPRINTS

by "Carl" <saints@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 30, 2008 at 01:31 AM

The following article shows how the Watchtower Bible And Tract Society 
intentionally alters its reprinted materials to try to cover up its
multiple 
massive mistakes, errors, false teachings, false prophecies, etc. to try
to 
deceive its followers and others.

May God bless,
Carl
my website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
my blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/

---

JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES ALTER REPRINTS
from Watchman Fellow****p

In the June 1, 1989, Watchtower article on Biblical marriage pictured as a

role model a happy Jehovah's Witness couple with the caption, "God's Word 
says: `Let marriage be honorable,'" (p 13).

However after receiving letters that charged this couple with adultery,
the 
Society altered the page in the reprint for the bound volume and replaced 
the picture with that of another Jehovah's Witness couple.

More im****tantly, the society seems to be already back-peddling on the
date 
it most recent suggested for Armageddon.

In the January 1, 1989 Watchtower, p. 12 says, "The apostle Paul was 
spearheading the Christian missionary activity. He was also laying a 
foundation for a work that would be completed in our 20th century,".

This clearly pointed to the year 2000 as the end of Chrisian missionary
work 
and the beginning of the millennium.

Perhaps fearing another 1975, the Society has now removed the deadline in 
the bound volume reprint edition. The bound volume reprint now reads,
"...a 
work that would be completed in our day," (Jan. 1, 1990, p.12)

Comparisons show that the Society gave no footnote to acknowledge or
explain 
the change and Jehovah's Witnesses are left to wonder:

Who approved the prediction that the work, "...would be completed in our 
20th Century?"

Who disagreed with the original Watchtower and had the clout to have the 
reprint altered?

Was the "20th Century" date "new light" or a typographical error?

Is the reprint newer light canceling out the new light in the original 
version?

Will the work end in "our 20th century," or "in our day," or neither?
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES ALTER REPRINTS
"Carl" <sain  2008-04-30 01:31:23 
Long john Silvers
Dixe Hollins <mikeakle  2008-04-30 10:52:52 
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES ALTER REPRINTS
"Carl" <sain  2008-04-30 14:03:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 9:44:39 CDT 2008.