I think it's pretty clear from that other thread that my
prediction was spot-on. No creationist dare explain how to
differentiate one ``type'' (etc.) from another, as that would
instantly lead to a complete invalidation of their fundamental
premise. Instead, we had a few creationists do the typical ``try
to change the subject'' routine, while the most vocal creationists
didn't even bother to show up.
So, let's show them how it's done, eh? I'd especially like to hear
from our favorite regulars, such as Budikkka, DanielSan, Mike
Gray, Duckman, and all the rest. But any and all who care to
answer these questions are most welcome, of course.
The four questions:
Ma nish ta noh hali -- erp. Sorry. Worng Questions....
Anyway, they are:
1) What is a commonly-accepted scientific definition of
the term, ``species''?
b) How might one determine that two organisms are of
different species?
III) Please cite at least one instance of observed
speciation, described in a relevant peer-reviewed
journal, in which every generation from original to new
species was observed. A brief summary plus the citation
is plenty.
100) Please cite at least one instance of demonstrated
speciation in which the initial and terminal species
have significant, preferably radical, morphological
differences. It is not necessary that the lineage
be complete, though (of course!) the more complete
the better. Again, the citation must come from a
relevant peer-reviewed journal. A brief summary plus
the citation is plenty.
Ladies and gentlemen, start your engines!
Cheers,
b&
--
EAC Memographer
BAAWA Knight of Blasphemy
``All but God can prove this sentence true.''
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.pronews.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
