I should correct that the Federal Election referenced is 2007 and not
2004. That if the usual hecklers were in any way rational and
constructive in their dialog, they would have been able to identify
and clarify that anomoly.
Polly the Parrot says, "Of course it does. Never mind, a good lie
down might make you feel better before nursie gives you a sponge
bath."
Barry OGrady says, "So you agree that the usage of the GRAPPLE
HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON as AUTONOMIC OVERLAY as claim to Religious belief
is compatible to the ideals expressed within =91Churches and
Federation=92, but do you understand WTF it means?"
That with respects to marriage as a parner****p being the undertaking
of an agreement between parties currently only as male and female, it
means that we don't have to put up with the religious ceremony
associated to the State's licensing of marriage--that the marriage
ceremony as religious event is a breach of Section 116 of the
Australian Constituion, which prohibits the enforcing of religious
practices.
That as the rights of Indigenous Aboriginal's with respect to the
Australian Constitution were ignored, did they as a people have
marriage rites or was marriage regarded as an act of nature--by
copulation?
Whilst there is on the one hand an issue of lack of separation of
Church and State with respect to the performance of marriage
ceremonies. That marriage, rather than being regarded as an act of
nature by copulation, is an autonomic transformative prototype
associated to religious mysticism, which is a product of cosmological
understanding that has historically been associated with a HETEROS
symbolic understanding of number=97that this conflicts with Indigenous
Dutch Australian identity.
That since the Dynamic Natural Associators deployed in the HETEROS
autonomic transformative prototype to which the function of marriage
is assoicated are already Super-ego (male) and Ego (female), the
perfect relation****p can be thought of in these terms and is in
reality gender--independent.
The perfect relation****p (marriage) whether as the partnering of male
+ female, male + male or female + female will occur when there is a
proper interaction as dynamic natural associator between the Super-ego
and Ego (ie. the Super-ego is able to foster, sustain and nurture the
Ego) and those roles are gender independent.
For example, think of a square who's two (male and female) sides
comprise a 1 Unit and the diagonal is incommensuate, that when we
regard God as One, there is no dichotomy of being.
In religious mysticism, there is typically a strategy deployed for
overcoming this incommensurate cir***stance. And example of this is
the Fibonacci (d. 1250) number sequence which mimics genealogical
progression and is associated to successive number which are equal to
the sum of the two preceding numbers.
But the New Testament includes a warning that Christian Theology
deployed on such architectures as no basis in truth: "Beware-BLEPO {to
look upon, be aware of} lest any man spoil-SULAGOGEO {to lead away as
booty; to seduce} you through philosophy-PHILOSOPHIA {ie. hymeneal
mysticism as sophistry of HETEROS} and vain-KENOS deceit-APATE, after
the tradition-PARADOSIS {ie. 'servitude-DOULOU to that which by nature-
PHUSIS {germination or expansion, natural reproduction} is not-ME god-
THEOS'} of men-ANTHROPOS, after the rudiments-STOICHEION of the world-
KOSMOS, and not after Christ. For in him dwells all-PAS the fulness-
PLEROMA of the Godhead-THEOTES bodily-SOMATIKOS {ie. cor****eally, or
physically as the forma cor****is}. And you are complete in him, which
is the head-KEPHALE of all principality-ARCHE and power-
EXOUSIA." [Colossians 2:1-10]
The days of the week according to the HETEROS (marriage as autonomic
transfromative prototype) and cosmological view are only a symbollic
number usage, whereas, when you speak of the 'oth cycle of 1092 days
(2184 days =3D 6 x 364 days) associated to the Equinox Cycle of the
Bible's Sabbath based Everlasting Covenant, you are talking of a
quatitative perspective of number.
- dolf
Anti-Discrimination Board of New South Wales
Level 4, 175-183 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
5 May 2008 [SUPER: #387 / #34 - Great Guide/ Trust in its Perfection;
I-Ching: H18 - Arresting Decay; Tetra: #27 - Duties / EGO: #270 / #74
- Controlling Feelings/ Overcome Delusion; I-Ching: H39 - Obstacles;
Tetra: #80 - Labouring]
RE: Complaint reference number: 2008/0250
Thank-you for the letter from a Tory McGuire as Acting Manager=97
Enquiries and Conciliation Branch dated 30 April 2008 [SUPER: #498 /
#65 - Unlearned Virtuosity/ Virtue of Simplicity; I-Ching: H20 -
Contemplation; Tetra: #63 - Watch / EGO: #403 / #53 - Increasing
Evidence/ Gaining Insight; I-Ching: H13 - Companion****p; Tetra: #53 -
Eternity] and postmarked 2 May 2008 [SUPER: #274 / #51 - Natural
Guides and Natural Virtuosity/ Nursing Virtue; I-Ching: H47 -
Exhaustion; Tetra: #69 - Exhaustion / EGO: #326 / #27 - Paradoxes of
the Greatest Skill/ Function of Skill; I-Ching: H21 - Biting Through;
Tetra: #74 - Closure] wherein there is advice of having received my
change of address notification dated 27 April 2008 [SUPER: #220 / #13
- Status/ Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Delay; Tetra: #17 - Holding
Back / EGO: #274 / #11 - Value of Non-Existence/ Function of the Non-
Existent; I-Ching: H8 - Seeking Unity; Tetra: #33 - Closeness] with
respect to this complaint.
The Board advises that it has sent me a previous response to my
initial complaint dated 19 March 2008 [SUPER: #382 / #52 - So What?/
Returning to the Origin; I-Ching: H45 - Congregation; Tetra: #61 -
Embellishment / EGO: #421 / #48 - Forgetting/ Forgetting Knowledge; I-
Ching: H35 - Progress; Tetra: #20 - Advance] by letter to an address
unrelated to me and the substance of the complaint situated at 71
Central Ave, Chipping Norton NSW 2170. And suggest in case I did not
receive this letter, that you attach a copy for my convenience and
further encourage my contacting the Board Complaint=92s Intake Team by
telephone if I have further enquiries.
In that previous response dated 2 April 2008 [SUPER: #302 / #57 -
Laissez Faire Politics/ Simplicity In Habits; I-Ching: H37 - Family;
Tetra: #39 - Residence / EGO: #281 / #21 - Guiding and the Physical/
Emptying the Heart; I-Ching: H31 - Influence; Tetra: #42 - Going to
Meet] as letter which was by administrative error as seemingly in
contravention of its =91private and confidential=92 status, was sent to
the wrong residential address, it is conveyed that =93the Anti-
Discrimination Board have decided to the decline your complaint
because it does not disclose a contravention of the Anti-
Discrimination Act. It appears from your complaint that the service
was provided to you in Victoria and was from a provider located in
Western Australia.
As such there is no event in public life in New South Wales and
therefore no contravention of the ADA.=94
Please note that under section 84B(4) of the ADA you cannot request
that this decision be reviewed by the Administrative Decisions
Tribunal Board. And you enclose a copy of Section 89B and advise that
I may wish to seek independent legal assistance about any other course
of action that may be open to me.
You further advise that the file is closed and the Board will take no
further action on my complaint. This means that I cannot re-open this
complaint or make a complaint about the same incidents in future.
As the Anti-Discrimination Board appears to be unwilling to undertake
any further action on my complaint, I will not then enter into any
conjecture that the misdirection of the 2 April 2008 correspondence to
a Chipping North address was in anyway purposeful and spiteful as a
consideration of perpetuating an injury in the vain and futile
expectant of apology. I have sought to publicly respond to the
misimpression that might be consequential to such unconsidered action
by the Anti-Discrimination Board. And clarify that misnomer at the
following newsgroup addresses:
aus.politics,
aus.tv,
aus.education,
aus.religion.judaism,
aus.religion.christian
The Anti-Discrimination Board need not unnecessarily endure any
further, a dichotomy of obligation to undertake any restitutive action
in that respect.
PUBLIC LIFE OF THE COMPLAINT IN NEW SOUTH WALES
The original complaint was made with respect to discrimination by the
compliance officer for SOUL Communications Pty Ltd (ABN 99 085 089
970) of GPO BOX 9861 Perth WA 6848 and other unknown 3rd Parties
relating to the provision of goods and services.
The Public Life of the Complaint relates to my having on 4 March 2008
[SUPER: #341 / #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts/ Emptiness & Non-
Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Arresting Decay; Tetra: #26 - Endeavor /
EGO: #440 / #13 - Status/ Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Delay; Tetra:
#17 - Holding Back] entered into a Residential Tenancy Agreement made
on 5 March 2008 [SUPER: #486 / #60 - Skill at Ruling/ How to Maintain
One's Place; I-Ching: H15 - Modesty; Tetra: #5 - Keeping Small / EGO:
#438 / #63 - Origins in Reversal/ Consider Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 -
Thunderclap; Tetra: #62 - Doubt] at Darlinghurst New South Wales 2010.
A Notice of Disposition on an Interest in Land situated as Lot No. 1,
Plan No. PS 144331, Volume 9539, Folio 405 in the Municipality of
Wellington ****re Council, Victoria was entered into contract on 30
January 2008 [SUPER: #294 / #10 - Impossible Advice/ What can Be
Done?; I-Ching: H30 - Clinging to Brightness; Tetra: #41 - Response /
EGO: #298 / #2 - Contrast of Terms/ Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace; Tetra: #16 - Contact] with date of possession given 18 March
2008 [SUPER: #438 / #16 - Being a Guide/ Returning to the Root; I-
Ching: H28 - Excess; Tetra: #75 - Failure / EGO: #237 / #28 -
Opposites and Primitivism/ Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 -
Turning Point; Tetra: #2 - Full Circle] or the Thursday thereafter.
I had prior to entering into such Tenancy Rental Agreement within New
South Wales on 5 March 2008, corresponded to Soul Communications by
registered post letter dated 26 February 2008 [SUPER: #289 / #33 =96
Achievable Goals/ Virtue of Discrimination; I-Ching: H9 - Minor
Restraint; Tetra: #35 - Gathering / EGO: #255 / #4 - Using Guidance/
Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment; Tetra: #81 - Fostering]
directed to their Perth Post Office Box customer services address,
regarding the termination of telephony services to Customer Number
2350577.
Therein I said, I have provided by letter dated 18 November 2007
[Super: #400 / #55 - Abstruse Signs/ Signet of the Mysterious; I-
Ching: H22 - Grace; Tetra: #54 - Unity; Ego: #408 / #55 - Abstruse
Signs/ Signet of the Mysterious; I-Ching: H22 - Grace; Tetra: #54 -
Unity] made to Andrew HIPE as compliance officer for SOUL
Communications Pty Ltd, =91notice in writing=92 under Clause 1.1.2 of the
Customer Agreement, of my desire to terminate my ADSL agreement
effective from 30 January 2008.
Notice was then given in writing as instructions for the termination
of my telephone agreement effective from the date of the anticipated
18 March 2008 settlement date for the disposition of an interest in
land.
I further advised that billing information for the date 15 January
2008 and 15 February 2008 incorrectly showed charges for the
discontinued provision of Internet Services and ought to be adjusted
accordingly.
Having not received a final statement of account by means of
redirected mail to my Sydney address, I again by letter dated 24 April
2008 [SUPER: #400 / #61 - Virtuosity at Using 'Beneath'/ Virtue of
Humility; I-Ching: H64 - Before Completion; Tetra: #78 - On the
Verge / EGO: #358 / #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue; I-
Ching: H49 - Revolution; Tetra: #28 - Change] advised that I had
recently undertaken the sale of my property situated at Briagolong
Victoria.
Furthermore, I conveyed that I have not received information from Soul
Communications with respect to a concluding and amended statement of
account=97And asked whether Soul Communications would be so kind as to
forward me this information to my new residential address situated in
New South Wales.
I repeated my observation that the previous account information
conveyed as =91CN Resolution TIO=92 provides no explanation for the credit
of $284.85 dated 22 November 2007 relating to my request to cease my
ADSL Contract. Apart from this Andrew HIPE has provided no
explanation and has been singularly unresponsive as to grounds for the
disruption of service, which led to my terminating my contract for the
provision of telecommunications services with SOUL Communications, and
whether this was due to complaint by unknown 3rd parties.
And advised that this matter relating to =91CN Resolution TIO=92 has now
been directed to the Anti-Discrimination Board of New South Wales as a
more responsive jurisdiction.
By the cir***stance that I was a resident of New South Wales beginning
4 March 2008, the contract with the telecommunications provider did
not conclude until after my Victorian property settlement occurring on
20 March 2008 and the final billing with respect to resolution of
matters presently the subject of complaint before the New South Wales
Anti-Discrimination Board, has still not been received at my Sydney
address=97the complaint relating to =93interference with the operations of
the service network, anyone else=92s enjoyment of their service or which
upsets of offends any person,=94 being the result of censor****p by
action of the complaint from 3rd parties relating to a telephone text
message from me and made to two candidates in the Federal Election
2007 who are aligned with the Australian Christian Lobby in actuality
therefore has a continuing life within New South Wales.
And with respect to its contextual history, I refer to observations of
=91Churches and Federation=92 made by Ian Breward from pages 219 to 221
within =91A History of the Churches in Australasia=92 (1991 edition) with
respect individual conscience and the role of religion in political
life associated with the adoption of Section 116 of the Constitution:
=93The move to Federation of the Australasian colonies demonstrated the
determination of leaders to reject sectarianism. Some were willing to
create a secular constitution rather than see the possibility of a
persecuting establishment. That led to some vigorous discussion on
the desirability of =91God=92 being mentioned in the proposed
constitution. Some opponents were strong Christians, who saw no need
for any formal relation between religion and politics. Indeed, they
argued, with a considerable amount of historical justification, that
the freedom of churches to carry out their mission came from God, and
did not need any constitutional foundation, apart from the liberty of
individual conscience, and the prohibition of any religious tests for
the holding of public office. Seventh-day Adventists, with American
precedents in mind, were determined that they should not be the
victims of Protestant Sabbatarians who denied them the right to work
on Sunday. Some Jews felt equally strongly, even though the number of
Orthodox Jews was not great.
Other Protestant groups, like the New South Wales Council of Churches,
were not only pressing for the recognition of God, but also for
Parliament to be opened with prayer, and the governor-general to have
the power to call days of national thanksgiving and humiliation. The
Seventh-day Adventists managed a very effective counter campaign.
They were painfully aware that William and Henry Firth have been
sentenced to the stocks in Paramatta on 22 April 1894. [SUPER: #348 /
#22 - Point to Reversal?/ Humility's Increase; I-Ching: H8 - Seeking
Unity; Tetra: #34 - Kin****p / EGO: #213 / #16 - Being a Guide/
Returning to the Root; I-Ching: H28 - Excess; Tetra: #75 - Failure]
They had been prosecuted by the New South Wales Council of Churches
for working on Sunday.
In addition to their in-house paper, the Bible Echo, they also
published the quarterly Sentinel, and Herald of Liberty, modelled on a
similar journal in the USA. It reached a circulation figure of 4,000
and its emphases were welcomed by come of the major dailies.
The small Seventh-day Adventist church was able exercise such leverage
because I reaffirmed principles which had already been used by
Baptists, Congregationalists, and some Presbyterians to defeat a dual
system of education. It distributed tracts door-to-door in tens of
thousands and, as a result, won over 22,000 signatures to their
petition against any religious clause or declaration of belief in the
Constitution. Even the Bulletin approved of their common sense, but
the recognition petition still managed to gain more than twice the
number of signatures, as well as some weighty political sup****ters.
The first referendum on federation failed on 3 June 1898. [SUPER:
#452 / #52 - So What?/ Returning to the Origin; I-Ching: H45 -
Congregation; Tetra: #61 - Embellishment / EGO: #404 / #46 - Guiding
Contentment/ Moderation of Desire; I-Ching: H1 - Creative Principle/
Heaven; Tetra: #37 - Purity] Cardinal Moran, who had unsuccessfully
stood for the Convention in 1896, carefully intervened in the late
stages of the campaign prior to the second referendum, with the result
that many priests urged their pari****oners to vote for the bill.
In Brisbane, the Revd William Higlett, a Baptist minister, argued that
federation would enhance Australia=92s ability to fulfil it missionary
responsibility to the Pacific Islands. The pro vote increased by
36,000, giving the bill a comfortable majority over the almost 83,000
who voted against it.
Sir George Reid, a premier of New South Wales, had also changed sides,
and some modest changes were made to the bill, but the churches were
clearly influential. Both Moran and the Anglican archbishop, Saumarez
Smith, were in favour of Section 116 of the Constitution, which
prevented Sabbatarian legislation, and ensured that the governor-
general could not proclaim days of humiliation and thanksgiving. The
issue of prayers in Parliament, and questions of ecclesiastical
precedence, caused some discussion, but the latter was a prerogative
matter. Nevertheless, it caused considerable tension, because of the
symbolic im****tance of the issues involved.
Moran refused to share in the official inauguration ceremony when his
claim to precedence on seniority was rejected. Smith read the prayer
on 1 January. [SUPER: #329 / #48 - Forgetting/ Forgetting Knowledge; I-
Ching: H35 - Progress; Tetra: #20 - Advance / EGO: #329 / #48 -
Forgetting/ Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Progress; Tetra: #20
- Advance] Presbyterians also had some claim to precedence because of
links with the Church of Scotland, but failing that they argued for
equality. At the opening of Parliament, Lord Hopetoun read a prayer,
which created an im****tant precedent. W. Knox and J.T. Walker moved,
in each house, that prayer begin each session.
They had sup****t from all major church leaders in Victoria, and though
some argued that this would break Section 116 of the Commonwealth=92s
Constitution, the majority agreed that a standing order was not a
law. But the prayer was theist rather than Christian, showing, yet
again, that lay Christianity was non-sectarian and not interested in
issues of dogma. The prayer was read by the Speaker, There has never
been a chaplain to either house, unlike the practice in the US
Congress. Only a New Zealand delegate asked about the constitutional
position of the Aborigines, who were completely ignored in the final
drafts.=94
That this relates to my sending a telephone text message as request
made to two Federal Election candidates claiming Christian Identity in
the weeks prior to the 24 November 2007 Federal Election. Whereby I
sought to advise and caution two Australian Christian Lobby members
who were standing as candidates within that Federal Election Campaign
in the event they were going to make any public religious values
statements associated to the ideological view of marriage and
homo***uality.
The Australian Christian Lobby is a national organization with offices
situated at Suite 9, National Press Club, 16 National Circuit, Barton
ACT 2600. The www-page hosted by this organization and from where I
obtained the election candidates telephone number to whom I text
messaged, shows the Registrant as the Australian Christian Lobby with
an ACT registration: CAN 075120517 and www-page namespace registrant
ROID of C00127772-AR.
This organization has representatives in each state under the
Commonwealth of Australia with a postal address for New South Wales
given as: PO Box 267, Windsor NSW 2756.
Within my complaint I had conveyed that the =93interference of the
service network=94 was according to my belief, perpetuated by 3rd
parties which I believe to have member****p of the Australian Christian
Lobby and was a deliberate attempt to subject to censor****p during in
the lead up to the 24 November 2007 Federal Election.
This opinion is substantiated by the religious and political nature of
my telephone message, where I conveyed that they would be required to
distinguish and differentiate such aspirational obscurant fideism as
religious belief (or no religious belief) from the Natural Law view of
Hymeneal Values proscribing marriage and ***ual conduct for citizens
as ideology promulgated by the Concordat between the Papal Holy See &
German Reich=97in my view the mechanism underpinning this Concordat may
well have had a mathematical dependency.
There was by the Papal Holy See of the Vatican City State, multiple
representations and protests to governing authorities in Germany, as
the clear and energetic language, of a duty to respect and fulfill the
obligations of the NATURAL LAW itself that were confirmed by the
Concordat between the Holy See & the German Reich of 20 July 1933.
Following such Concordat, there was in 30 June 1934, [SUPER: #405 /
#55 - Abstruse Signs/ Signet of the Mysterious; I-Ching: H22 - Grace;
Tetra: #54 - Unity / EGO: #299 / #32 - Natural Guide/ Virtue of
Holiness; I-Ching: H44 - Coming On; Tetra: #43 - Encounters] a Party
Purge as the 'Nacht der Langen Messer (Night of the Long Knives)' and
Bishop of Rottenburg-Stuttgart, Dr. Johannes Baptista Sproll's
antagonism as outrage which can best be described as a tussle over
authority relating to a plebiscite of 10 April 1938, [SUPER: #395 /
#29 - Deeming/ Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 - Sinking Light; Tetra: #67
- Darkening / EGO: #309 / #29 - Deeming/ Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Sinking Light; Tetra: #67 - Darkening] which necessitated vacating his
residence, returning only on 15 July 1938 [SUPER: #381 / #16 - Being a
Guide/ Returning to the Root; I-Ching: H28 - Excess; Tetra: #75 -
Failure / EGO: #374 / #56 - Abstruse Virtuosity/ Virtue of the
Mysterious; I-Ching: H55 - Abundance; Tetra: #46 - Enlargement] under
direct Papal Authority. The Nuremberg Papers records the concerns as
social outrage by proponents of what, till then was regarded by many
as German Democracy to Bishop Dr. Sproll of Rottenburg. Frequent
mention is made of the Bishop praying before (if not to) the exposed
Blessed Sacrament (Eucharist).
This =93State's interest=94 over any subsuming of the sovereign autonomic
right began with the 30 June 1934 [SUPER: #405 / #55 - Abstruse Signs/
Signet of the Mysterious; I-Ching: H22 - Grace; Tetra: #54 - Unity /
EGO: #299 / #32 - Natural Guide/ Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
Coming On; Tetra: #43 - Encounters] Party Purge and to such interests
the ecclesiastical authorities were required to swear allegiance:
=93Before God and on the Holy Gospels=94 is commemorated by the Homo***ual
Monument situated at Westerkerk (1620 CE) Prinsengracht, Amsterdam
Netherlands.
The text of the phone message is as follows:
"How does the Australian Christian Lobby's ideological view of
marriage and homo***uality associated to aspirational obscurant
fideism as religious belief differ from the Natural Law view of
Hymeneal Values proscribing marriage and ***ual conduct for citizens
as ideology promulgated by the Concordat between the Papal Holy See &
The German Reich of 20 July 1933? [SUPER: #363 / #77 - Natural Guide/
Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 - Stagnation; Tetra: #57 - Guardedness /
EGO: #396 / #78 - Recognizing Fidelity/ Trust in Faith; I-Ching: H59 -
Dispersal; Tetra: #47 - Pattern]
I have set up a www-page at http://home.mysoul.com.au/grapple/
[since
removed by me on 24 January 2008] which provides my answer.
I'd like to know when the Australian Christian Lobby is going to show
compliance with respect to their aspirations towards a more responsive
duty to State and ethical use of force as obligation of individual,
government and non-government organizational and military
accountability to the Commonwealth undertaken in accordance with
Section 8 of the Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution of 1901
and Treason as defined by Section 9A of the Crimes Act 6231/1958.
If the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON as statement on TIME {ie. Telos
[122J3W1D] =3D Arch [3W1D] + c=B2 [9(9=B2+1)/2]} is not central to the
rationality, reasoning psyche and wisdom of the human experience, then
you are simply having a self-infatuation as you grasp for your desire--
what ever superficiality and tem****al thing or values that may be.
If you can't answer the question then please refrain from violating my
Australian Constitutional Rights as an Indigenous Dutch Australian."
That this request was similar to a request made in person at about
1013 hours [SUPER: #434 / #51 - Natural Guides and Natural Virtuosity/
Nursing Virtue; I-Ching: H47 - Exhaustion; Tetra: #69 - Exhaustion /
EGO: #383 / #56 - Abstruse Virtuosity/ Virtue of the Mysterious; I-
Ching: H55 - Abundance; Tetra: #46 - Enlargement] on 25 October 2007
[SUPER: #517 / #74 - Controlling Feelings/ Overcome Delusion; I-Ching:
H39 - Obstacles; Tetra: #80 - Labouring / EGO: #456 / #37 - Non-
Deeming Action/ Administration of Government; I-Ching: H40 -
Deliverance; Tetra: #21 - Release] to the Victorian Federal Senator
Steve Fielding a member of the Family First Political Party. I saw
the politician with a brochure in hand, talking to an elderly female
person, whilst others stood a short distance nearby. He was standing
by a window outside a branch of the Commonwealth Bank and opposite the
Bendigo Bank in Cunninghame Street, Sale. At this intersection of the
Raymond Street business precinct there is situated a clock tower.
I interrupted this dialogue. And after being foisted off by the
Senator, who viewed my distressed concerns as last election's mantra,
I retracted. Standing some 15 feet away, I said in a clear loud voice,
words to the effect: "Senator Steve Fielding, you have received a
registered post letter with respect to your public comments on
homo***uality=97 that if you are going to make any further public
comments on homo***uality, you are therefore required to provide
differentiation of that view from Fascism of 1933 to 1945--will you
now give substantiation of your view?"
=46rom later media re****ts, Senator Fielding was also in Warragul
performing a similar feat as "procedure with a brochure" in hand,
talking to elderly and heretofore unaccountable persons--Having
visited the Boer War Memorial the day prior, I formed the view, that
he was given to any lack of energy as unwillingness towards any
integrity in resolving this incongruity over Indigenous Dutch
Australian identity and that it not be abrogated by Irish descendents
who however democratic, are privately in their Catholic Eucharist and
refusal of communion, a pestilence to the recognition of any autonomic
and sovereign right, in being bequeathed to this nation, a vassal
people to the British Sovereignty over Ireland is also Defender of the
Faith.
In the sixteenth century, Holland was part of the Spanish empire.
Following the abdication of the Habsburg emperor Charles V in 1555,
his son Phillip II (1527-1598) was at the head of the empire. Philip
faced two major political problems: from the beginning of the century
the Protestant movement in the northern part of the Netherlands had
continued to grow, and this growth was accompanied by a desire for
greater autonomy.
Philip, a strict Catholic, responded to these developments by
vigorously suppressing Protestantism and transferring his centre of
power from Madrid to Brussels. This led to considerable tension in
Holland. Following a time of extreme cold and in the midst of an
economic recession, the situation exploded. In 1566 the interiors of a
number of Catholic churches were destroyed. This iconoclasm was the
prelude to a more general revolt against Spanish rule in the northern
provinces.
Two years later, the battle of Heiligerlee between Spanish armies and
the troops of the insurgents marked the official start of the Eighty
Years' War, which would ultimately lead to the separation of the
Northern and Sourthern Netherlands. The South chose the side of the
Catholic monarch Philip, while the North drove out the foreign armies
of occupation. In 1581 the seven rebellious provinces--Friesland,
Gelderland, Groningen, Holland, Overijssel, Utrecht and Zeeland--
declared that they no longer recognized Philip as their ruler.
Efforts to find a successor failed, and in 1588 the provinces decided
that they had no need for a successor and founded an independent
republic. That republic was known as the Seven United Provinces, later
joined by the provinces of Brabant and Limburg. The Protestant or
Calvinist faith was the main religion in the Republic. The central
government was formed by the States General, made up of
representatives of the seven provinces." [Introduction, The Golden Age
of the Netherlands, Revolution and Republic, Dutch Masters from the
Rijksmuseum (c) 1969, Amsterdam p xxvi-xxvii]
That if the =93constitutional position of the Aborigines, who were
completely ignored in the final drafts=94 of Section 116 to the
Australian Constitution, what then does that convey in relation to a
lack of any contest between the autonomic right of Indigenous Dutch
Australians as the product of Dutch colonialism and of British
colonialism. The Australian Constitution by Letters Patent of 29
October 1900 [SUPER: #367 / #44 - Moderate Values/ Setting Up
Precepts; I-Ching: H1 - Creative Principle/Heaven; Tetra: #36 -
Strength / EGO: #369 / #44 - Moderate Values/ Setting Up Precepts; I-
Ching: H1 - Creative Principle/Heaven; Tetra: #36 - Strength] are a
product of the Boer War in 1899 to 1902 and contest against Dutch
colonialism: "As part of the British Empire, the Australian colonies
offered troops for the war for colonial control in South Africa. At
least 12,000 Australians served in contigents raised by the six
colonies [as nomes within the nomarchy] or (from 1901) by the new
Australian Commonwealth (about a third of men enlisting twice), and
many more joined British or South African colonial units in South
Africa.
The conflict in South Africa is generally divided into three phases:
a) the early phase from October to December 1899, when the British
armies, mainly infantry, were defeated or beseiged by highly mobile
Boer mounted troops;
b) the second phase from December 1899 until September 1900, which
involved a British counter-offensive resulting in the capture of most
of the major towns and cities of South Africa; and during
c) the third and longest phase from September 1900 to May 1902, there
was mainly a guerrilla conflict between British mounted troops and
Boer irregulars.
At least 600 Australians died in the war, about half from disease and
half in action." [Australian War Memorial WWW-public statements on
Australia and the Boer War of 1899 to 1902]
That the Victorian Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission has
sanctioned by inaction, Archbishop Pell=92s refusal of communion as a
religious act of heteronomy against the autonomous regulative free
will associated with the Commonwealth as responsive duty to state
associated to the ethical use of force as obligations placed upon
Australians as participants within that Sovereign Autonomous entity=97
that this act constitutes Treason and incitement to Treason by
Archbishop Pell which is prohibited under the Crimes Act in addition
to a breach of Section 116 of the Australian Constitution.
The conduct by the Roman Catholic Church is entirely antagonistic
delinquency to the 'right of humanity in his own person' as the
reasonable desire, moral responsibility and duty accorded to
democratic regulative free-will and pre-requisite to any presence,
participation and procreation as marriage right and duties within the
Commonwealth of Australia=97a habitual disdain as unmitigated,
unbridled, hatred and aberration of this right as obligation under
Section 8 of the Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution of
1901.
A valid question is raised on the legitimacy of Roman Catholicism as
Christian Identity (25% of the Australian population) and its
incompatibility to democratic regulative free-will as continuing
disrespect of duty to State, by the cir***stance that I am able to
provide a natural theological and metempirical philosophical
cir***scribing of the Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution
and the Teleological argument in sup****t of the origin of the English
language substantiated by the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON establishes
my own religious and scientifically valid belief in autonomous
regulative free will associated with the Commonwealth as responsive
duty to state associated to the ethical use of force as obligations
placed upon Australians as participants within that Sovereign
Autonomous entity.
I really don't know why people should feel so threatened by a rational
autonomic basis to religious belief, as the holding of a paradigm of
mind which is related to the permanent principle underlying tem****al
things, has in relation to the Logos as Infinity, a logical grounding
in chronology for which I observe the Sabbath.
But as this paradigm also provides the categories of understanding for
the tem****al and non-tem****al sphere which are equated with the Hebrew
language and any other language sustained by milesian ordinals, I
therefore do not subscribe to any religion which has a creed as a
human construct created as a semantical world of discourse--because it
is sub-ordinate to my own transcendent, metempirical and metaphyscial
philosophical and religious belief.
I have published this as a religious statement, and I note my
behaviour is in accord as equilibrium with it on a day to day and hour
to hour basis.
http://www.grapple.id.au/kabbalah/grappleIcon.html?vMode=3D0.1.2&vExpand=3Da=
ll
I do know, that I have been denied religious freedom by others who
continue to desire to impugn my autonomic right and basis to religious
belief, by continually seeking to ****tray me as dispossessed of mind.
That the religious and political belief and activities in which I
engage, is sup****ted =93by substantial writing in the area, in God=92s
manifestation in nature and in human languages and numerical systems
as a unified system.=94 This religious and political belief and activity
as outlined above is Constitutionally compliant, lawful, articulated
and cir***scribed by number and being compatible with the number
schema deployed within jurisprudence as paradigm of mind and being=97
therefore renders Refusal of Communion as an attempt by the Roman
Catholic Church to enforce a religious observance against the
Constitutional Imperative is therefore, a breach of Section 116 of the
Australian Constitution of 1901.
In all respects Australia's aspirational goals towards establi****ng a
Commonwealth--is notionally the product of German Intellectualism, and
which in routing the Indigenous Dutch Australian population as freemen
into a Territory, is absent of any underlying unifying autonomic
anthropic cosmological principle such as the Sabbath or the Septet
mathematical form implicit to the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTC NOUMENON.
It is my steadfast view that Cardinal George Pell, has unjustly,
unrighteously as treason and incitement to treason against the
autonomic right under the Commonwealth, stated his opinion against
homo***uality within the innermost sanctuary as sacred precincts of
the church, accompanying the occasion of Mass as theurgical ritual.
Whereby he sought to bind the conscience of the congregation to the
Institutional ethos, thereby engaging in psychological impunity and
violence as a religious values statement that were untrue, irrational,
solfataric solecism and slanderous heteronomy against the autonomic
right to individual conscience.
The manifest of an Irish and Catholic presence with its own
categorical imperative for a national identity as organisational,
institutional or collective group mind, has been historically bestowed
as pestilence upon this nation as a product of British Imperialism. By
the nature of its dichotomist and antithetical culture is
indistinguishable by its essential character from German Fascism=97there
was outrage by unionism against New South Wales privatisation of the
Electricity supply.
With respects to the history of Dutch toleration and Catholic
indulgence against the autonomic right, the situational arrogance and
aloofness as feigned superiority which is claimed and bestowed en
masse by the Roman Catholic Church as aspirational obscurant fideism
and which character members of the Italian community frequently
exhibit in this country as immigrants (they are not alone in this),
may be more appropriately termed not a 'cultural cringe' but a
'cultural disease'--a disorder of structure or function in a human
quality, habit or disposition regarded as adversely affecting a person
or group of people and especially one that produces specific signs or
symptoms or that affects a specific location.
I have by letter of 10 March 2008 [SUPER: #363 / #39 - Achieving
Oneness/ Root of Order; I-Ching: H28 - Excess; Tetra: #76 -
Aggravation / EGO: #449 / #78 - Recognizing Fidelity/ Trust in Faith;
I-Ching: H59 - Dispersal; Tetra: #47 - Pattern] advised the Victorian
Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission of my departure from the
State of Victoria due to continuing instances of corruption, denial of
justice and religious, racial and ***ual vilification perpetuated by
the Victoria Police, the Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission
and others.
I=92m of the view, that each of my complaints before the Equal
Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission have been sustained and that
the Commission, in failing to direct the matters to the Victorian
Civil and Administrative Tribunal, is acting improperly against the
very Freedoms which as a matter of principle representatives of the
Commonwealth who swear an oath of allegiance, and during their ANZAC
Day 25 April 2008 memorial and religious services, claimed to uphold
with the utmost integrity.
And this might be said to apply with respects to the August 2007
passage of the Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill as an Act to amend
the Commonwealth Marriage Act 1961 and Family Law Act 1975, with a
formal monogamous definition of gamogenesis as: =93marriage means the
union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily
entered into for life=94.
Whilst there is on the one hand an issue of lack of separation of
Church and State with respect to the performance of marriage
ceremonies. That marriage, rather than being regarded as an act of
nature by copulation, is an autonomic transformative prototype
associated to religious mysticism, which is a product of cosmological
understanding that has historically been associated with a HETEROS
symbolic understanding of number=97that this conflicts with Indigenous
Dutch Australian identity.
Is not the New South Wales Attorney-General John Hatzistergos
therefore required under Section 8 of the Letters Patent to the
Australian Constitution of 1901 to provide substantiation of the
Commonwealth=92s definition of marriage as claim to religious identity
and how this is differentiated from the Categorical Imperative of 1933
to 1945 as conveyed by the Concordat and those made by the Roman
Catholic Church.
Such lack of action renders the actions and comments made by
Hatzistergos that a Bill of Rights is therefore antagonistic to the
Sovereign and Autonomic requirement under the Commonwealth--as
unreasonable on his part in the mistaken belief that marriage is an
act of piety rather than the State's licensing of immigrant feral
fascist dogs.
Whether a lack of separation between Church and State over individual
marriages is the singular cause for members of the New South Wales
Anti-Discrimination Board improper handling of my complaint is not
open for me to make conjecture upon.
However, Roman Catholic members of staff would be mistaken in thinking
that such forfeited and evil claim to Christian identity is compatible
in any way with claims to Christian identity made by the State as
Commonwealth=97and I would caution them for dismissing my complaint
under any misguided notion of religious fervour due to the visitation
by Pope Benedict.
Should there be no apology from the Roman Catholic Church during this
State visit by the Pope, for the sanctioning of Archbishop Pell=92s
refusal of communion against a Catholic mother on 'Pentecost Sunday'
31 May 1998 and Pentecost Sunday 11 June 2000, Saint Patrick's
Catholic Church, Melbourne as a religious act of heteronomy against
autonomous regulative free will associated with the Commonwealth as
responsive duty to state associated to the ethical use of force as
obligations placed upon Australians as participants within that
Sovereign Autonomous entity=97that this act constitutes Treason and
incitement to Treason by Archbishop Pell which is prohibited under the
Crimes Act in addition to a breach of Section 116 of the Australian
Constitution.
It ought to be self evident that as claim to religious belief it
invalidates claims to Judaeo-Christian and Christian religious belief
associated to marriage as dependency made of an autonomic
transformative prototype associated to religious mysticism, which is a
product of cosmological understanding that has historically been
associated with a HETEROS symbolic understanding of number.
That whilst section 56 (d) of the Anti-Discrimination Act of 1977
stipulates that =93nothing in this Act affects any other act or practice
of a body established to propagate religion that conforms to the
doctrines of that religion or is necessary to avoid injury to the
religious susceptibilities of the adherents of that religion.=94
With respect to the Anti-Discrimination Board=92s assertion that the
complaint has no life within the State of News South Wales due to Soul
Communications being a Western Australian company. This company claims
to be a combined business with 1,100 employees nationally and having
offices in all the major capital cities (although on some
organisational www-pages, there is a disparity as perspective of
this). On a www-page which shares the same 13-prefix service numbers,
with respects to its Interstate counterparts asserts that =93The name
=91soul=92 reflects a truly national telecoms group that they are
today.=94
Indeed within New South Wales, the national telecoms group known as
Soul Communications has 68 listed Dealers of its services.
According to media re****ts of 6 June 2006 [SUPER: #298 / #14 -
Metaphysical Issues/ Praising the Mysterious; I-Ching: H19 -
Approaching; Tetra: #9 - Branching Out / EGO: #346 / #14 -
Metaphysical Issues/ Praising the Mysterious; I-Ching: H19 -
Approaching; Tetra: #9 - Branching Out], Soul Communications as a
leading Australian telecommunications has the contract to create an
IP MLS network for the New South Wales Government=92s $A300 million
broadband project to supply 12,000 series routers which connects a
wide range of agencies in New South Wales.
That I had by my 19 March 2008 complaint to the Anti-Discrimination
Board of New South Wales alleging discrimination by SOUL
Communications Pty Ltd (ABN 99 085 089 970) of GPO BOX 9861 Perth WA
6848 and complaint by other unknown 3rd Parties in the provision of
goods and service on the grounds of homo***uality (Section 49ZP) and
marital status (Section 47) which is prohibited under the Anti-
Discrimination Act 1977 No 48.
Within that do***ent, I conveyed that it is my view that a complaint
made by 3rd parties is the cause for the termination of my Internet
access as =93interference with the operations of the service network,
anyone else=92s enjoyment of their service or which upsets of offends
any person.=94
I have sought an explanation from Soul Communications as whether the
reference =91CN Resolution TIO=92 associated with a credit of $284.85
dated 22 November 2007 as relating to my request to cease my ADSL
Contract. No explanation has been given by representatives from the
Internet Services Provider as to grounds for the disruption of
service, and whether this was due to complaint by unknown 3rd parties
to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman as enforced censor****p by
two candidates in the Federal Election 2007 who are aligned with the
Australian Christian Lobby and has representation within New South
Wales.
By contrast I noted that the Victorian Equal Op****tunity Commission
has made much of the fact that =91a copy of the statement of complaint
being given to the party=92 lays at the very basis of why =93The
Commission cannot receive a complaint that names more than one
unrelated entity.
The reason for this is that a copy of a Statement of Complaint is
always sent to the Respondent.
As the complaint process at the Commission is confidential, no other
entity (other than the Complaint and Respondent) should be notified
that a complaint has been received by the Commission.
For this reason, if you wish to make a complaint against each entity,
without reference to a complaint against any other entity.
Please ensure that any complaint contains only allegations against the
named Respondents.=94
That I am being subject to lack of natural justice by Soul
Communications and I object to the company=92s nationalistic usage of
religious and spiritual symbols as being a breach of my intellectual
property.
That in having demonstrated the complaint does have a life within New
South Wales and that a contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act is
likely to have occurred, the matter is again directed to the Anti-
Discrimination Board of New South Wales for attention.
A telephone call made by the Board could have clarified these matters
earlier.
That independent legal advice about any other course of action that
may be open to me will be held in abeyance till after the Papal state
visit to the State of New South Wales.
- dolf
http://www.grapple.id.au
|
