-- Mr Hatzistergos the bill of rights will protect us from the
mistaken belief your marriage is an act of piety rather than the
State's licensing of immigrant feral fascist dogs.
New South Wales Attorney General John has blocked access to a Law
Reform Commission re****t on recognition and same-*** parenting rights
that has sat in limbo for two years, on the grounds he will table it
in parliament sometime in the future.
Hatzistergos has consistently opposed any further same-***
relation****p recognition in New South Wales, can indefinitely block
the re****t's recommendations from ever becoming public.
"I can't talk about the recommendations I'm afraid", Law Reform
Commissioner Professor Michael Tilbury said.
"We had the same problem when we gave evidence to the Human Rights and
Equal Op****tunity Commission inquiry, we're just not allowed to reveal
our recommendations."
If the example of the Victorian Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights is
anything to go by--such as occurred over my complaint in being
unlawfully arrested on ANZAC Day 2006 due to psycho***ual racialism by
Roman Catholics, mongrelised anglo-celts and Irish who have no loyalty
to the Crown as defender of the faith--this secrecy is due to culture
of dishonesty and the mistaken belief held by the Commission that
their piety is something other than fascist.
The Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission had by letter on 26
April 2007 in laying aside on 24 April 2007 my matters of
=E2EURO~religious
belief/activity discrimination in the area of provision of goods and
services=E2EURO(tm) and =E2EURO~***ual orientation and impairment
discrimina=
tion in
the area of the provision of the goods and services=E2EURO(tm) through the
seeking an =E2EURO~Extension on an Investigation Period=E2EURO(tm) until 8
M=
ay
2007.
During such time the Commission made a determination in another
seemingly unrelated matter involving other parties, as the granting of
a statutory exemption from the prohibition of discrimination under
Section 69 of the Equal Op****tunity Act 1995, to a gay, lesbian
transgender night-club and bar situated at the Sir Robert Peel Hotel
on the corner of Peel Street and Wellington Street, Collingwood.
By such exemption, the club sought to control entry as limited access
on the basis of creating a reserved place and time befitting the
consumptive desires of patrons that was otherwise free of hetero***ist
antagonisms capable of adversely affecting the personality and
conducive atmosphere of this obscurant space.
This is in addition to the exceptions provided to clubs and benefits
for =E2EUROoepeople of a particular age group=E2EURO=9D under Section 62
or =
=E2
EUROoelimit a member=E2EURO(tm)s access to a benefit on the basis of the
mem=
ber=E2
EURO(tm)s *** if it is not practicable for men and women to enjoy the
benefit at the same time=E2EURO=9D or =E2EUROoeeither access to the same
or =
an
equivalent benefit is provided for men and women separately=E2EURO=9D
under
Section 63 of the Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights Act 1995.
This cir***stance was then exacerbated further by the same pub/
nightclub which was granted an exemption that enabled it to designate
an obscurant space that was =E2EUROoefree of hetero***ist antagonisms
capable of adversely affecting the personality and conducive
atmosphere=E2EURO=9D using the unauthorized photograph of an Australian
soldier standing in the fore-ground of the proclaimed sacred precinct
of the Melbourne War Memorial as Shrine of Remembrance within its
advertising for its ANZAC Day activities at this pub/nightclub=E2EURO"that
this soldier was concerned his sensitivities as masculinity,
hetero***uality, integrity and service to the Crown was being maligned
by such ****trayal as betrayal of identity.
It is clear that my ANZAC day (25 April 2006) arrest was associated
with anti-gay prejudice related to Private Jake Kovco=E2EURO(tm)s
death=E2EU=
RO"the
Military Tribunal's initial finding that the death was due to sky-
larking as the inappropriate handling of his weapon. There was the
suggestion that he could have killed himself on 21 April 2006 [Super:
#337 / #31 - Military Strategies as Guides/ Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
=E2EURO" Endurance; Tetra: #51 - Constancy; Ego: #325 / #31 - Military
Strategies as Guides/ Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 =E2EURO" Endurance;
Tetra:
#51 - Constancy] while dancing and joking around to the Cranberries
song titled 'Dream' in a manner described as "(It was) almost to say
this is so gay I would rather be dead."
And saying 'Allahu Akbar (God is Great)' with his unchecked weapon a
9mm pistol in hand=E2EURO"note the military sacred winged caduceus on his
gravestone (situated Sale cemetery) is a claimed compliance with my
own =E2EURO~religious and political belief and activity=E2EURO(tm)
expressed=
in a
Internet accessible do***ent dated 2 April 2006 [Super: #302 / #57 --
Laissez Faire Politics/ Simplicity In Habits; I-Ching: H37 =E2EURO"
Family;
Tetra: #39 - Residence; Ego: #281 / #21 -- Guiding and the Physical/
Emptying the Heart; I-Ching: H31 =E2EURO" Influence; Tetra: #42 - Going to
Meet] and titled =E2EUROoeThe Ninonian Generation of
Ninja-Ninnies=E2EURO=9D=
and
which was delivered by registered post to the Wellington ****re Council
on 20 April 2006 [Super: #401 / #63 - Origins in Reversal/ Consider
Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 =E2EURO" Thunderclap; Tetra: #62 - Doubt; Ego:
#383 / #44 - Moderate Values/ Setting Up Precepts; I-Ching: H1 -
Creative Principle/Heaven; Tetra: #36 - Strength] as response to
Scheme 0601 being a Special Charge Street Construction & Drainage
Works Scheme, proposed by the local Council.
The Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission would have us
believe that in granting the 2007 exemption to a pub/nightclub as
obscurant space which was =E2EUROoefree of hetero***ist antagonisms
capable
of adversely affecting the personality and conducive atmosphere=E2EURO=9D
that it is impudent to then consider the characterization of private
Jake Kovco=E2EURO(tm)s death as =E2EUROoe(It was) almost to say this is so
g=
ay I
would rather be dead=E2EURO=9D being consistent with jingoism as
idiosyncratic psycho***ual racialism of the autonomic right of
Indigenous Dutch Australians perpetuated by Irish, Roman Catholic and
mongrelized anglo-celts who exhibit an unremitting disdain for virtue
and duty to State as the continuing legacy of military incursions by
Captain James Cook.
Two years of this 'cultural disease' as social exclusion and being
subject to silence was sufficient for me to sell up and leave the town
and the region of my birth. The Victorian Equal Oppurtunity and Human
Rights Commission has been complicit in its systematic denial of
justice over the past 21 years of maintaining a culture of religious
motivated racial and ***ual vilification, which by the absence of
means to give substantiation of such irrational religious belief as
aspirational obscurant fideism, amounts to Treason against the
autonomic right under the Commonwealth.
New South Wales Attorney-General John Hatzistergos has distanced
himself from Labour Governments around the country by declaring his
vehement opposition to charters of rights, saying they politicize the
courts and blur the authority of parliament.
In a speech to the Sydney Institute last night, Mr Hatzistergos said,
'professional lobbyists and law school elites' were behind the push
for what he called 'a charter of wrongs'
But High Court Justice Michael Kirby says gay people deserve an
apology or past sodomy laws. Kirby, along with journalist David Marr
were speaking about Anglican faith, ***uality and hurtful gossip at
the liberal St James Church of King Street.
Australians had overcome the challenge of difference and now
celebrated diversity as part of God's gift, he said. Even seeing
other people of television made it harder to hate one another,
including gays and lesbians.
Kirby said he received letters 'from a minister of a rich Sydney
Anglican church' following an interview on ABC radio last December in
which he said anti-gay sentiment came from religion including Sydney's
two Archbishops, Jensen and the Catholic George Pell.
Hatzistergos has said with respect to the federal process for a bill
of rights that it should involve the examination of other models,
'including ones that recognise the principle of parliamentary
sovereignty and seek to better inform it of potential human rights
violations.'
That the Regulative Free Will of Democratic Civil and Decent societies
as the autonomy of will within the Commonwealth as responsive duty to
state and the ethical use of force as obligations placed upon
Australians as participants within that sovereign autonomous entity
viz Section 8 to the Letters Patent of the Australian Constitution of
1901: 'And We do hereby require and command all Our Officers and
Ministers, Civil and Military, and all other the inhabitants of Our
said Commonwealth to be obedient, aiding, and assisting unto Our said
Governor General, or, in the event of his death, incapacity, or
absence, to such person or persons as may, from time to time, under
the provisions of these Our Letters Patent, administer the Government
of Our said Commonwealth.' [Paragraph 8, Letters Patent to the
Australian Constitution by Queen Victoria at Westminster the 29th
October 1900 CE]
Is not the New South Wales Attorney-General John Hatzistergos
therefore required under Section 8 of the Letters Patent to the
Australian Constitution of 1901 to provide substantiation of the
Commonwealth=E2EURO(tm)s definition of marriage as claim to religious
identi=
ty
and how this is differentiated from the Categorical Imperative of 1933
to 1945 as conveyed by the Concordat and those made by the Roman
Catholic Church.
Such lack of action renders the comments made by Hatzistergos that a
Bill of Rights is therefore antagonistic to the Sovereign and
Autonomic requirement under the Commonwealth--as unreasonable on his
part in the mistaken belief that marriage is an act of piety rather
than the State's licensing of immigrant feral fascist dogs.
"Lawyers bear the scars of litigation" he said. "To suggest that
advancement can come about through adversarial litigation where
community values are converted to legal battlefields is, with respect,
both ludicrous and dangerous."
"We do not live in a perfect society and never will. There may well
be laws perceived by some to be unjust in our community.
It is, however, wrong to suggest that they can be remedied by enacting
charters with wide-ranging values and all will be well.'
Mr Hatzistergos said the 'cruz of the problem' was 'the degree to
which the primary power for makign decisions about rights will ****ft
from legislature to courts.'
'By transforming social and political questions into legal ones, a
chart of rights threatens to harm the integrity of both institutions,'
he said.
'It blurs the parliament's authority to decide im****tant political
questions which the public has entrusted to it and for which it has
evolved a sophisticated democratic infrastructure. And it forces the
courts to start making decisions on these same issues, responding to
questions which they are ill-equipped to answer and for which they do
not have democratic legitimacy.'
The need for a Bill of Rights, is no more plainly indicated than in
the Victorian Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission unlawful
conduct within my legal claim which has continued to deny justice.
More recently I have received correspondence from the Victorian Civil
and Administrative Tribunal dated 4 April 2008, which states as
follows:
=E2EUROoePlease find enclosed correspondence [dated 28 January 2008]
received at the Tribunal on various occasions.=E2EURO=A8
=2EJackNote: This #4205, Super: #21 - Guiding and the Physical/ Emptying
the Heart; I-Ching: H31 - Influence; Tetra: #42 - Going to Meet, Ego:
#74 - Controlling Feelings/ Overcome Delusion; I-Ching: H39 -
Obstacles; Tetra: #80 - Labouring, Nuance: #74 - Controlling Feelings/
Overcome Delusion; I-Ching: H39 - Obstacles; Tetra: #80 -
Labouring=E2EURO=
=A8=E2
EURO=A8.Understanding: Male Idea: #21 has 0 Categories.
=E2EURO=A8=E2EURO=A8=
Female Idea:
#74 has 0 Categories.
It appears that this matter has not yet been referred to the Tribunal
from the Equal Op****tunity Commission under the Equal Op****tunity Act
1995 ('the EO Act') or the Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001,
therefore I am returning this do***entation to
you.=E2EURO=A8=E2EURO=A8.Jack=
Note:
This #21067, Super: #2 - Contrast of Terms/ Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11
- Peace; Tetra: #16 - Contact, Ego: #7 - Intentional Reversal/ Dimming
Radiance; I-Ching: H12 - Stagnation; Tetra: #56 - Closed Mouth,
Nuance: #81 - Making the Essence Clear/ Propounding the Essential; I-
Ching: H11 - Peace; Tetra: #15 - Reach=E2EURO=A8
=2EUnderstanding: Male Idea: #23 has 0 Categories.
=E2EURO=A8=E2EURO=A8Femal=
e Idea:
#81 has 0 Categories.
You may wish to contact the Equal Op****tunity [and] Human Rights
Commission...=E2EURO=A8
=2EJackNote: This #6972, Super: #38 - Consequences for Virtuosity/
Discourse of Virtue; I-Ching: H62 - Small Excess; Tetra: #11 -
Divergence, Ego: #6 - Superiority of the Female/ Completion of Form; I-
Ching: H25 - Innocence; Tetra: #66 - Departure, Nuance: #6 -
Superiority of the Female/ Completion of Form; I-Ching: H25 -
Innocence; Tetra: #66 - Departure
=2EUnderstanding: Male Idea: #61 has 0 Categories.
=E2EURO=A8=E2EURO=A8Femal=
e Idea:
#87 has 0 Categories.
Included within this returned correspondence are additional letters
from me dated 23 February 2008, 10 March 2008, 11 March 2008 and 26
March 2008. These complaints relate to the Victorian Equal
Op****tunity and Human Rights Commissions File No: 30667333 (Telstra),
and File No: 3064395 (Seventh-day Adventist Church) and File No:
3063670 (AXA Group Insurance).
The matters were initially referred to the Victorian Civil and
Administrative Tribunal specifically on the grounds that the Equal
Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission claimed that my request for
the Commission to refer matters to the Tribunal were not clear enough=E2
EURO"Specifically the statement as paragraph 59 of my 27 November 2007:
=E2EUROoeAccordingly under section 108(2) of the Equal Op****tunity Act, I
may in writing, within 60 days of having receiving the notice of the
Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission=E2EURO(tm)s 26 September
2007
decision, request that the Commission to refer this Complaint against
Telstra to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, Anti-
Discrimination List for hearing.
I have similarly made a request by letter dated 16 June 2007 with
respect to my complaints of =E2EURO~Religious Belief/Activity
Discrimination=E2EURO(tm) Against AXA Insurance Australia Limited (FILE
No.
3063670 #7) and =E2EURO~Impairment and ***ual Orientation
Discrimination=E2E=
URO(tm)
Against the Seventh Day Adventist Church as entity situated Stawell
Street Sale, Victoria of Australian Union Conference Limited (File No.
3064396 #4).=E2EURO=9D
The relevant section 108(2) of the Equal Op****tunity Act states, =E2
EUROoewithin 60 days after receiving the Commission=E2EURO(tm)s notice
decli=
ning
to entertain a complaint, the complainant, by written notice, may
require the Commission to refer the complaint to the Tribunal for
hearing under Division 7=E2EURO=9D
Sub-section 3 and 4 further stipulates: =E2EUROoe(3) The Commission must
comply with a notice under sub-section (2). (4) If the complainant
does not notify the Commission under sub-section (2), the Commission
may dismiss the complaint and the complaint may take no further action
under this Act in relation to the subject matter of the
complaint.=E2EURO=9D=
That such statements made by me do constitute a clear request of
referral of the matters to the Victorian Civil and Administrative
Tribunal.
The Commission=E2EURO(tm)s view is contrary to plain reading of the
legislation. Namely section 108(4): =E2EUROoeIf the complainant does not
notify the Commission under sub-section (2), the Commission may
dismiss the complaint and the complainant may take no further action
under this Act in relation to the subject matter of the
complaint.=E2EURO=9D=
That if the complainant notifies the Commission within 60 days of =E2
EURO~RECEIVING=E2EURO(tm) the Commission=E2EURO(tm)s notice in writing
decli=
ning to
entertain a complaint, the complainant, by written notice made under
subsection 108(2) is clearly requiring the Commission to refer the
complaint to the Tribunal for hearing under Division 7. That if the
complainant does not notify the Commission in writing, there is no
intention to require the complaint to be referred.
But clearly, if a complainant in writing under the auspices of =E2EURO~MAY
REQUIRE the Commission to refer the complaint to the Tribunal=E2EURO(tm).
That the words =E2EUROoeI MAY IN WRITING ... REQUEST THAT THE COMMISSION
TO
REFER THOSE COMPLAINTS TO THE TRIBUNAL=E2EURO(tm) constitutes such a
request=
when made in accordance with sub-section 108(2)
And that such a response as a clear request made to the Commission and
undertaken by Registered Post delivery effective 4 December 2007, is
not only within the 60 day timeframe designated upon having received
on 5 October 2007, the Commission=E2EURO(tm)s notice of 26 September 2007
declining the complaint.
That the continuing prevarication by the Equal Op****tunity and Human
Rights Commission is now a generational trans-substantive
justification, obscurification and denial of my natural and common law
rights=E2EURO"In that the 4 December 2007 date is within the boundary of
statute of limitations with respect to Mr. Peter Riddell as legal
counsel for AXA Group Insurance=E2EURO(tm)s letter dated 4 December 2001
to
VCAT requesting an extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December 2001.
Furthermore the Commission claims my correspondence of 4 December 2007
requesting referral of the matters under sub-section 108(2) conveyed
by File No. 3063670 and 3064396 to VCAT was received after the
statutory 60 days referral period had lapsed and the Commission has no
capacity to refer your complaint to VCAT.
And suggested if I wish to pursue redress of this matter at VCAT I am
required to contact the Tribunal in order to apply for an extension of
time under s 126 (1) of the Victoria Civil and Administrative Tribunal
Act 1998 (Vic).
That the Commission was waiting any advice from VCAT as to whether my
complaint conveyed by those respective Files may be referred for
hearing.
The comment by the Senior Registrar for VCAT dated 4 April 2008 fails
to enter into any reasoning as to whether the complaint can in fact be
referred, beyond implying a right a referral=E2EURO"in that it has not
been
referred to the Tribunal from the Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights
Commission under the Equal Op****tunity Act 1995 or the Racial and
Religious Tolerance Act 2001.
I have by letter of 10 March 2008 advised the Senior Registrar for
VCAT and the Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission of my
departure from the State of Victoria due to continuing instances of
corruption, denial of justice and religious, racial and ***ual
vilification perpetuated by the Victoria Police and the Equal
Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission=E2EURO"and hoped that the matters
which I have clearly requested for referral to VCAT (an action which
they have acknowledged by returning such correspondence to me) could
be expedited.
Having not heard from either organization by 26 March 2008 I have
sought under this alternate State jurisdiction to proceed with a
secondary strategy to seek resolution to these outstanding matters
which have now proceeded for an unacceptable protracted time period.
I have initiated this by corresponding directly to the Insurer and
demanded that they meet their obligations under the Contract of
Insurance by according me procedural fairness with respect to the
three outstanding items pertaining to Mr Peter Riddell as legal
counsel for the Insurer conduct as grounds for the extra-ordinary
hearing of 7 December 2001 as the non-existent justification for the
injury, permanent psychological harm perpetuated and resultant public
excoriation which also occasioned the insubstantial grounds for the
suspension of my salary continuance on 19 June 2000 and 20 November
2006.
I further refer you to correspondence titled =E2EURO~Big Bang In Theory
and
Practice: Allahu Akbar or Ali BaBa Magic?=E2EURO(tm) which is outlined in
publicly accessible Internet based do***ents at the following URL:
-- http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/bigBang.html
This do***ent gives complete and final substantiation of my activities
and conduct within superannuated retirement as past responses to the
Insurer and justification of my legal claim against them. And is
related to Martin Heidegger's 1931/1932 lectures on Being and Time
(one can easily see that if he did not regard the Sabbath of the Jews,
how a Nhilistic mind and attitude could possess such a culture) as his
summation of the philosophers Hegel (1770-1831 CE) and Kant (1724=E2
EURO"1804 CE) wherein he gives a conception of 'Logos as Infinity and its
logical grounding in Chronos', the 'Contradiction of a thing' relating
to the autonomic transformative prototype as Heteros (marriage) and
'finite and absolute cognition' (which is of relevance to Madam Deputy
President Kate MacKenzie as a blind person, being an incapable and
improper person to preside over a VCAT hearing and that there is an
implied impunity in her determinations: that if she isn=E2EURO(tm)t
disabled=
,
why should I be) with respect to marriage laws and the Sabbath=E2EURO"that
are especially relevant to the view of the Federal Government's 2004
passage of the Marriage laws as being equivalent to German Fascism:
'marriage means the union of a male and female to the exclusion of all
others, voluntarily entered into for life' made to the Marriage and
Family Law Act
That I have formally advised the Insurer that they have not at any
time adequately addressed the issues as once again detailed in my
correspondence of 26 March 2008. In light of Heidegger=E2EURO(tm)s
Philosophical assertions as substantiation of my claim related to
philosophical pursuits, accordingly Mr. Riddell=E2EURO(tm)s conduct
amounts =
to
perjury and the actions by Mark Capecchi and Katharina Stojakovic is
conduct that is a persecution of the autonomic right under the
Commonwealth.
That the continued, habitual and absolute refusal by the Insurer to
give an adequate explanation for its conduct as obligations under the
contract is a situational arrogance and aloofness as feigned
superiority which typically is claimed and bestowed en masse by the
Roman Catholic Church as a culture of religious motivated racial and
***ual vilification, which by the absence of means to give
substantiation of such irrational religious belief as aspirational
obscurant fideism, amounts to Treason against the autonomic right
under the Commonwealth.
This is the essential character Mark Capecchi, Katharina Stojakovic
and the Insurer=E2EURO(tm)s employees exhibit in this country as
immigrants
(they are not alone in this), which may be more appropriately termed
not a 'cultural cringe' but a 'cultural disease'--a disorder of
structure or function in a human quality, habit or disposition
regarded as adversely affecting a person or group of people and
especially one that produces specific signs or symptoms or that
affects a specific location.
Accordingly, the matter as complaint against AXA Group Insurance=E2EURO"as
I have advised them=E2EURO"has by letter dated 8 April 2008 been forwarded
to legal representatives for appropriate action relating to breach of
contract and the awarding of appropriate costs and damages.
Should the outstanding matters before the Equal Op****tunity and Human
Rights Commission not be adequately dealt with by the time of the
conclusion of this matter of breach of contract=E2EURO"Then this
continuing
un-civil and indecent conduct by the Commission which is entirely
antagonistic delinquency to the 'right of humanity in his own person'
as the reasonable desire, moral responsibility and duty accorded to
democratic regulative free-will and pre-requisite to any presence,
participation and procreation as marriage right and duties within the
Commonwealth of Australia=E2EURO"will be responded to with an appropriate
legal claim made against the Commission and its members.
Or will the Victorian Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission
continue to deny justice as they did over my ANZAC Day 2006 unlawful
arrest by making my legal claim a casualty of Victoria's proposed
legislation for the same *** relation****ps register as less that human
rights.
- dolf
http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/bigBang.html
|
