In article <d479b70f-34df-4949-8977-
1edd9ed13a5d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, dolfboek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> A strange thing happened today at 1030 hours on 29 March 2008.
You chose not to post unreadable **** to aus.tv, whilst waiting for=20
death?
>=20
> http://www.grapple.id.au/angels.html?time=3D10.30?date=3D2008.3.29
>=20
> I'd just departed from home, after changing from my clothes I wore to
> attend Sydney's Synagogue in Elizabeth Street (once again and for the
> third time, I refused to enter because of the security presence), when
> a male practititioner of the Sikh faith came up to me and shook my
> hand.
>=20
bugger... apparently not
> He said, "You are a very lucky man."
>=20
> I said, "Yes, I know and I am a religious one also."
>=20
> He repeated, "You are a very lucky man."
>=20
> I responded, "I'll tell you why, I own a mathematical model to the
> Torah and the Dao Te Ching."
>=20
> He said, "You do?"
>=20
> I retorted, "But I'm not as lucky as you, since you have now met me."
>=20
Oh ho ho, the hilarity, bet the poor bastard doesn't think he's so
lucky=20
now..
> The night before a similar thing happened, when a blok came up to me
> and said, "Welcome back!" But that was a 'crystal' dealer on the look
> out for customers looking to score.
>=20
Bloks are strange that way. Was it a healing crystal?
> Instead, I bought the Australian newspaper and found out my name
> wasn't included amongst the Australia2020 delegates. I briefly
> chatted to the blond behind the counter and said that I had upset the
> Australian Jewish Community, by asking them why they have never
> expressed outrage at the Commonwealth's Marriage laws which are
> indistguishable from German Fascism.
>=20
> She said that subject was too deep for her. At least she make a good
> coffee--I thought allowing her grace.
Hahah she actually thuoght "get this weird arsehole far far away from=20
me, his self-indulgant crap is just insane, buy the coffee and leave,=20
now"
>=20
> The problem is that the same Roman Imperial/Religious governance had
> no intention of being benevolent in its recognition of autonomic
> governance and by 80 CE had constructed the Roman Colosseum and put to
> death all those who detracted from it--a travesty really and
> especially given, that unlike the 'OTH cycle of the Everlasting
> Covenant, the Julian calendar had an imprecise leap year intercalation
> which was only rectified by the Gregorian calendar reforms of 1582 CE.
>=20
Nice segway, Chaser will be round shortly.
> 7 AUTONOMIC PRINCIPLES
> 1. Formula of Universal Law as Sovereignty / Remember the Sabbath
> {3W1D}
> -- The union of a man and a woman
> 2. (MOTHER) Formula of Humanity as Head of State / Honor Parents
> -- to the exclusion of all others,
> 3. Formula of Autonomy as Individual / Do not Kill
> -- voluntarily
> 4. Formula of Progression / Avoid Spiritual Adultery as Heteronomy
> Against Autonomy {50J} [John 5:43-47]
> -- entered into for life.
> 5. Discriminating Norm (Human Nature) as Objective grounding of
> infinity / Do not Steal {72J + 3(3=B2+1)/2}
> -- How is Australian Fascism as 'formal definition of mono-gamous gamo-
> genesis' and piety 'monogenes' [John 1:17-18] any different from
> German Fascism?
> 6. (MOTHER - MARRIAGE?) Binding Norm (Norma Obligans), as Subjective
> grounding of infinity / Do not Bear False Witness {Autonomic
> transformative prototype as HETEROS symbolic associator to series #15,
> #34, #65, #111, #175, #260, #369 ... #2000 / Y2K}
> 7. Manifesting Norm (Norma Denuntians) / Do not Covet {Can they any
> longer make a claim to Christian Identity? Given the Equinox of
> DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * 364) + 182 days =3D Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12)
> with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year
> of 'oth cycle}
>=20
> That there exists a comprehension of autonomic principles of Nature
> such as the seventh-day Sabbath keepers of the Everlasting Covenant
> with its 'oth cycle of 1092 days from which it is deduced that 6J =3D
> 294 x 364 days or 293 x 365.2425 topical years as 107016 days:
>=20
> D =3D 364 x 6 or 2184 days, W =3D 6D x 7, J =3D 6D x 49 =3D 107016 days
a=
s 294
> years x 364 or 293 years x 365.2425
>=20
> 22/7 as 3W1D ... {Formula of Progression of individual phenomena}
>=20
> the major premise {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
> Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 x 13 =3D 2184 days of
> the 'oth cycle =3D 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the 'constant sequence of
> sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation =3D 1092 days x 2 =3D
218=
4
> days
>=20
> the minor premise {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
> Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
> law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 =3D 6J or
> 294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
> March 1996 / 21 March =3D 1 Nisan 5756; and
>=20
> the conclusion {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of
> Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), that is laid down as
> right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 topical years as 122J3W1D + 9(9=B2
> +1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18
> September =3D 1 Tishri 5762.
>=20
> Yesterday I took my 'awkward self' for a walk past Mrs Macquaire's
> Chair, which provides one of the best vantage points in Sydney.
I'm sure you take your 'awkward-self, repeatedly.
>=20
> If the sun is ****ning I like to take my ****rt off and walk semi-****d.
> And just past the place which marks where Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth
> dis-embarked in Her first visit to Australia in 1956 there was a
> wedding party and a harpist playing.
>=20
> The wedding party was absent when I initially passed by, but upon my
> return I felt it appropriate to dress myself as I passed by the gaze
> of the wedding assembled wedding party. A proper thing to to I thought
> as that same day an artist lost under a colourful jumper has won the
> inaugural $10,000 National Youth Self ****trait Award.
> http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23445571-2702,00.html
>=20
> I couldn't help but think of the President Nicolas Sarkozy and his new
> wife Carla Bruni-Sarkozy (a celebrity and fascist's whore) and how
> indecent his two day State visit to Britain on 26 March 2008. That
> the French President Sarkozy had previously agreed a deal with Idriss
> D=E9by, his Chadian counterpart, to bring Six French aid workers on
> trial in Chad and charged with attempting to kidnap 103 African
> children on a humanitarian mission which ended in fiasco.
I would've simply thought of wild-***, riding my mountain bike, or=20
killing strangers, your thoughts are infinitely more boring.
>=20
> The charity workers back to Paris next week under an agreement which
> will enable them to serve their sentences in France. Speaking from his
> prison cell before the hearing, Eric Br=E9teau, 36, the founder of Zoe's
> Ark, described the legal process as a "mascarade".
>=20
> The members of the French charity Zoe's Ark who appeared in court in
> N'Djamena along with their alleged accomplices, three Chadians and a
> Sudanese man, face a maximum sentence of 20 years in jail if found
> guilty.
>=20
> They were arrested in October as they prepared to fly out of eastern
> Chad with children whom they depicted as orphans from Darfur, the war-
> torn region of neighbouring Sudan. Investigators say that the children
> are, in fact, Chadian and most have at least one parent.
>=20
> That what the French have tried by whatever means to create a public-
> image that they have no empathy with German Fascism of 1933-1945 in
> its governance of heteronomy by autonomy, whether this has been by
> kidnapping children on the pretence that they are orphans in a war
> torn and AIDS stricken Africa or by marriage (rather than copulation
> by act of nature) is somehow made acceptable by being contrasted to
> ****ity as act of nature.
>=20
> I enclose below a letter dated 26 March 2008 which coincides with the
> French President's sent by Registered Post to the Insurer AXA Global
> Group with respect to heteronomy against my autonomy perpetuated by
> them as habitual, purposeful and continual conduct of accusation and
> defamation.
>=20
> There is absolutely no likelihood of my returning to work whilst these
> issues remain unresolved.
Hmm im****tant issues too. Well im****tant to your psychiatrist, in a=20
kind of 'institutionalise immediately' type of way.
>=20
> That I own as my intellectual property a claim to and substantiation
> of Judaeo-Christian and Christian religious belief which is not
> antagonistic to my identity as a homo***ual male in their 21st year of
> managed HIV infection.
>=20
> Mr. Andrew Penn, Chief Executive Officer
> AXA Group Insurance
> PO Box 4927 VV
> Melbourne Victoria 8060
>=20
> Wednesday, 26 March 2008 [SUPER: #377 / #74 - Controlling Feelings/
> Overcome Delusion; I-Ching: H39 - Obstacles; Tetra: #80 - Labouring /
> EGO: #375 / #74 - Controlling Feelings/ Overcome Delusion; I-Ching:
> H39 - Obstacles; Tetra: #80 - Labouring]
>=20
> With respect to AXA Insurance Australia Limited, as complaint of
> discrimination on the basis of religious belief or activity in area of
> the provision of goods and services made to the Equal Op****tunity and
> Human Rights Commission as File No. 3063670.
>=20
> That the Group Salary Continuance claim 0004/283 as benevolence made
> under this policy has not been received for the period 20 February
> 2008 to 19 March 2008.
>=20
> To ease the administrative burden upon the Insurer I have in the past
> acquiesced to the consideration that it is sufficient for such
> benevolence to be paid to me on the 25th day of the month. I have not
> received the salary benevolence by the due date of 25 March 2008 and
> accordingly the Insurer is in breach of the terms and conditions of
> the policy.
>=20
> That this has occurred despite my advising the Insurer by letter of 3
> March 2008 [SUPER: #281 / #32 - Natural Guide/ Virtue of Holiness; I-
> Ching: H44 - Coming On; Tetra: #43 - Encounters / EGO: #491 / #53 -
> Increasing Evidence/ Gaining Insight; I-Ching: H13 - Companion****p;
> Tetra: #53 - Eternity] of my new tem****ary address for correspondence
> as: 18/8 A HUGHES STREET, POTTS POINT NSW 2011 and that there is
> presently no change to my banking arrangements.
>=20
> Invariably this cir***stance has arisen due to the Insurer being
> closed for business during the protracted Easter period from Good
> Friday 21 March [SUPER: #274 / #13 - Status/ Loathing Shame; I-Ching:
> H5 - Delay; Tetra: #17 - Holding Back / EGO: #436 / #13 - Status/
> Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Delay; Tetra: #17 - Holding Back] until
> Easter Monday 24 March [SUPER: #397 / #49 - Sage's Constancy/ Trust in
> Virtue; I-Ching: H3 - Initial Difficulties; Tetra: #4 - Barrier / EGO:
> #449 / #69 - Profound Use/ Function of the Mysterious; I-Ching: H34 -
> Strength of Greatness; Tetra: #22 - Resistance] as being consistent
> with a Cor****ate claim made of religious values and belief.
>=20
> Furthermore, I expressed my concerns in relation to the Contract of
> Insurance, that "I believe the conduct of the Insurer with respect to
> [a continuing, purposeful and habitual] lack of accountability over
> its slanderous characterization of me, to be persecution of the
> autonomic right.
>=20
> I believe the Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights Commission to have
> been prejudicial and have perpetuated--in accordance with their social
> engineering dictums, a denial of justice.
>=20
> Accordingly I have abandoned any prospect of remaining within the
> State of Victoria whilst in superannuated retirement and have sought
> refuge in a more amenable jurisdiction."
>=20
> With respect to the Insurer meeting its obligations under the Contract
> of Insurance and my being accorded procedural fairness, the following
> clarifications are sought from the Insurer:
>=20
> a) =09For the Insurer to provide such statements and do***ents as
> necessary to substantiate the sufficient cause as the justification of
> the substantiating grounds for the application submitted to the 7
> December 2001 Tribunal Hearing, that the earlier Directions Orders,
> which were in effect at the time, should be short-circuited and the
> matter ought to be dealt with at that instance. As misrepresentation
> of two telephone calls dealing with a subject of a religious nature
> and made to the Insurer in good faith: 'I am not sure that intention
> is entirely relevant. It is the manner in which I reasonably
> interpreted those phone messages. Here is a transcript before the
> court. I was threatened by Mr. Boek, who by his conduct today and in
> the past, on any object view appears to be unstable, I think it
> inappropriate that this matter be continued.'
>=20
> I can give full justifications for those telephone calls as
> substantiation given of Judaeo-Christian/Christian identity and
> relating to my religious and philosophical pursuits in superannuated
> retirement. These are outlined in publicly accessible Internet based
> do***ents at the following URL:
>=20
You couldn't justifty a good dump, you're just raving gibbering idiot.
=20
Stop annoying people and die.
> Mission Accomplished: My Crown of Thorns and God's Departure of Soul
> -- http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/missionAccomplished.html
>=20
> Course-TROCHOS of nature-GENESIS or world-KOSMOS of iniquity-ADIKIA?
> -- http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/naturalCourse.html
>=20
> Who's Your Daddy?
> -- http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/whoseDaddy.html
>=20
> Consequentially there is no need for me to provide them to you in
> printed or any other form.
>=20
> b)=09For the Insurer to provide such statements and do***ents as
> necessary to substantiate the sufficient cause as the justification of
> the substantiating grounds as claimed 'breaches of the terms and
> conditions of your policy' to effect the withholding of past due
> payment of salary benevolence which "had been suspended effective from
> 19 June 2000."
>=20
> The religious/political adoption of marriage as dependency made of an
> autonomic transformative prototype associated to religious mysticism,
> is a product of cosmological understanding to which the names of the
> days of the week apply {ie. as formula of progression of magic squares
> #3 (sum =3D 15) - Saturn; #4 (sum =3D 34) - Jupiter; #5 (sum =3D 65) -
Ma=
rs;
> #6 (sum =3D 111) - Sun; #7 (sum =3D 175) - Venus; #8 (sum =3D 260) -
> Mercury; #9 (sum =3D 369) - Luna} which has historically been associated
> with an alternate HETEROS symbolic understanding of number.
>=20
> This is consistent with representations made by me to the Insurer's
> nominated independent medical practitioner: "[27] Furthermore, it was
> out of concern for giving a complete justification for my day-to-day
> activities and intellectual and esoteric pursuit as philological
> investigation and development of a supernal number based and rational
> model, which I showed Dr. Baker as a particular subject matter
> addressed by a book. As a treatise on Reason, the book articulates two
> treatises of an alternate understanding of the Pythagorean cosmology
> given as 'Theory of Number' and 'From One to Ten - A Treatise on the
> origin and extension of the prime manifestation on the physical
> plane.'
>=20
> ...
>=20
> [33] My life had become solitary and quietly reflective within an
> environment purpose built to sustain retirement. I occupy my time in
> spiritual contemplation and engaging in spiritual discussion groups.
> I showed him [this aforementioned] book on the subject of the
> Philosopher's Stone {ie. the [septet] form 9(92+1)/2 =3D #369 as vMeme/
> Moment matrix}--an imaginary substance or preparation believed capable
> of transmuting baser metals into gold or silver, and of prolonging
> life. Having accepted the fatality of my life cir***stance, this is
> the only matter to which my mind attends as my field of enriching
> interest in retirement.
>=20
> [34] Dr. Baker asked if I did any public presentations or speaking
> engagements on this topic of interest. I informed him that I confined
> my involvement to Internet discussion groups, from which I maintain
> chapter characterizations of the discourses on my homepage--Such
> characterizations, the Insurer has subsequently complained are
> voluminous and as grounds for dismissal of my complaint before the
> Tribunal. There is a public newsgroup record of my now 9 years of
> Internet activity as religious based newsgroup discourses, together
> with the accompanying treatise relating to the [septet] #369 vMeme/
> Moment Matrix further substantiates my claim.
>=20
> [35] This model is do***ented on my WWW-page as my e-mail
> participation in the development, articulation and conveyance of a
> mathematical, chronological, psychological, autonomous, isonomic and
> taxonomical model {vMeme/Moment Cube Matrix} which was devised from
> many years of philological research, as a transcendental means to
> investigate, do***ent, tranquilize and negate religiously derived
> terrorism."
>=20
> c) =09For the Insurer to provide such statements and do***ents as
> necessary to substantiate the sufficient cause as the justification of
> the substantiating grounds as claimed 'breaches of the terms and
> conditions of your policy' to effect the withholding of past due
> payment of salary benevolence which "have been suspended effective
> from 20 November 2006."
>=20
> There is under the Commonwealth, an issue of lack of separation of
> Church and State with respect to the performance of marriage
> ceremonies. That marriage, rather than being regarded as an act of
> nature by copulation, is an autonomic transformative prototype
> associated to religious mysticism, which is a product of cosmological
> understanding that has historically been associated with a HETEROS
> symbolic understanding of number--that this conflicts with claims to
> Judaeo-Christian and Christian religious identity based on the
> cosmological understanding of the attribution of Nature known as the
> Sabbath day and the 'OTH cycle of the Everlasting Covenant.
>=20
> That the Insurer's claimed 'breaches of the terms and conditions of
> your policy' relates to my failure to attend a medical appointment due
> to Independent Medical Examiners for the Insurer failing to adequately
> clarify how their individual or organizational views of Marriage is
> differentiated from the Natural Law claim articulated by the 4
> Nuremberg Laws introduced from 15 September 1935 as the basis for
> Natural Law's rule of conduct against the Natural law and Common Law
> sovereign and autonomous right of the Jews--And similarly of
> homo***uality, which was politically viewed as not only detrimental to
> natural population growth, but harmful to the nation's strength and
> family life, being denounced by a Political Party Purge in 30 June
> 1934.
>=20
> That this follows upon the August 2004 passage of the Marriage
> Legislation Amendment Bill as an Act to amend the Commonwealth
> Marriage Act 1961 and Family Law Act 1975, with a formal monogamous
> definition of gamogenesis as: "marriage means the union of a man and a
> woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for
> life."
>=20
> That Legal Representatives for the Insurer are capable of making a
> values statement with respect to "USE OF FORCE" and of "MARRIAGE" as
> "MATTERS IN RELATION TO PROCEEDINGS" of "FILE NO. A500/2000" and the
> unsubstantiated justifications for an extra-ordinary hearing of the
> Victorian Civil Administrative Tribunal on 7 December 2001.
>=20
> Accordingly the Insurer has a duty under the contract, to provide
> clarification of these three outstanding matters in relation to
> marriage, with respect to the policy within sub clause 1.10 conveying
> a natural and common law definition of spouse as meaning 'husband or
> wife and defacto spouse'. A defacto spouse is defined within 1.11 as
> meaning: 'a person who living with another person of the opposite ***
> as the spouse of that person on a bona fide domestic basis although
> not legally married to that other person.'
>=20
> As there exists no substantiating grounds, by which the Insurer and
> its employees can make of Judaeo-Christian or Christian identity, and
> given the lack of separation of Church and State with respect to the
> performance of marriage ceremonies--the Insurers conduct with respect
> to administering the Contract of Insurance can only be of
> indeterminate, hypocritical and questionable moral and ethical
> integrity.
>=20
> I have expressed my wish to proceed on my claim of breach of contract
> against the Insurer and accordingly sought advice as to legal
> representation for this to proceed.
>=20
and you'll fail, but not before you'll bore the crap out of us with
more=20
thrilling thoughts and adventures....
> - dolf
>=20
> http://www.grapple.id.au
>=20
>=20
>=20


|