On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:58:33 -0800 (PST), dolf wrote:
> Further to our discussion on a Common Gematria Form for the Hebrew
> plus long vowels Final qames He/A (-1), sere Yod/E (-5), hireq Yod/I
> (-9), full Holem/O (-60), sureq/U (-300)
>
> That my teleological statement cir***scribing the Letters Patent to
> the Australian Constitution of 1901 and the teleological argument in
> sup****t of the origin of the English language expressed in association
> to a PRIVATE PARKING RIGHT (Layer #9) and property as CARRIAGEWAY in
> common with THE TELSTRA EXCHANGE (Layer #8) in compliance to the
> implied HYPONOMIC / HYPERNOMIC requirements of the NOMARCHY (Layers #1
> to #7) associated to CROWN LAND ALLOTMENTS, ought not in any way
> mitigate the obligations to Section 8 by others.
<snip>
Hi Dolf,
I'm interested in knowing what the purpose of your research/work is.
It seems to involve the Commonwealth Constitution, elements of Egyptology,
theology, semantics/linguistics, and a lot of other perhaps superficially
disparate subjects.
What are you attempting to show by your "teleological statement"?
And what is a "grapple noumenon"?
Horry.
|
