Further to the last, it seems that the gemantic value #348 appears to
be the thematic basis for the prophecy of Isaiah 37:26
#348
#2 #90 #200 #6 #50 Citadel, fortress
#8 #40 #300 To be sharp, bold, strong; to arm the loins; to arm
oneself; five; loins, waist; a fifth, to tax one fifth
#8 #90 #200 #10 #40 Trumpeters
#8 #200 #90 #50 Grape seeds; sour grapes
#8 #300 #40 To be bright, to be affluent; alert
#40 #2 #6 #300 The parts of shame; *****
#40 #6 #300 #2 A seat; a site or situation; a sitting or session; a
dwelling; a tarrying or stay; dwellers, inhabitants
#40 #8 #100 #200 Exploration, a hidden or deep place, inmost
recess
#40 #200 #8 #100 Remoteness, distance
#40 #200 #100 #8 Perfume, aromatic herb
#40 #300 #3 #5 A misleader or deceiver
#40 #300 #3 #5 An error
#40 #300 #8 To streak or spread over, to paint; to consecrate by
unction, to anoint
#40 #300 #8 To measure or ****tion out
It is difficult to deny that the later Chinese philosopher Wang-Bi's
(226-249 CE) metaphysical commentaries on both the Book of Changes (I-
Ching) and Lao Tzu's Tao (the way) Te (of virtue) Ching (and
causality) as the articulation of original non-being which finds its
attainment in the One of 'long, long ago' (cf: Heb. Qedem yom yatsar
-- "Have you not heard what I did long ago to Pharaoh king of Egypt
because he ruled over them? Against you also the prophets of Israel
prophesied, and you did not repent. This was foreseen for you before
me from days of old to do to you, and I also planned it. Now I will
bring it to pass, and this has been for stumbling to you, because
fortified cities have been before you as a tumult of waves that
subside, while their inhabitants, their force shorn, are shattered and
confounded, and have become like plants of the fields and like tender
grass [Alt: green herb], and like grass on the housetops which is
singed [Alt: as grain blighted] before it comes to be ears.
There is disclosed before me your sitting down in counsel [ie.
dwellingplace as the perspective that the Category of Understanding
#348 as notionally represented in Philo of Alexandria's writings has a
linkage to the Julian Calendar on 3, 9 and 10 August et al, and is
associated to #435 and the Crown of Thorns worn by Jesus] and your
going out to wage war and your coming in to the land of Israel, and
there is disclosed that you rage before me." [Copyright 1990 The Order
of Siant Benedict, Aramaic Targum of Isaiah 37:26]): "One is the
beginning of numbers and the ultimate number of things. Each thing, as
such, is produced by the one [Unity] and this is why it is the master
of them all [Multiplicity]" [#39 - Achieving Oneness/ The Root of
Order], actually finds its conception within the Jewish metaphysical
Kabbalistic literature known as the Sefer Yetzirah: "Ten Sefirot of
Nothingness {ie. the number of ten fingers, five opposite five with a
singular covenant [1:3]} Their end is imbedded in their beginning and
their beginning in their end like a flame in a burning coal. For the
Master is singular he has no second and before One, what do you
count?" [Sefer Yetzirah 1:7]
- dolf
http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/Chronicles/ICreate.html
On Aug 11, 12:19 pm, dolf <dolfb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> My dear Jewish friends,
>
> I was poking about Philo of Alexandria's writings which I have long
> suspected that there is a Kabbalistic encyclical architecture which
> underpins his works.
>
> For example: "...teach those initiated persons who are worthy of the
> knowledge of the most sacred mysteries, the whole nature of such
> divine and secret ordinances."
>
> There appears to have been a savage contention as hatred between the
> Judaeo-Christian Apostle Paul and other Jewish Hellenists and in
> exploring this I stumbled across the Gematric value #348 as a possible
> theme to Philo's writing regarding: On Virtues and Cherubim.
>
> http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/kangarujack/interrogator/jack...
>
> The hypothesis I'd like to advance is that #348 which has tem****al
> relation****ps to the dates:
>
> 3 August
> 9 August
> 10 August
>
> might be the theological basis and mechanism for his Embassy to
> Emperor Caligula and in so doing having sold out the Judaism to Roman
> governance:
>
> Nous: #42 (E: #348, S: #382), Plane: 4
>
> Time: 09:15 hrs
> Date: 10 August, 2007
> Torah: #300 + #1 + #5 =3D #306
> Tao: #42 - Generating Things/ Reason's Modifications
> I-Ching: H60 - Restraint
> Mystery: #52 - Measure
> EGO: #348
>
> # 40 / #40 - Reversal/ Avoiding Activity
> # 80 / #40 - Reversal/ Avoiding Activity
> #142 / #62 - Construing a Guide/ Practise Reason
> #184 / *42 - Generating Things/ Reason's Modifications
> #218 / #34 - Great Guide/ Trust in its Perfection
> #228 / #10 - Impossible Advice/ What can Be Done?
> #273 / #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue
> #327 / #54 - Culturing Perspectives/ Cultivation of Intuition
> #348 / #21 - Guiding and the Physical/ Emptying the Heart
>
> SUPER: #382
>
> # 40 / #40 - Reversal/ Avoiding Activity
> #120 / #80 - Primitivist Independence/ Remaining in Isolation
> #181 / #61 - Virtuosity at Using 'Beneath'/ Virtue of Humility
> #203 / *22 - Point to Reversal?/ Humility's Increase
> #259 / #56 - Abstruse Virtuosity/ Virtue of the Mysterious
> #325 / #66 - Strategic Reversal/ Putting Oneself Behind
> #355 / #30 - Government without Coercion/ Be Chary of War
> #358 / # 3 - Prescriptions for Politics/ Keeping the People Quiet
> #382 / #24 - Im****tant Distinctions/ Trouble from Indulgence
>
> Nous: #32 (E: #351, S: #348), Plane: 3
>
> Time: 09:10 hrs
> Date: 09 August, 2007
> Torah: #80 + #5 + #30 =3D #115
> Tao: #32 - Natural Guide/ Virtue of Holiness
> I-Ching: H44 - Coming On
> Mystery: #43 - Encounters
> EGO: #351
>
> # 14 / #14 - Metaphysical Issues/ Praising the Mysterious
> # 22 / # 8 - Worth of Water/ Easy By Nature
> # 54 / *32 - Natural Guide/ Virtue of Holiness
> #126 / #72 - Self-Love/ Holding Oneself Dear
> #189 / #63 - Origins in Reversal/ Consider Beginnings
> #265 / #76 - Strength's Warning Signs/ Revealers of Virtue
> #302 / #37 - Non-Deeming Action/ Administration of Government
> #321 / #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism/ Returning to Simplicity
> #351 / #30 - Government without Coercion/ Be Chary of War
>
> SUPER: #348
>
> # 14 / #14 - Metaphysical Issues/ Praising the Mysterious
> # 36 / #22 - Point to Reversal?/ Humility's Increase
> # 90 / *54 - Culturing Perspectives/ Cultivation of Intuition
> #135 / #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue
> #162 / #27 - Paradoxes of the Greatest Skill/ Function of Skill
> #184 / #22 - Point to Reversal?/ Humility's Increase
> #243 / #59 - A Sensible Guide/ Hold Fast To Reason
> #321 / #78 - Recognizing Fidelity/ Trust in Faith
> #348 / #27 - Paradoxes of the Greatest Skill/ Function of Skill
>
> Nous: #45 (E: #433, S: #294), Plane: 2
>
> Time: 08:45 hrs
> Date: 03 August, 2007
> Torah: #1 + #20 + #1 =3D #22
> Tao: #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue
> I-Ching: H49 - Revolution
> Mystery: #28 - Change
> EGO: #433
>
> # 45 / #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue
> # 90 / *45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue
> #170 / #80 - Primitivist Independence/ Remaining in Isolation
> #186 / #16 - Being a Guide/ Returning to the Root
> #242 / #56 - Abstruse Virtuosity/ Virtue of the Mysterious
> #314 / #72 - Self-Love/ Holding Oneself Dear
> #348 / #34 - Great Guide/ Trust in its Perfection
> #410 / #62 - Construing a Guide/ Practise Reason
> #433 / #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts/ Emptiness & Non-
> Existence
>
> SUPER: #294
>
> # 45 / #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue
> # 54 / * 9 - Inconstancy of Achievement/ Practising Placidity
> # 62 / # 8 - Worth of Water/ Easy By Nature
> # 86 / #24 - Im****tant Distinctions/ Trouble from Indulgence
> #166 / #80 - Primitivist Independence/ Remaining in Isolation
> #237 / #71 - Know-How as a Disease/ Disease of Knowledge
> #261 / #24 - Im****tant Distinctions/ Trouble from Indulgence
> #266 / # 5 - Natural Guidance/ Function of Emptiness
> #294 / #28 - Opposites and Primitivism/ Returning to Simplicity
>
> Is there any historical record as to the dates for when this meeting
> took place?
>
> - dolf
>
>
>
> dolf wrote:
> > 7 August 2007 [Super: #396 / #40 - Reversal/ Avoiding Activity; I-
> > Ching: H36 - Sinking Light; Tetra: #68 - Dimming; Ego: #275/ #40 -
> > Reversal/ Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 - Sinking Light; Tetra: #68
> > - Dimming]
>
> > "Thus he spoke, but an immeasurable fear seized the man, such a thing
> > did he fear. And then, having craftily devised all in turn, he
> > entreated the peoples and began to speak in words like these: 'Men
> > sated with faithlessness, smitten with a great madness, what you did
> > will not escape the notice of God, for he knows all things, the
> > immortal saviour, who oversees everything, who commanded me to
> > announce to you, so that you may not be destroyed by your hearts. Be
> > sober, cut off evils, and stop fighting violently with each other,
> > having a bloodthirsty heart, drenching much earth with human blood.
> > Mortals, stand in awe of the exceedingly great, fearless heavenly
> > creator, imperishable God, who inhabits the vault of heaven, and
> > entreat him, all of you--for he is good--for life, cities, and the
> > whole world... so that he will be gracious to all.
>
> > For the time will come when the whole immense world of men peri****ng
> > by waters will wail with a dread refrain. Suddenly you will find the
> > air in confusion and the wrath of the great God will come upon you
> > from heaven. It will truly come to pass that the immortal saviour will
> > cast forth upon men ... unless you propitiate God and repent as from
> > now, and no longer anyone do anything ill-tempered or evil, lawlessly
> > against one another but be guarded in holy life.'
>
> > When they heard him they sneered at him, each one, calling him
> > demented, a man gone mad." [Sibylline Oracles 1.147-172]
>
> > "Dolf would appear to be insane." [Heather Hornblower"
> > th...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0246 hours, Saturday 04 August 2007]
>
> > "In this case appearances are not deceptive." [Barry OGrady
> > god_free_jo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0156 hours, Monday 6 August 2007]
>
> > "But that we may describe the conception and the parturition of
> > virtues (Ego: #414 / #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement/ Practising
> > Placidity; I-Ching : H7 - Army; Mystery : #32 - Legion; Super: #361
> > (?) / #37 - Non-Deeming Action/ Administration of Government; I-
> > Ching : H40 - Deliverance; Mystery : #21 - Release) [#60, #72, #26,
> > #16 - Being a Guide/ Returning to the Root, #13 - Status/ Loathing
> > Shame, #45, #53, #54, #75],
>
> > Categories of the Understanding
> > #361
> > #300 #50 #10 #1 Hated
> > #40 #90 #400 #20 #1 #50 #300 #10 Men of thy contention (as contending
> > with thee)
> > #50 #300 #10 #1 A king; a head or chief (of a tribe or family); vapour
> > or cloud
>
> > #414
> > #1 #8 #400 #5 To fear
> > #5 #3 #6 #400 Meditation, thought
> > #5 #300 #100 #9 A resting, a keeping quiet
> > #7 #400 #6 #1 n. Irascible
> > #8 #6 #400 To be afraid, terrified; to surround, encircle
> > #10 #400 #4 To pierce, stick in; a peg, pin, nail; a small spade or
> > shovel; a prince
> > #50 #8 #300 #6 #50 n. Whisperer or Enchanter
>
> > Let the superstitious either stop their ears, or else let them depart;
> > for we are about to teach those initiated persons who are worthy of
> > the knowledge of the most sacred mysteries, the whole nature of such
> > divine and secret ordinances. And those who are thus worthy are they
> > who, with all modesty, practise genuine piety, of that sort which
> > scorns to disguise itself under any false colours. But we will not act
> > the part of hierophant or expounder of sacred mysteries to those who
> > are afflicted with the incurable disease of pride of language and
> > quibbling expressons, and juggling tricks of manners, and who measure
> > sanctity and holiness by no other standard.
>
> >http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/angels.html?nous=3D420
>
> > "But God distributes his good things, not like a seller vending his
> > wares at a high price, but he is inclined to make presents of
> > everything, pouring return; for he has no need of anything, nor is
> > there any created being competent to give him a suitable gift in
> > return." [Philo Judaeus of Alexandria's (20BCE-50CE) 'On Cherubim II'
> > - Divine Name or Angels of the Zodiac? =A9 Copyright 1993 Hendrickson
> > Publishers, Inc ISBN: 0-943575-93-1]
>
> > "For this cause I Paul {small; little}, the prisoner of Jesus {savior;
> > deliverer} Christ for you Gentiles, if ye have heard of the
> > dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: How
> > that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote
> > afore in few words, Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my
> > knowledge in the mystery of Christ) Which in other ages was not made
> > known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy
> > apostles and prophets by the Spirit; That the Gentiles should be
> > fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in
> > Christ by the gospel: Whereof I was made a minister, according to the
> > gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his
> > power." [Ephesians 3:1-7]
>
> > I have previously raised the hypothesis that during the Chinese Han
> > dynasty (206 BCE - 220 CE) and Wei-Chin period (220-420 CE) there was
> > both trade in exquisite comodities and philosophical dialog occuring
> > between China and the Western world--Yet there appears to be a
> > historical silence by individuals such as pre-eminate Hellenized
> > Jewish scholars including Philo of Alexandria (20 BCE-50CE) who had
> > access to the immense literary and technological records of the
> > Alexandrian library and his brother Gaius Julius Alexander the
> > Alabarch {a controller of customs}, who as the richest Jewish
> > individual of his time, doubtlessly profited from the im****tation of
> > goods. And furthermore, the exact reason for his imprisonment by the
> > enraged Roman Emperor, Caesar Gaius (Caligula) 37 - 41CE is unknown,
> > but may have been connected with Philo's subsequent diplomatic embassy
> > in 39/40 CE which he do***ented in detail.
>
> >http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/angels.html?nous=3D470
>
> > It is difficult to deny that the later Chinese philosopher Wang-Bi's
> > (226-249 CE) metaphysical commentaries on both the Book of Changes (I-
> > Ching) and Lao Tzu's Tao (the way) Te (of virtue) Ching (and
> > causality) as the articulation of original non-being which finds its
> > attainment in the One of 'long, long ago' (cf: Heb. Qedem yom yatsar
> > -- from the ancient times, that I have formed it [Isaiah 37:26]): "One
> > is the beginning of numbers and the ultimate number of things. Each
> > thing, as such, is produced by the one [Unity] and this is why it is
> > the master of them all [Multiplicity]" [#39 - Achieving Oneness/ The
> > Root of Order], actually finds its conception within the Jewish
> > metaphysical Kabbalistic literature known as the Sefer Yetzirah: "Ten
> > Sefirot of Nothingness {ie. the number of ten fingers, five opposite
> > five with a singular covenant [1:3]} Their end is imbedded in their
> > beginning and their beginning in their end like a flame in a burning
> > coal. For the Master is singular he has no second and before One, what
> > do you count?" [Sefer Yetzirah 1:7]
>
> > The Sefirot (Number) were a Kabbalistic philosophical conception of
> > Number that concerns a spiritual realm in which space does not exist.
> > In preceding the physical world, it conveys a domain or realm that is
> > above time, where past, present and future are one. Thus this
> > metaphysical reality beyond the realm of physical phenomena might be
> > considered the equivalent to the non-being (wu) as original substance
> > (pen-t'i) which characterised the development in thinking during the
> > Wei-Chin (220-420 CE) period.
>
> > Rabbi Jaakov Feldman, in his interpretations given of the 'Duties of
> > the Heart' raises an im****tant issue regarding claims to piety, which
> > is not unfamiliar to Christians--that is related to the tongue as the
> > organ of speech: "Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasts
> > great things. Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindles! And
> > the tongue is a fire, a world-KOSMOS of iniquity-ADIKIA: so is the
> > tongue among our members-MELOS {ie. this little-MIKROS member-MELOS
> > rather than the feeble-ASTHENES and uncomely-ASCHEMON parts as our
> > ***ual organs upon which we bestow superabundant-PERISSOTEROS honor-
> > TIME and decorum-EUCHEMOSUNE (nobility) is the cause of sin [1
> > Corinthians 12:12-31]}, that it defiles-SPILOO the whole body, and
> > sets-PHLOGIZO on fire the course-TROCHOS {ie. a wheel (as a runner),
> > that is, (figuratively) a circuit of physical effects:-course} of
> > nature-GENESIS; and it is set on fire by hell." [James 3:5-6]
>
> > He suggests that the tongue is perhaps one of the most unexpected
> > areas in which we're asked to practice appropriate abstention: "We're
> > told that we'd well to avoid speaking too much, for example. Since, as
> > Ibn Pakudah puts it, 'the tongue is quick to sin and its sins are the
> > most numerous sort of all.' After all, 'just try to remember what has
> > come out of your mouth in the course of a day' and you're sure to be
> > embarrassed!
>
> > "I understand where you are coming from. You are smart enough to see
> > the absurdity of Christianity but, perhaps through childhood
> > indoctrination, you are unable to let go of the security blanket, so
> > you make up things to satisfy your ego. The good bad thing is an
> > example of that. You see that there is no good God but you can't stand
> > the idea of a bad or no God so you invent a God that is neither good
> > nor bad." [Barry OGrady god_free_jo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0156 hours, Monday 6
> > August 2007]
>
> > We're then advised to temper our senses of sight and hearing, and to
> > 'not see what you do not need to, or look at things that distract you
> > from thinking about im****tant things'; and to avoid 'hearing what you
> > don't need to hear, and stop listening ... to needless, untrue,
> > rumorous, and gossipy conversation', as well as from listening to
> > 'things that lead you to rebel against G-d or neglect His
> > commandments'." [Copyright =A9 2005 Rabbi Yaakov Feldman Project
Genesis
> >http://www.torah.org,
The Duties of the Heart: Gate Nine: "The Gate of
> > Abstinence" Chapter 5 (Part 2)]
>
> > The New Testament era literature of [1 John 4:1-6] provides a simple
> > test by which one may distinguish between the 'spirit of truth' as
> > 'sons of light' and 'spirit of error' as 'sons of darkness'
> > perpetuated by false prophets. That those of the world-KOSMOS, speak
> > as of the world, and the world hears them, but it is those who keep
> > God's commandments and the faith of Jesus [1 John 3:24, Revelation
> > 14:12] who are of God: "By this you know the Spirit of God: Every
> > spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of
> > God, and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come
> > in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the anti-christ
> > (ie. the antithesis), which you have heard was coming, and is now
> > already in the world." [1 John 4:2-3]
>
> > As we'll see, this is not concerned with some glib pronouncement
> > proffered by many who claim to being Christians, as though it were a
> > magical incantation.
>
> > The explanation for this has a greater and more profound architectural
> > and hermetic philosophical consideration--That the anti-thesis to the
> > Christian affirmation finds its impetus within a philosophy-
> > PHILOSOPHIA {ie. hymeneal mysticism as sophistry} originating within
> > the 'rudiments-STOICHEION of the world-KOSMOS' as vain-KENOS deceit-
> > APATE perpetuating a tradition-PARADOSIS {ie. 'servitude-DOULOU to
> > that which is by nature-PHUSIS {germination or expansion, natural
> > reproduction}}.
>
> > If marriage means "the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of
> > all others, voluntarily entered into for life"
>
> > How is such marriage described within the Australian vernacular as
> > '****ing oath' {ie. truth} distinguished from being associated to any
> > particular religious belief?
>
> > If marriage is defined as "the co-spousal union of two persons as
> > husband or wife or defacto spouse or consort, to the exclusion of all
> > others, voluntarily entered into for life", how then does this affect
> > the natural law and common law rights of Australian Aboriginals and
> > Torres Strait Islanders?
>
> > The consideration advanced by the Sefer Yetzirah in relation to the
> > 'Master is singular, He has no second (ie. dyad)' in that 'God
> > faithful King dominates over them from His holy dwelling until
> > eternity of eternities' [Yetzirah 1:5] rests in an HETEROS
> > understanding of the Pythagorean (c. 580-500 BCE) conception of Number
> > (as a universal and divine HOMOIOTIC principle which is quite
> > different to the predominately quantitative understanding of it
> > applied today.
>
> > The Pythagorean philosophical belief of Number conveys it as having an
> > association with the root of nature {A-U-M} or Tetractys, as 'Holy
> > Four-fold Form, as the 'principle and source or root of all things'.
> > And this Tetragrammic attribution is readily obtained by the summing
> > of each row of the Chinese philosopher Yang Hsiung's (53 BCE - 18 CE)
> > Tetragrammatic glyphs, thereby deliminating it into one of 4 x 18
> > segment quadrants: {1-18, 19-36, 37-54, 55-72}. But more explicitly,
> > according to this assumption, the One {ie. Unity as Yang and Limited,
> > Extemity and Impossity} as Matter or the Duad {ie. Dyad as Yin and
> > Unlimited, Apeiron and Possibility} as its Form were not regarded as
> > the 1st and 2nd number, but the essential principle underlying the
> > conception of Number, which is to say that each number--especially the
> > first ten (ie. 10 Sefirot)--may schematically be seen as
> > manifestations of diversity within a unified continuum. [Copyright =A9
> > 1988 Guthrie & Fideler, 'Pythagorean Sourcebook & Library', p 21]
>
> > According to the Hasidic Jewish Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan, it is related to
> > the circular the analogy as equivalent to the hexagonal trigrams or
> > 'cause and effect' sphere of the Yin and Yang {ie: Yang =3D male as
> > active principle, positive attribute; light; cause; Yin(g) =3D female
as
> > passive principle, negative attribute; dark; to fill; correspondence}.
> > Where the 'beginning' is the Keter (crown) as cause, while the 'end'
> > is Malkhut (dwelling of God within creation) as effect---that within
> > Christ "dwells all-PAS the fulness-PLEROMA of the Godhead-THEOTES
> > bodily-SOMATIKOS {ie. cor****eally, or physically as the forma
> > cor****is}. And you are complete in him, which is the head-KEPHALE of
> > all principality-ARCHE and power-EXOUSIA." [Colossians 2:8-10]
>
> > The Hebrew Torah Scholar, Greek Philosopher and Christian Apostle Paul
> > has in mind, that the death of Christ on the Cross brings about a
> > spoiling-apekduomai of the pagan Priesthoods aligned with Roman State
> > Religion as 'rulers-kosmokrater of the obscurity-skotos of this age-
> > aion' who engaged in 'spiritual-pneumatikos wickedness-****eia' when
> > he speaks of 'principalities-arche and powers-exousia, he made-
> > deigmatizo a show-deigmatizo of them openly-en-parrhesia, triumphing-
> > thriambeuo'. [Colossians 2:15]
>
> > This is further emphasized by his elsewhere raising a particular
> > concern over the great sin of the bible. He is here using language
> > 'principalities-arche' and 'powers-exousia' normally associated with a
> > particular nomenclature as Kabbalistic celestial hierarchy of
> > governance by which it occurs-The advocacy of equitable governance
> > {homoios} as conveyed by the definition given by the Greek word hodos
> > or the Hebrew word derek (German for Ruler) is a systematic approach
> > to governance and autonomous {ie. autos / one's true self, the soul +
> > nomos / Torah; containing its own principles of self-governance}
> > rights being representative of Hebrew/Greek Judaeo-Christian belief,
> > which stands in contrast to the denial of it as claimed religious
> > belief.
>
> > As my own Judaeo-Christian (I am at home in Hassidic Jewish Wisdom,
> > Judaism atwww.Torah.org, Dead Sea Scrolls and New Testament
> > Christianity) religious belief is conveyed by a chronological
> > interpretation of the natural and common law paradigm conveyed by the
> > GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is an issue of transcendence that is at
> > once concerned with an 'a priori' teleological argument of intelligent
> > design associated with an Anthropic Principle, I ought in the
> > cir***stance be free from hymeneal antagonism of HETEROS as
> > philosophical HETERONOMY and religious MYSTICISM through being subject
> > to a law or standard external to itself as AUTONOMY; In Kantian moral
> > philosophy, acting in accordance with one's desires rather than reason
> > or moral duty; subject to different laws.
>
> > NATURAL AND COMMON LAW COSMOLOGICAL PARADIGM AT HEART OF JIHADIST
> > TERRORISM
>
> > Journalist Chris Merritt, makes the following comment in the 03 August
> > 2007 edition of the Australian newspaper: "FOR an exceedingly bright
> > fellow, Michael Kirby does a great impression of someone who has
> > closed his eyes to the changed world in which we live.
>
> > Sadly, he is not alone. Bright people all across the nation have been
> > unable to wrap their minds around the nature of the terrorist threat.
>
> > Until they do, the national response to the rise of Islamic fascism
> > will be hobbled...
>
> > The current threat is unorthodox. It does not fit neatly into the way
> > in which countries governed by the common law respond to crime. But
> > the genius of the common law is that it adapts to changing
> > cir***stances. That is why it has survived." [Chris Merritt, 'Time
> > Changes, But Kirby Doesn't', The Australian Newspaper 3 August 2007, p
> > 1 (Ego: #433 / #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue; I-Ching:
> > H49 - Revolution; Tetra: #28 - Change; Super: #294 / #9 - Inconstancy
> > of Achievement/ Practising Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - Army; Tetra: #32 -
> > Legion)]
>
> > The views expressed by Chris Merrit raise a conceptual issue
> > concerning 'nominalism' and 'realism' in that the current threat posed
> > by Terrorism is an orthodox desire for Sharia Law as a Natural and
> > Common Law issue.
>
> > Part of the problem with this is the lack of a common cosmological
> > perspective which provides a shared paradigm of mind associated with
> > Number and Taxonomy. That Australia's discovery and claim as a British
> > possession is really the product of improvements within cosmology
> > which saw the adoption of the norm 365.2425 days for the topical year.
>
> > However given the Biblical Cosmology associated to the ephemeral and
> > mundane activity of the Torah priests commences its 364 days base 7
> > cycle on a Wednesday 20 March Equinox and that the Saturday 23
> > September Equinox following 5 x 364 + 182 days is the means for
> > determining when the 'OTH or apogee of this cycle of the Bible's
> > Sabbath based Everlasting Covenant occurs.
>
> > That the computational norm of this 'OTH cycle when it reaches 6J as
> > 294 x 364 is able to obtain the same computational norm: 293 years x
> > 365.2425 as that which was later adopted by the Gregorian calendar
> > reforms of 1582 CE and Great Britain in 1752 CE.
>
> > If we further divide the number of days in 400 years x 365.2425 =3D
> > 146097 by 22 given as our Sabbath based computational norm, we are
> > able to see how this tem****al understanding of time, relates to the
> > infinite in that 6000 years % 22 gives a remainder of #13 days.
>
> > This is consistent with the view concerning the historical calendar
> > usage of Magic Square 9(9=B2+1)/2 =3D #369 which always gives #41 on
13=
th
> > to 17th September and that the 18th September 2001 commences the new
> > moon.
>
> > That this represents the "genius of the common law that adapts to
> > changing cir***stances" and because of this, the rise of Islamic
> > fascism will be hobbled.
>
> >http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/chronicles/images/nous.gif
>
> > That the exquisite beauty of the Australian Constitution lies in the
> > reality that it can be sustained by a Natural Law and Common Law
> > mathematical model--the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON--it is both
> > infallible and beyond reproach.
>
> > To undertand why this is im****tant I reproduce Ehsan Ahrari's comments
> > in the Asia Times of 22 July 2003, in an article titled: "Enemies from
> > within: Iran and Saudi Arabia", whereby he describes the paradox
> > inherent to the Chaldean {a Magian or professional astrologer}
> > Literary-shepher {properly writing (the art or a do***ent); by
> > implication a book:-bill, book, evidence, learning, letter, register,
> > scroll} Art-lashon {the tongue (of man or animals), used literally (as
> > the instrument of licking, eating, or speech), and figuratively
> > (speech, an ingot, a fork of flame, a cove of water):- babbler, bay,
> > evil speaker, language, talker, tongue, wedge} [Daniel 1:4]
>
> > "First, they created a constitution which established the Vilayat-e-
> > Faqih (rule of the clergy). As such, it made the head clergy (the
> > Supreme Leader) both infallible and beyond reproach. The concept of
> > infallibility is essentially an anti-Islamic concept, since from
> > theological perspectives no one is infallible, save God. At the same
> > time, the notion of the Vilayat-e-Faqih sowed the seeds for the
> > establishment of a theological dictator****p, which was going to be as
> > exclusionist of the common people as the monarchy that it replaced.
>
> > The constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran is fundamentally
anti-
> > democratic in the sense that it allocates too much power to the
> > Supreme Leader and his handpicked cronies. Only a cursory review of
> > the Iranian constitution makes it clear that it has created an
> > absolute dictator****p of the Supreme Leader. The Iranian parliament is
> > held in check by the Council of Guardians, a body that has power to
> > "examine all laws passed by the parliament to determine their
> > compatibility with [the] Sharia or Islamic law". The Supreme Leader
> > appoints half of the members of this council, and the second half are
> > recommended by the head of the judiciary and confirmed by parliament.
>
> > The radically conservative nature of the council may be underscored by
> > the fact that it has been known to strike down up to 40 percent of the
> > laws passed by the government."
>
> > The current threat posed by Terrorism is obstensibly a Natural and
> > Common Law issue associated with cosmology and the conceptual
> > theological and metaphysical issues involved with the use of force
> > (#237) associated with an Autonomous Sovereign entity...
>
> > In Jihad Jack's cir***stance as determination made by the High Court
> > of Australia, all that is necessary is to measure his conduct on given
> > days and times when he is to re****t to the police--given the GRAPPLE
> > HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is the paradigm to which tem****al (time / date)
> > events as phenomenon may be associated and by which speech may be
> > evaluated, all that the control order needs to do is take a video
> > journal of the times he re****ts to police and record his response to
> > innocuous questions.
>
> > If the individual functions in accordance with the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC
> > NOUMENON, there is simply no need for the Control Order as the
> > individual's behaviour is in accordance with common law principles--
> > that the war on terror requires no other exceptional response.
>
> > That the teleological basis for religious belief applies equally to
> > the understanding of the Kosmos as a s****ts paradigm of mind.
>
> > The perspective of 122J3W1D as being equivalent to 6,000 topical years
> > of 365.2425 days and the Sabbath Year arises from the observation that
> > the Equinox on DATE(1996,3,20)+(5*364)+182 =3D 12 September 2001 is
the
> > 1st day of the 7th solar month and that the 22nd Priestly Course
> > following as Gamul {a recompense} within this 6th Year was the subject
> > of considerable appraisal in which the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur)
> > occurred and conjecture as reprise of the Torah 364 day Genesis
> > Cosmogony: "Cosmologists have concocted a way for an endless stream of
> > big bangs to occur spontaneously throughout space and time, each
> > triggering the birth of a 'bubble' universe somewhere and somewhen in
> > the boundless multiverse, with each bubble governed internally by its
> > very own by-laws.
>
> > However, their calculations appeal to quantum mechanics, relativity
> > and a host of other conventional oddments from the standard tool kit
> > of theoretical physics. Accepting such meta-laws as given--true
> > without reason or explanation--merely ****fts the mystery of the laws
> > of physics in our universe up a level, to that of the meta-laws in the
> > multiverse.
>
> > The basic difficulty can be traced back to the traditional concept of
> > a physical law. Since at least the time of Isaac Newton, the laws of
> > physics have been treated as immutable, universal, eternal
> > relation****ps--infinitely precise mathematical rules that transcend
> > the physical universe and inhabit an abstract other-worldly realm.
>
> > These perfect rules were supposedly imprinted on the universe--
> > somehow--from outside, at the moment of cosmic creation, and haven't
> > changed an iota since. In particular, the laws care nothing for what
> > is actually happening in the universe, however violent the physical
> > processes may be. So the universe depends on the laws, but the laws
> > are strangely independent of the universe.
>
> > Four hundred years on, physicists still cling to this model of
> > physical law, even though they have no idea what the external source
> > of the laws might be. So long as science appeals to something outside
> > the universe, we must abandon any hope of ultimately understanding why
> > the universe is as it is. A large element of mystery will lie forever
> > beyond our reach.
>
> > There is, however, another possibility: relinquish the notion of
> > immutable, transcendent laws and try to explain the observed behavior
> > entirely in terms of processes occurring within the universe. As it
> > happens, there is a growing minority of scientists whose concept of
> > physical law departs radically from the orthodox view and whose ideas
> > offer an ideal model for developing this picture." [Physicist Paul
> > Davies, How the Universe Got Its Laws -- and our surprising role in
> > shaping them, New Scientist -- New Ideas Innovation issue 30 June
> > 2007, p 30]
>
> > Telos [122J3W1D] =3D Arch [3W1D] + c=B2 [9(9=B2+1)/2]
> > The 364 day Jubilee chronological equivalent to 122J3W1D as 6,000
> > topical years of 365.2425 days is 6020 years of 364 days + 175 days
> > and which has proximity to the DATE(1996,3,20)+175 =3D 11 September
1996
>
> > 1st Year - 'oth cycle of 1092 days / +3W1D
> > 20-Mar-1996 as 22nd =3D Gamul
> > 19-Jun-1996 as 11th =3D Elia****b
> > 18-Sep-1996 as 24th =3D Maaziah
> > 18-Dec-1996 as 13th =3D Huppah
>
> > 2nd Year / +3W2D
> > 19-Mar-1997 as 2nd =3D Jedaiah
> > 18-Jun-1997 as 15th =3D Bilgah
> > 17-Sep-1997 as 4th =3D Seorim
> > 17-Dec-1997 as 17th =3D Hezir
>
> > 3rd Year / +3W3D
> > 18-Mar-1998 as 6th =3D Mijamin
> > 17-Jun-1998 as 19th =3D Pethahiah
> > 16-Sep-1998 as 8th =3D Abijah
> > 16-Dec-1998 as 21st =3D Jachin
>
> > 4th Year - 'oth cycle of 1092 days / +3W4D
> > 17-Mar-1999 as 10th =3D Shecaniah
> > 16-Jun-1999 as 23rd =3D Delaiah
> > 15-Sep-1999 as 12th =3D Jakim
> > 15-Dec-1999 as 1st =3D Jehoiarib
>
> > 5th Year / +3W5D
> > 15-Mar-2000 as 14th =3D Jeshebeab
> > 14-Jun-2000 as 3rd =3D Harim
> > 13-Sep-2000 as 16th =3D Immer
> > 13-Dec-2000 as 5th =3D Malchijah
>
> > 6th Year / +3W6D
>
> > 14-Mar-2001 as 18th =3D Happizzez
> > 13-Jun-2001 as 7th =3D Hakkoz
> > 12-Sep-2001 as 20th =3D Jehezekel
>
> > =3DDATE(1996,3,20)+(5*364)+182 =3D 12 September 2001 as 22nd Gamul
23-29
> > Sept 2001 (Begins Sabbath year)
>
> > 12-Dec-2001 as 9th =3D Jeshua
>
> > Given this teleological premise, a S****TS ARENA's adoption, deployment
> > and representation of geometric principles isn't just compliant with
> > the cosmological laws associated with SPACE (1 - FOCUS/X; 2 - EQUITY/
> > Y; 3 - RATIO/Z) but also to TIME. Within this context the GRAPPLE
> > HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON, might in the future be deployed to provide the
> > architectural basis for interactive s****ts involving:
>
> > a) Entity managed Avatars
> > b) Autonomous Avatars
> > c) Probability functions as what-if against human action
> > d) Eternity upon which tem****al human biopsychological function occurs
>
> > That this conveys a common cosmological perspective which provides a
> > shared paradigm of mind associated with Number and Taxonomy--that if
> > s****ting fraternities adopt the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON as the
> > basis for hosting its semantical world as belief system, that this, in
> > its deployment of theological and metaphysical principles will
> > continue to place preassures on religious life.
>
> > In so doing s****ts technology will continue to assimilate theological
> > and metaphysical principles associated with virtue and ethics which
> > religious life has heretofore been incapable of embracing: "The
> > burgeoning field of computer science has ****fted our view of the
> > physical world from that of a collection of interacting material
> > particles to one of a seething network of information. In this way of
> > looking at nature, the laws of physics are a form of software, or
> > algorithm, while the material world--the hardware--plays the role of a
> > gigantic computer." [Physicist Paul Davies, How the Universe Got Its
> > Laws -- and our surprising role in shaping them, New Scientist -- New
> > Ideas Innovation issue 30 June 2007, p 30]
>
> > - dolf
> >http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/Chronicles/ICreate.html-
Hide
qu=
oted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
