My dear Jewish friends,
I was poking about Philo of Alexandria's writings which I have long
suspected that there is a Kabbalistic encyclical architecture which
underpins his works.
For example: "...teach those initiated persons who are worthy of the
knowledge of the most sacred mysteries, the whole nature of such
divine and secret ordinances."
There appears to have been a savage contention as hatred between the
Judaeo-Christian Apostle Paul and other Jewish Hellenists and in
exploring this I stumbled across the Gematric value #348 as a possible
theme to Philo's writing regarding: On Virtues and Cherubim.
http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/kangarujack/interrogator/jack.html?=
Telos=3D348
The hypothesis I'd like to advance is that #348 which has tem****al
relation****ps to the dates:
3 August
9 August
10 August
might be the theological basis and mechanism for his Embassy to
Emperor Caligula and in so doing having sold out the Judaism to Roman
governance:
Nous: #42 (E: #348, S: #382), Plane: 4
Time: 09:15 hrs
Date: 10 August, 2007
Torah: #300 + #1 + #5 =3D #306
Tao: #42 - Generating Things/ Reason's Modifications
I-Ching: H60 - Restraint
Mystery: #52 - Measure
EGO: #348
# 40 / #40 - Reversal/ Avoiding Activity
# 80 / #40 - Reversal/ Avoiding Activity
#142 / #62 - Construing a Guide/ Practise Reason
#184 / *42 - Generating Things/ Reason's Modifications
#218 / #34 - Great Guide/ Trust in its Perfection
#228 / #10 - Impossible Advice/ What can Be Done?
#273 / #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue
#327 / #54 - Culturing Perspectives/ Cultivation of Intuition
#348 / #21 - Guiding and the Physical/ Emptying the Heart
SUPER: #382
# 40 / #40 - Reversal/ Avoiding Activity
#120 / #80 - Primitivist Independence/ Remaining in Isolation
#181 / #61 - Virtuosity at Using 'Beneath'/ Virtue of Humility
#203 / *22 - Point to Reversal?/ Humility's Increase
#259 / #56 - Abstruse Virtuosity/ Virtue of the Mysterious
#325 / #66 - Strategic Reversal/ Putting Oneself Behind
#355 / #30 - Government without Coercion/ Be Chary of War
#358 / # 3 - Prescriptions for Politics/ Keeping the People Quiet
#382 / #24 - Im****tant Distinctions/ Trouble from Indulgence
Nous: #32 (E: #351, S: #348), Plane: 3
Time: 09:10 hrs
Date: 09 August, 2007
Torah: #80 + #5 + #30 =3D #115
Tao: #32 - Natural Guide/ Virtue of Holiness
I-Ching: H44 - Coming On
Mystery: #43 - Encounters
EGO: #351
# 14 / #14 - Metaphysical Issues/ Praising the Mysterious
# 22 / # 8 - Worth of Water/ Easy By Nature
# 54 / *32 - Natural Guide/ Virtue of Holiness
#126 / #72 - Self-Love/ Holding Oneself Dear
#189 / #63 - Origins in Reversal/ Consider Beginnings
#265 / #76 - Strength's Warning Signs/ Revealers of Virtue
#302 / #37 - Non-Deeming Action/ Administration of Government
#321 / #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism/ Returning to Simplicity
#351 / #30 - Government without Coercion/ Be Chary of War
SUPER: #348
# 14 / #14 - Metaphysical Issues/ Praising the Mysterious
# 36 / #22 - Point to Reversal?/ Humility's Increase
# 90 / *54 - Culturing Perspectives/ Cultivation of Intuition
#135 / #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue
#162 / #27 - Paradoxes of the Greatest Skill/ Function of Skill
#184 / #22 - Point to Reversal?/ Humility's Increase
#243 / #59 - A Sensible Guide/ Hold Fast To Reason
#321 / #78 - Recognizing Fidelity/ Trust in Faith
#348 / #27 - Paradoxes of the Greatest Skill/ Function of Skill
Nous: #45 (E: #433, S: #294), Plane: 2
Time: 08:45 hrs
Date: 03 August, 2007
Torah: #1 + #20 + #1 =3D #22
Tao: #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue
I-Ching: H49 - Revolution
Mystery: #28 - Change
EGO: #433
# 45 / #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue
# 90 / *45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue
#170 / #80 - Primitivist Independence/ Remaining in Isolation
#186 / #16 - Being a Guide/ Returning to the Root
#242 / #56 - Abstruse Virtuosity/ Virtue of the Mysterious
#314 / #72 - Self-Love/ Holding Oneself Dear
#348 / #34 - Great Guide/ Trust in its Perfection
#410 / #62 - Construing a Guide/ Practise Reason
#433 / #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts/ Emptiness & Non-
Existence
SUPER: #294
# 45 / #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue
# 54 / * 9 - Inconstancy of Achievement/ Practising Placidity
# 62 / # 8 - Worth of Water/ Easy By Nature
# 86 / #24 - Im****tant Distinctions/ Trouble from Indulgence
#166 / #80 - Primitivist Independence/ Remaining in Isolation
#237 / #71 - Know-How as a Disease/ Disease of Knowledge
#261 / #24 - Im****tant Distinctions/ Trouble from Indulgence
#266 / # 5 - Natural Guidance/ Function of Emptiness
#294 / #28 - Opposites and Primitivism/ Returning to Simplicity
Is there any historical record as to the dates for when this meeting
took place?
- dolf
dolf wrote:
> 7 August 2007 [Super: #396 / #40 - Reversal/ Avoiding Activity; I-
> Ching: H36 - Sinking Light; Tetra: #68 - Dimming; Ego: #275/ #40 -
> Reversal/ Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 - Sinking Light; Tetra: #68
> - Dimming]
>
> "Thus he spoke, but an immeasurable fear seized the man, such a thing
> did he fear. And then, having craftily devised all in turn, he
> entreated the peoples and began to speak in words like these: 'Men
> sated with faithlessness, smitten with a great madness, what you did
> will not escape the notice of God, for he knows all things, the
> immortal saviour, who oversees everything, who commanded me to
> announce to you, so that you may not be destroyed by your hearts. Be
> sober, cut off evils, and stop fighting violently with each other,
> having a bloodthirsty heart, drenching much earth with human blood.
> Mortals, stand in awe of the exceedingly great, fearless heavenly
> creator, imperishable God, who inhabits the vault of heaven, and
> entreat him, all of you--for he is good--for life, cities, and the
> whole world... so that he will be gracious to all.
>
> For the time will come when the whole immense world of men peri****ng
> by waters will wail with a dread refrain. Suddenly you will find the
> air in confusion and the wrath of the great God will come upon you
> from heaven. It will truly come to pass that the immortal saviour will
> cast forth upon men ... unless you propitiate God and repent as from
> now, and no longer anyone do anything ill-tempered or evil, lawlessly
> against one another but be guarded in holy life.'
>
> When they heard him they sneered at him, each one, calling him
> demented, a man gone mad." [Sibylline Oracles 1.147-172]
>
> "Dolf would appear to be insane." [Heather Hornblower"
> there@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0246 hours, Saturday 04 August 2007]
>
> "In this case appearances are not deceptive." [Barry OGrady
> god_free_jones@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0156 hours, Monday 6 August 2007]
>
> "But that we may describe the conception and the parturition of
> virtues (Ego: #414 / #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement/ Practising
> Placidity; I-Ching : H7 - Army; Mystery : #32 - Legion; Super: #361
> (?) / #37 - Non-Deeming Action/ Administration of Government; I-
> Ching : H40 - Deliverance; Mystery : #21 - Release) [#60, #72, #26,
> #16 - Being a Guide/ Returning to the Root, #13 - Status/ Loathing
> Shame, #45, #53, #54, #75],
>
> Categories of the Understanding
> #361
> #300 #50 #10 #1 Hated
> #40 #90 #400 #20 #1 #50 #300 #10 Men of thy contention (as contending
> with thee)
> #50 #300 #10 #1 A king; a head or chief (of a tribe or family); vapour
> or cloud
>
> #414
> #1 #8 #400 #5 To fear
> #5 #3 #6 #400 Meditation, thought
> #5 #300 #100 #9 A resting, a keeping quiet
> #7 #400 #6 #1 n. Irascible
> #8 #6 #400 To be afraid, terrified; to surround, encircle
> #10 #400 #4 To pierce, stick in; a peg, pin, nail; a small spade or
> shovel; a prince
> #50 #8 #300 #6 #50 n. Whisperer or Enchanter
>
> Let the superstitious either stop their ears, or else let them depart;
> for we are about to teach those initiated persons who are worthy of
> the knowledge of the most sacred mysteries, the whole nature of such
> divine and secret ordinances. And those who are thus worthy are they
> who, with all modesty, practise genuine piety, of that sort which
> scorns to disguise itself under any false colours. But we will not act
> the part of hierophant or expounder of sacred mysteries to those who
> are afflicted with the incurable disease of pride of language and
> quibbling expressons, and juggling tricks of manners, and who measure
> sanctity and holiness by no other standard.
>
> http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/angels.html?nous=3D420
>
> "But God distributes his good things, not like a seller vending his
> wares at a high price, but he is inclined to make presents of
> everything, pouring return; for he has no need of anything, nor is
> there any created being competent to give him a suitable gift in
> return." [Philo Judaeus of Alexandria's (20BCE-50CE) 'On Cherubim II'
> - Divine Name or Angels of the Zodiac? =A9 Copyright 1993 Hendrickson
> Publishers, Inc ISBN: 0-943575-93-1]
>
> "For this cause I Paul {small; little}, the prisoner of Jesus {savior;
> deliverer} Christ for you Gentiles, if ye have heard of the
> dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: How
> that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote
> afore in few words, Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my
> knowledge in the mystery of Christ) Which in other ages was not made
> known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy
> apostles and prophets by the Spirit; That the Gentiles should be
> fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in
> Christ by the gospel: Whereof I was made a minister, according to the
> gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his
> power." [Ephesians 3:1-7]
>
> I have previously raised the hypothesis that during the Chinese Han
> dynasty (206 BCE - 220 CE) and Wei-Chin period (220-420 CE) there was
> both trade in exquisite comodities and philosophical dialog occuring
> between China and the Western world--Yet there appears to be a
> historical silence by individuals such as pre-eminate Hellenized
> Jewish scholars including Philo of Alexandria (20 BCE-50CE) who had
> access to the immense literary and technological records of the
> Alexandrian library and his brother Gaius Julius Alexander the
> Alabarch {a controller of customs}, who as the richest Jewish
> individual of his time, doubtlessly profited from the im****tation of
> goods. And furthermore, the exact reason for his imprisonment by the
> enraged Roman Emperor, Caesar Gaius (Caligula) 37 - 41CE is unknown,
> but may have been connected with Philo's subsequent diplomatic embassy
> in 39/40 CE which he do***ented in detail.
>
> http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/angels.html?nous=3D470
>
> It is difficult to deny that the later Chinese philosopher Wang-Bi's
> (226-249 CE) metaphysical commentaries on both the Book of Changes (I-
> Ching) and Lao Tzu's Tao (the way) Te (of virtue) Ching (and
> causality) as the articulation of original non-being which finds its
> attainment in the One of 'long, long ago' (cf: Heb. Qedem yom yatsar
> -- from the ancient times, that I have formed it [Isaiah 37:26]): "One
> is the beginning of numbers and the ultimate number of things. Each
> thing, as such, is produced by the one [Unity] and this is why it is
> the master of them all [Multiplicity]" [#39 - Achieving Oneness/ The
> Root of Order], actually finds its conception within the Jewish
> metaphysical Kabbalistic literature known as the Sefer Yetzirah: "Ten
> Sefirot of Nothingness {ie. the number of ten fingers, five opposite
> five with a singular covenant [1:3]} Their end is imbedded in their
> beginning and their beginning in their end like a flame in a burning
> coal. For the Master is singular he has no second and before One, what
> do you count?" [Sefer Yetzirah 1:7]
>
> The Sefirot (Number) were a Kabbalistic philosophical conception of
> Number that concerns a spiritual realm in which space does not exist.
> In preceding the physical world, it conveys a domain or realm that is
> above time, where past, present and future are one. Thus this
> metaphysical reality beyond the realm of physical phenomena might be
> considered the equivalent to the non-being (wu) as original substance
> (pen-t'i) which characterised the development in thinking during the
> Wei-Chin (220-420 CE) period.
>
> Rabbi Jaakov Feldman, in his interpretations given of the 'Duties of
> the Heart' raises an im****tant issue regarding claims to piety, which
> is not unfamiliar to Christians--that is related to the tongue as the
> organ of speech: "Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasts
> great things. Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindles! And
> the tongue is a fire, a world-KOSMOS of iniquity-ADIKIA: so is the
> tongue among our members-MELOS {ie. this little-MIKROS member-MELOS
> rather than the feeble-ASTHENES and uncomely-ASCHEMON parts as our
> ***ual organs upon which we bestow superabundant-PERISSOTEROS honor-
> TIME and decorum-EUCHEMOSUNE (nobility) is the cause of sin [1
> Corinthians 12:12-31]}, that it defiles-SPILOO the whole body, and
> sets-PHLOGIZO on fire the course-TROCHOS {ie. a wheel (as a runner),
> that is, (figuratively) a circuit of physical effects:-course} of
> nature-GENESIS; and it is set on fire by hell." [James 3:5-6]
>
> He suggests that the tongue is perhaps one of the most unexpected
> areas in which we're asked to practice appropriate abstention: "We're
> told that we'd well to avoid speaking too much, for example. Since, as
> Ibn Pakudah puts it, 'the tongue is quick to sin and its sins are the
> most numerous sort of all.' After all, 'just try to remember what has
> come out of your mouth in the course of a day' and you're sure to be
> embarrassed!
>
> "I understand where you are coming from. You are smart enough to see
> the absurdity of Christianity but, perhaps through childhood
> indoctrination, you are unable to let go of the security blanket, so
> you make up things to satisfy your ego. The good bad thing is an
> example of that. You see that there is no good God but you can't stand
> the idea of a bad or no God so you invent a God that is neither good
> nor bad." [Barry OGrady god_free_jones@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0156 hours, Monday 6
> August 2007]
>
> We're then advised to temper our senses of sight and hearing, and to
> 'not see what you do not need to, or look at things that distract you
> from thinking about im****tant things'; and to avoid 'hearing what you
> don't need to hear, and stop listening ... to needless, untrue,
> rumorous, and gossipy conversation', as well as from listening to
> 'things that lead you to rebel against G-d or neglect His
> commandments'." [Copyright =A9 2005 Rabbi Yaakov Feldman Project Genesis
> http://www.torah.org,
The Duties of the Heart: Gate Nine: "The Gate of
> Abstinence" Chapter 5 (Part 2)]
>
> The New Testament era literature of [1 John 4:1-6] provides a simple
> test by which one may distinguish between the 'spirit of truth' as
> 'sons of light' and 'spirit of error' as 'sons of darkness'
> perpetuated by false prophets. That those of the world-KOSMOS, speak
> as of the world, and the world hears them, but it is those who keep
> God's commandments and the faith of Jesus [1 John 3:24, Revelation
> 14:12] who are of God: "By this you know the Spirit of God: Every
> spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of
> God, and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come
> in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the anti-christ
> (ie. the antithesis), which you have heard was coming, and is now
> already in the world." [1 John 4:2-3]
>
> As we'll see, this is not concerned with some glib pronouncement
> proffered by many who claim to being Christians, as though it were a
> magical incantation.
>
> The explanation for this has a greater and more profound architectural
> and hermetic philosophical consideration--That the anti-thesis to the
> Christian affirmation finds its impetus within a philosophy-
> PHILOSOPHIA {ie. hymeneal mysticism as sophistry} originating within
> the 'rudiments-STOICHEION of the world-KOSMOS' as vain-KENOS deceit-
> APATE perpetuating a tradition-PARADOSIS {ie. 'servitude-DOULOU to
> that which is by nature-PHUSIS {germination or expansion, natural
> reproduction}}.
>
> If marriage means "the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of
> all others, voluntarily entered into for life"
>
> How is such marriage described within the Australian vernacular as
> '****ing oath' {ie. truth} distinguished from being associated to any
> particular religious belief?
>
> If marriage is defined as "the co-spousal union of two persons as
> husband or wife or defacto spouse or consort, to the exclusion of all
> others, voluntarily entered into for life", how then does this affect
> the natural law and common law rights of Australian Aboriginals and
> Torres Strait Islanders?
>
> The consideration advanced by the Sefer Yetzirah in relation to the
> 'Master is singular, He has no second (ie. dyad)' in that 'God
> faithful King dominates over them from His holy dwelling until
> eternity of eternities' [Yetzirah 1:5] rests in an HETEROS
> understanding of the Pythagorean (c. 580-500 BCE) conception of Number
> (as a universal and divine HOMOIOTIC principle which is quite
> different to the predominately quantitative understanding of it
> applied today.
>
> The Pythagorean philosophical belief of Number conveys it as having an
> association with the root of nature {A-U-M} or Tetractys, as 'Holy
> Four-fold Form, as the 'principle and source or root of all things'.
> And this Tetragrammic attribution is readily obtained by the summing
> of each row of the Chinese philosopher Yang Hsiung's (53 BCE - 18 CE)
> Tetragrammatic glyphs, thereby deliminating it into one of 4 x 18
> segment quadrants: {1-18, 19-36, 37-54, 55-72}. But more explicitly,
> according to this assumption, the One {ie. Unity as Yang and Limited,
> Extemity and Impossity} as Matter or the Duad {ie. Dyad as Yin and
> Unlimited, Apeiron and Possibility} as its Form were not regarded as
> the 1st and 2nd number, but the essential principle underlying the
> conception of Number, which is to say that each number--especially the
> first ten (ie. 10 Sefirot)--may schematically be seen as
> manifestations of diversity within a unified continuum. [Copyright =A9
> 1988 Guthrie & Fideler, 'Pythagorean Sourcebook & Library', p 21]
>
> According to the Hasidic Jewish Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan, it is related to
> the circular the analogy as equivalent to the hexagonal trigrams or
> 'cause and effect' sphere of the Yin and Yang {ie: Yang =3D male as
> active principle, positive attribute; light; cause; Yin(g) =3D female as
> passive principle, negative attribute; dark; to fill; correspondence}.
> Where the 'beginning' is the Keter (crown) as cause, while the 'end'
> is Malkhut (dwelling of God within creation) as effect---that within
> Christ "dwells all-PAS the fulness-PLEROMA of the Godhead-THEOTES
> bodily-SOMATIKOS {ie. cor****eally, or physically as the forma
> cor****is}. And you are complete in him, which is the head-KEPHALE of
> all principality-ARCHE and power-EXOUSIA." [Colossians 2:8-10]
>
> The Hebrew Torah Scholar, Greek Philosopher and Christian Apostle Paul
> has in mind, that the death of Christ on the Cross brings about a
> spoiling-apekduomai of the pagan Priesthoods aligned with Roman State
> Religion as 'rulers-kosmokrater of the obscurity-skotos of this age-
> aion' who engaged in 'spiritual-pneumatikos wickedness-****eia' when
> he speaks of 'principalities-arche and powers-exousia, he made-
> deigmatizo a show-deigmatizo of them openly-en-parrhesia, triumphing-
> thriambeuo'. [Colossians 2:15]
>
> This is further emphasized by his elsewhere raising a particular
> concern over the great sin of the bible. He is here using language
> 'principalities-arche' and 'powers-exousia' normally associated with a
> particular nomenclature as Kabbalistic celestial hierarchy of
> governance by which it occurs-The advocacy of equitable governance
> {homoios} as conveyed by the definition given by the Greek word hodos
> or the Hebrew word derek (German for Ruler) is a systematic approach
> to governance and autonomous {ie. autos / one's true self, the soul +
> nomos / Torah; containing its own principles of self-governance}
> rights being representative of Hebrew/Greek Judaeo-Christian belief,
> which stands in contrast to the denial of it as claimed religious
> belief.
>
> As my own Judaeo-Christian (I am at home in Hassidic Jewish Wisdom,
> Judaism at www.Torah.org, Dead Sea Scrolls and New Testament
> Christianity) religious belief is conveyed by a chronological
> interpretation of the natural and common law paradigm conveyed by the
> GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is an issue of transcendence that is at
> once concerned with an 'a priori' teleological argument of intelligent
> design associated with an Anthropic Principle, I ought in the
> cir***stance be free from hymeneal antagonism of HETEROS as
> philosophical HETERONOMY and religious MYSTICISM through being subject
> to a law or standard external to itself as AUTONOMY; In Kantian moral
> philosophy, acting in accordance with one's desires rather than reason
> or moral duty; subject to different laws.
>
> NATURAL AND COMMON LAW COSMOLOGICAL PARADIGM AT HEART OF JIHADIST
> TERRORISM
>
> Journalist Chris Merritt, makes the following comment in the 03 August
> 2007 edition of the Australian newspaper: "FOR an exceedingly bright
> fellow, Michael Kirby does a great impression of someone who has
> closed his eyes to the changed world in which we live.
>
> Sadly, he is not alone. Bright people all across the nation have been
> unable to wrap their minds around the nature of the terrorist threat.
>
> Until they do, the national response to the rise of Islamic fascism
> will be hobbled...
>
> The current threat is unorthodox. It does not fit neatly into the way
> in which countries governed by the common law respond to crime. But
> the genius of the common law is that it adapts to changing
> cir***stances. That is why it has survived." [Chris Merritt, 'Time
> Changes, But Kirby Doesn't', The Australian Newspaper 3 August 2007, p
> 1 (Ego: #433 / #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue; I-Ching:
> H49 - Revolution; Tetra: #28 - Change; Super: #294 / #9 - Inconstancy
> of Achievement/ Practising Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - Army; Tetra: #32 -
> Legion)]
>
> The views expressed by Chris Merrit raise a conceptual issue
> concerning 'nominalism' and 'realism' in that the current threat posed
> by Terrorism is an orthodox desire for Sharia Law as a Natural and
> Common Law issue.
>
> Part of the problem with this is the lack of a common cosmological
> perspective which provides a shared paradigm of mind associated with
> Number and Taxonomy. That Australia's discovery and claim as a British
> possession is really the product of improvements within cosmology
> which saw the adoption of the norm 365.2425 days for the topical year.
>
> However given the Biblical Cosmology associated to the ephemeral and
> mundane activity of the Torah priests commences its 364 days base 7
> cycle on a Wednesday 20 March Equinox and that the Saturday 23
> September Equinox following 5 x 364 + 182 days is the means for
> determining when the 'OTH or apogee of this cycle of the Bible's
> Sabbath based Everlasting Covenant occurs.
>
> That the computational norm of this 'OTH cycle when it reaches 6J as
> 294 x 364 is able to obtain the same computational norm: 293 years x
> 365.2425 as that which was later adopted by the Gregorian calendar
> reforms of 1582 CE and Great Britain in 1752 CE.
>
> If we further divide the number of days in 400 years x 365.2425 =3D
> 146097 by 22 given as our Sabbath based computational norm, we are
> able to see how this tem****al understanding of time, relates to the
> infinite in that 6000 years % 22 gives a remainder of #13 days.
>
> This is consistent with the view concerning the historical calendar
> usage of Magic Square 9(9=B2+1)/2 =3D #369 which always gives #41 on
13th
> to 17th September and that the 18th September 2001 commences the new
> moon.
>
> That this represents the "genius of the common law that adapts to
> changing cir***stances" and because of this, the rise of Islamic
> fascism will be hobbled.
>
> http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/chronicles/images/nous.gif
>
> That the exquisite beauty of the Australian Constitution lies in the
> reality that it can be sustained by a Natural Law and Common Law
> mathematical model--the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON--it is both
> infallible and beyond reproach.
>
> To undertand why this is im****tant I reproduce Ehsan Ahrari's comments
> in the Asia Times of 22 July 2003, in an article titled: "Enemies from
> within: Iran and Saudi Arabia", whereby he describes the paradox
> inherent to the Chaldean {a Magian or professional astrologer}
> Literary-shepher {properly writing (the art or a do***ent); by
> implication a book:-bill, book, evidence, learning, letter, register,
> scroll} Art-lashon {the tongue (of man or animals), used literally (as
> the instrument of licking, eating, or speech), and figuratively
> (speech, an ingot, a fork of flame, a cove of water):- babbler, bay,
> evil speaker, language, talker, tongue, wedge} [Daniel 1:4]
>
> "First, they created a constitution which established the Vilayat-e-
> Faqih (rule of the clergy). As such, it made the head clergy (the
> Supreme Leader) both infallible and beyond reproach. The concept of
> infallibility is essentially an anti-Islamic concept, since from
> theological perspectives no one is infallible, save God. At the same
> time, the notion of the Vilayat-e-Faqih sowed the seeds for the
> establishment of a theological dictator****p, which was going to be as
> exclusionist of the common people as the monarchy that it replaced.
>
> The constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran is fundamentally anti-
> democratic in the sense that it allocates too much power to the
> Supreme Leader and his handpicked cronies. Only a cursory review of
> the Iranian constitution makes it clear that it has created an
> absolute dictator****p of the Supreme Leader. The Iranian parliament is
> held in check by the Council of Guardians, a body that has power to
> "examine all laws passed by the parliament to determine their
> compatibility with [the] Sharia or Islamic law". The Supreme Leader
> appoints half of the members of this council, and the second half are
> recommended by the head of the judiciary and confirmed by parliament.
>
> The radically conservative nature of the council may be underscored by
> the fact that it has been known to strike down up to 40 percent of the
> laws passed by the government."
>
> The current threat posed by Terrorism is obstensibly a Natural and
> Common Law issue associated with cosmology and the conceptual
> theological and metaphysical issues involved with the use of force
> (#237) associated with an Autonomous Sovereign entity...
>
> In Jihad Jack's cir***stance as determination made by the High Court
> of Australia, all that is necessary is to measure his conduct on given
> days and times when he is to re****t to the police--given the GRAPPLE
> HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is the paradigm to which tem****al (time / date)
> events as phenomenon may be associated and by which speech may be
> evaluated, all that the control order needs to do is take a video
> journal of the times he re****ts to police and record his response to
> innocuous questions.
>
> If the individual functions in accordance with the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC
> NOUMENON, there is simply no need for the Control Order as the
> individual's behaviour is in accordance with common law principles--
> that the war on terror requires no other exceptional response.
>
> That the teleological basis for religious belief applies equally to
> the understanding of the Kosmos as a s****ts paradigm of mind.
>
> The perspective of 122J3W1D as being equivalent to 6,000 topical years
> of 365.2425 days and the Sabbath Year arises from the observation that
> the Equinox on DATE(1996,3,20)+(5*364)+182 =3D 12 September 2001 is the
> 1st day of the 7th solar month and that the 22nd Priestly Course
> following as Gamul {a recompense} within this 6th Year was the subject
> of considerable appraisal in which the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur)
> occurred and conjecture as reprise of the Torah 364 day Genesis
> Cosmogony: "Cosmologists have concocted a way for an endless stream of
> big bangs to occur spontaneously throughout space and time, each
> triggering the birth of a 'bubble' universe somewhere and somewhen in
> the boundless multiverse, with each bubble governed internally by its
> very own by-laws.
>
> However, their calculations appeal to quantum mechanics, relativity
> and a host of other conventional oddments from the standard tool kit
> of theoretical physics. Accepting such meta-laws as given--true
> without reason or explanation--merely ****fts the mystery of the laws
> of physics in our universe up a level, to that of the meta-laws in the
> multiverse.
>
> The basic difficulty can be traced back to the traditional concept of
> a physical law. Since at least the time of Isaac Newton, the laws of
> physics have been treated as immutable, universal, eternal
> relation****ps--infinitely precise mathematical rules that transcend
> the physical universe and inhabit an abstract other-worldly realm.
>
> These perfect rules were supposedly imprinted on the universe--
> somehow--from outside, at the moment of cosmic creation, and haven't
> changed an iota since. In particular, the laws care nothing for what
> is actually happening in the universe, however violent the physical
> processes may be. So the universe depends on the laws, but the laws
> are strangely independent of the universe.
>
> Four hundred years on, physicists still cling to this model of
> physical law, even though they have no idea what the external source
> of the laws might be. So long as science appeals to something outside
> the universe, we must abandon any hope of ultimately understanding why
> the universe is as it is. A large element of mystery will lie forever
> beyond our reach.
>
> There is, however, another possibility: relinquish the notion of
> immutable, transcendent laws and try to explain the observed behavior
> entirely in terms of processes occurring within the universe. As it
> happens, there is a growing minority of scientists whose concept of
> physical law departs radically from the orthodox view and whose ideas
> offer an ideal model for developing this picture." [Physicist Paul
> Davies, How the Universe Got Its Laws -- and our surprising role in
> shaping them, New Scientist -- New Ideas Innovation issue 30 June
> 2007, p 30]
>
> Telos [122J3W1D] =3D Arch [3W1D] + c=B2 [9(9=B2+1)/2]
> The 364 day Jubilee chronological equivalent to 122J3W1D as 6,000
> topical years of 365.2425 days is 6020 years of 364 days + 175 days
> and which has proximity to the DATE(1996,3,20)+175 =3D 11 September 1996
>
> 1st Year - 'oth cycle of 1092 days / +3W1D
> 20-Mar-1996 as 22nd =3D Gamul
> 19-Jun-1996 as 11th =3D Elia****b
> 18-Sep-1996 as 24th =3D Maaziah
> 18-Dec-1996 as 13th =3D Huppah
>
> 2nd Year / +3W2D
> 19-Mar-1997 as 2nd =3D Jedaiah
> 18-Jun-1997 as 15th =3D Bilgah
> 17-Sep-1997 as 4th =3D Seorim
> 17-Dec-1997 as 17th =3D Hezir
>
> 3rd Year / +3W3D
> 18-Mar-1998 as 6th =3D Mijamin
> 17-Jun-1998 as 19th =3D Pethahiah
> 16-Sep-1998 as 8th =3D Abijah
> 16-Dec-1998 as 21st =3D Jachin
>
> 4th Year - 'oth cycle of 1092 days / +3W4D
> 17-Mar-1999 as 10th =3D Shecaniah
> 16-Jun-1999 as 23rd =3D Delaiah
> 15-Sep-1999 as 12th =3D Jakim
> 15-Dec-1999 as 1st =3D Jehoiarib
>
> 5th Year / +3W5D
> 15-Mar-2000 as 14th =3D Jeshebeab
> 14-Jun-2000 as 3rd =3D Harim
> 13-Sep-2000 as 16th =3D Immer
> 13-Dec-2000 as 5th =3D Malchijah
>
> 6th Year / +3W6D
>
> 14-Mar-2001 as 18th =3D Happizzez
> 13-Jun-2001 as 7th =3D Hakkoz
> 12-Sep-2001 as 20th =3D Jehezekel
>
> =3DDATE(1996,3,20)+(5*364)+182 =3D 12 September 2001 as 22nd Gamul 23-29
> Sept 2001 (Begins Sabbath year)
>
> 12-Dec-2001 as 9th =3D Jeshua
>
> Given this teleological premise, a S****TS ARENA's adoption, deployment
> and representation of geometric principles isn't just compliant with
> the cosmological laws associated with SPACE (1 - FOCUS/X; 2 - EQUITY/
> Y; 3 - RATIO/Z) but also to TIME. Within this context the GRAPPLE
> HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON, might in the future be deployed to provide the
> architectural basis for interactive s****ts involving:
>
> a) Entity managed Avatars
> b) Autonomous Avatars
> c) Probability functions as what-if against human action
> d) Eternity upon which tem****al human biopsychological function occurs
>
> That this conveys a common cosmological perspective which provides a
> shared paradigm of mind associated with Number and Taxonomy--that if
> s****ting fraternities adopt the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON as the
> basis for hosting its semantical world as belief system, that this, in
> its deployment of theological and metaphysical principles will
> continue to place preassures on religious life.
>
> In so doing s****ts technology will continue to assimilate theological
> and metaphysical principles associated with virtue and ethics which
> religious life has heretofore been incapable of embracing: "The
> burgeoning field of computer science has ****fted our view of the
> physical world from that of a collection of interacting material
> particles to one of a seething network of information. In this way of
> looking at nature, the laws of physics are a form of software, or
> algorithm, while the material world--the hardware--plays the role of a
> gigantic computer." [Physicist Paul Davies, How the Universe Got Its
> Laws -- and our surprising role in shaping them, New Scientist -- New
> Ideas Innovation issue 30 June 2007, p 30]
>
> - dolf
> http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/Chronicles/ICreate.html
|
