dolf wrote:
> Emil Sch=FCrer comments that Philo also relates a view of Sejanus (20
> BCE-31 CE) who shared the proconsole with Caesar Tiberius until his
> execution in 31 CE for the presumption of attempting to seize power.
> He made great exertions in Rome to destroy the whole nation, and that
> in Judaea, Pilate {ie., the name from the Latin pileatus, 'wearing the
> pileus', which was the 'cap or badge of a manumitted {ie. to send from
> one's hand or control a} slave',
OK: DOLF, you're AN IDIOT.
1/ Can't you construct your sentences a bit better? - it's horrendous.
2/ there's no such thing as "pileatus".
3/ "pilleatus" means "wearing the pilleus" (a felt cap worn at feasts,
especially at Saturnalia AS WELL AS by manumitted slaves), as in Livy:
"servos ad pilleum vocare" and "fratres pilleatus" for Castor &
Pollux.
4/ Pontius was "PILATUS", which would mean "armed with a Pilum". A
Pilum is a javelin, and has nothing whatsoever to do with felt caps.
----
So, when you stray off your chosen path of "Noumenon Grapple"
gibberish, you encounter the COLD HARD WORLD of TESTABLE FACTS.
And you FAIL, because you are full of ****.
-----
BEYOND facts, we have the realm of analysis, and in this you don't
even get past START.
PLEASE EXPLAIN, WTF Pontius Pilate could possibly be doing
"treasonably" in relation to Judaism when he was NOT A JEW.
What kind of a stupid, stupid, contention are you trying to make?
|
