On Jul 15, 6:19=A0am, dolf <dolfb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Dear reader,
>
> The meta descriptor [#174 / #209 - Good or #174 / #142 - Bad]
> inclination and moral dichotomy also has a bearing on the Australian
> Commonwealth as aggregation of six nomarchies by the monarchy Queen
> "VICTORIA, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain
> and Ireland, Queen, Defender of the Faith, and so forth."
>
> #209 - #8 #200 #1 =3D To ease the bowels; excrements, dung
> #142 - #40, #6, #90, #1, #5 =3D Out-goings, descents or lineages;
> privies or sewers
>
> If I were to examine a copy of a title deed for Town Lot signed by the
> Lieutenant Governor Charles La Trobe on 30 December 1852 [Super:
> #357 / #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional/ Abstaining from
> Desire; I-Ching: H6 =96 Conflict; Tetra: #25 - Contention; Ego: #347 /
> #28 - Opposites and Primitivism/ Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H24
> - Turning Point; Tetra: #2 - Full Circle] and enrolled in the Supreme
> Court of the Colony of Victoria on 1 February 1853 [Super: #262 / #22
> - Point to Reversal?/ Humility's Increase I-Ching: H8 - Seeking Unity;
> Tetra: #34 - Kin****p; Ego: #255 / #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse/
> Revealers of Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Truth; Tetra: #1 =96 Centre]--
> It is readily apparent by the reference to:
>
> =95 "reserved unto us all Mines of Coal" (of which bitumen is a product)
> =95 "full power to make and conduct through the said Land all Common or
> Public Drains and Sewers which may be deemed expedient"
>
> that this genre of legal do***ent falls within the faculty of law
> known as hyponomia {ie. under law, subject to law} to which principles
> the latter Letter's Patent to the Australian Constitution of 1901 also
> conforms."
>
> Which under Section IX - And We do hereby reserve to Ourselves Our
> heirs and successors, full power and authority from time to time to
> revoke, alter, or amend these Our Letters Patent, as to Us or them
> shall seem meet."
>
> "VICTORIA, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain
> and Ireland, Queen, Defender of the Faith, and so forth:--
>
> To all to whom these Presents shall come, Greeting. Whereas in
> conformity with the Laws now in force for the Sale of Crown Lands in
> our Colony of VICTORIA, and Our Royal Instructions under Our Signet
> and Sign Manual, issued in pursuance thereof, Heugh Glass of Melbourne
> has become Purchaser of the Allotment or Parcel of Land hereinafter
> described for the Sum of Three Hundred Pounds Sterling; Now Know Ye,
> That for and in consideration of the said Sum for and on Our behalf,
> well and truly paid into the Colonial Treasury of Our said Colony,
> before these Presents are issued, And in further consideration of the
> Quit-Rent hereinafter reserved, WE HAVE GRANTED and for Us, Our Heirs
> and Successors, DO HEREBY GRANT unto said Heugh Glass his Heirs and
> Assigns, Subject to the several and respective Reservations
> hereinafter, mentioned, ALL THAT Allotment or Parcel of Land in our
> said Colony containing by Admeasurement one rood {ie. a crucifix,
> especially a large one; a unit of length in the imperial system
> varying locally from 51/2 to 8 yards; a unit of land measure in the
> imperial system, equal to 40 square rods or 1/4 acre (approximately
> 1011.714 m_) cf: Macquarie Dictionary =A9 2005} situated in the County
> of Bourke Parish of Jika Jika being Allotment No: [description
> omitted] with all the Rights and Appurtenances whatsoever thereto
> belonging; TO HOLD unto the said Hugh Glass his Heirs and Assigns for
> ever, YIELDING and Paying therefore Yearly unto Us, Our Heirs and
> Successors, the Quit-Rent of One Peppercorn for ever if demanded;
> PROVIDED NEVERTHELESS, AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE unto Us, Our Heirs and
> Successors, all Mines of Coal; AND WE DO ALSO RESERVE unto us, Our
> Heirs and Successors, and to the Lieutenant Governor for the time-
> being of our said Colony, by such Person or Persons as shall be by
> Them or Him authorised in that behalf, full power to make and conduct
> through the said Land all Common or Public Drains and Sewers which may
> be deemed expedient; IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, we have caused this Our
> Grant to be sealed with the Seal of Our said Colony." [Witness Our
> Trusty and Well-beloved Charles Joseph La Trobe, Esquire, Lieutenant
> Governor of Our said Colony and its Dependencies, at Melbourne,
> VICTORIA, aforesaid, this Thirtieth day of December in the Sixteenth
> Year of Our Reign, And in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand eight
> hundred and fifty two (1852)]=94
>
>
That this specific Crown Land allotment entry subsequently enabled
=93Saint Andrews Street to be one of the roads reserved as private in
said sub-divisions as a carriageway in favour of abutting owners=94 when
viewed in the context of the sale of a property made on 27 July 1852,
may be considered as conforming to the Semitic / Egyptian Principle of
CHET (#8) NUN (#50) TETH (#9) assigned to the establishment of First
Principles.
That my teleological statement cir***scribing the Letters Patent to
the Australian Constitution of 1901 and the teleological argument in
sup****t of the origin of the English language expressed in association
to a PRIVATE PARKING RIGHT (Layer # 9 as autonomic progression =96
vCoral: inner intellect (super-ego)) and property as CARRIAGEWAY in
common with THE TELSTRA EXCHANGE (Layer #8 as transformative prototype
=96 vCyan: outer intellect (ego)) in compliance to the implied
HYPONOMIC / HYPERNOMIC requirements of the NOMARCHY (Layers #1 to #7
as (#142 - metaEvil) =3D #40, #6, #90, #1, #5 =3D Out-goings, descents or
lineages; privies or sewers; as #(209 =96 metaGood) =3D #8 #200 #1 : To
ease the bowels; excrements, dung) associated to these CROWN LAND
ALLOTMENTS, ought not in any way mitigate the obligations to Section 8
of the Letters Patent of 1900 by others.
- dolf
http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/missionAccomplished.html#METAGOOD
> On Jul 15, 5:50=A0am, dolf <dolfb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > You are unrepentant Yishai and continuing to be a liar.
>
> > The biblical narrative and the Priestly tradition is entirely
> > dependent upon a 364 day oral tradition obtained from a nomenclature--
> > not a 19 year metonic calendar.
>
> > - dolf
>
> > On Jul 14, 6:25=A0pm, Yishai <yibam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 14, 9:46=A0am, dolf <dolfb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > You don't need to be self-deprecating Edward Ruvinski--an apology
w=
ill
> > > > do!
>
> > > You do not write the rules, Dolf....
>
> > > Just the calculations that take into account Roman idolatry, but not
> > > Jewish tradition.
>
> > > No need to apologise. Just stop posting.
>
> > But Ramchal (Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzatto 1707-1746 CE) makes a very
> > astute point that has bearing on a lot of things having to do with how
> > we=92re to grow in our spirit.
>
> > He asserts that while one person might be moved to change by one thing
> > or another, someone else might be repelled by the very same thing, and
> > vice versa -- and yet both would need to grow. So it=92s obvious that
> > we=92d have to know what inspires us and what doesn=92t if we=92re to
m=
ove
> > ahead. He says that there are three sorts of people over-all as far as
> > spiritual yearnings are concerned: =93those who fully understand (what
> > matters most)=94, =93those of somewhat lesser understanding (than
they)=
=94,
> > and =93the great majority of people=94; or, put simply, there are
peopl=
e
> > in search of spiritual excellence indeed, there are also people not
> > quite there but on the way, and there are some who are willing to
> > settle for spiritual mediocrity but who could be inspired to do better
> > if given the right impetus.
>
> > For the truth of the matter is that not everyone yearns for nearness
> > to G-d or for a chance to dwell close to Him and to bask in His light
> > forever. While we contend that everyone=92s soul yearns to do that,
> > since the soul originated in G-d=92s Being and would love to =93go
back
> > home=94 for good, the lower elements of one=92s being can actually be
> > repelled by the thought. [Spiritual Excellence, (c) 2008 Rabbi Jaakov
> > Feldman, The Path of the Just Ch. 4 (Part 1). Project Genesis]
>
> > Within Integral Psychology =96 Consciousness, Spirit, Psychology,
> > Therapy, =A9 2000 Ken Wilber provides the following minor reservation
> > with respect to Spiral Dynamics as =93not sufficiently includ[ing]
> > states of consciousness nor the higher, transpersonal structures of
> > consciousness; and it is an example of a phase-2 model {ie.
> > Specifically evolutionary or developmental (a =91growth-to-goodness=92
> > model), with the spectrum of consciousness unfolding in developmental
> > stages or levels} and not enough phase-3 {ie. autonomic developmental
> > lines added to those developmental levels=97that is, numerous
different
> > developmental lines (such as cognition, cognitive, affective, moral,
> > psychological, spiritual, etc.) proceeding in a relatively independent
> > manner through the basic levels of the overall spectrum of
> > consciousness}. Phase-4 added the idea of the four quadrants=97the
> > subjective (Intentional - Formula of Universal Law), objective
> > (Behavioural - Formula of Humanity), intersubjective (Cultural -
> > Formula of Autonomy), and inter-objective (Social - Formula of
> > Progression of individual phenomena) dimensions=97of each of those
> > levels and lines, with the result being=97or at least attempting to
be=
=97a
> > comprehensive or integral philosophy (vMeme/Moment Kabbalah Cube
> > Matrix -- 9(9=B2+1)/2 =3D #369 : Organisation of the myriad or number
o=
f
> > things)=97The present book Ken Wilber claims, is of course a phase-4
> > work.
>
> > That is, there is not enough sensitivity to the empirically
> > demonstrated fact that different developmental lines can be at
> > different levels in the same instance: not just that a person can be
> > using a red meme in one cir***stance and an orange meme in another,
> > but that a person, in the same cir***stance, can be cognitively orange
> > and morally red. Finally Spiral Dynamics does not sufficiently
> > distinguish between enduring and transitional.=94
>
> > Although this vinaigrette really is in the field of analytical
> > psychiatry, the neural-linguistic fascination I presently have here as
> > my current informal research conundrum is the meta descriptor [#174 /
> > #209 - Good or #174 / #142 - Bad] inclination and moral dichotomy as
> > occurring outside the spiral level of development equated to the
> > discriminating norm of human rationalism and cognition. But as
> > occurring at the vBeige level which Ken Wilber calls the "sensorimotor
> > instincts and perceptions" and providing the obvious analogy to a path
> > (way) of good conveyed by vBeige: [0, 3, 3, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] as
> > computed meta descriptor [#174 / #209] for a 'snack food vending
> > machine':
>
> > Super / Ego
> > #0 / #0
> > #69 / #69
> > #58 / #70
> > #47 / #70
>
> > Super: #69 - Profound Use/ Function of the Mysterious; I-Ching: H34 -
> > Strength of Greatness; Tetra: #22 - Resistance, Ego: #69 - Profound
> > Use/ Function of the Mysterious; I-Ching: H34 - Strength of Greatness;
> > Tetra: #22 - Resistance, Nuance: #69 - Profound Use/ Function of the
> > Mysterious; I-Ching: H34 - Strength of Greatness; Tetra: #22 -
> > Resistance
>
> > "And the Lord God said, 'It is not proper that man should be alone; I
> > will make for him a partner similar to himself.'"
>
> > Super: #58 - Political Reversal/ Adaptation to Change; I-Ching: H43 -
> > Resolution; Tetra: #29 - Decisiveness, Ego: #70 -
>
> ...
>
> read more =BB
|
