Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Christian in Australia > Re: "Thinker" o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 42 Topic 13203 of 14134
Post > Topic >>

Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?

by "Elder(:)Child" <yoodaw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 20, 2008 at 11:27 AM

On May 20, 12:01=A0pm, "s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <swa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On May 21, 1:56=A0am, "Elder(:)Child" =A0wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 19, 10:36=A0pm, gswa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > > On May 13, 3:13=A0am, "Elder(:)Child" wrote:
>
> > > <snip>
>
> > > > be of those who follow The Messiah on =93The Way to The Truth of
The=

> > > > Life=94.
>
> > > John 1 : 40 (b) - 42
> > > Andrew, Simon Peter's brother, first found his own brother, Simon,
and=

> > > said to him, "We have found the Messiah, which is, being
interpreted,
> > > the Christ.
> > > And he brought him to Jesus and when Jesus saw him, he said,
> > > "You are Simon, the son of Jona. You shall be called 'Cephas'
> > > which is by interpretation, 'A Stone.'
>
> > > John 4 : 25 - 26
> > > The woman said to Him, "I know that Messiah is coming, which is
> > > called
> > > 'Christ': and when He comes He will teach us all things.
> > > Jesus said to her, "I, Who am speaking to you, am He.'
>
> <snip>
>
> > "The Way of Truth is evil spoken of" because of pagan "catholicism"
>
> Yes, the Church at Rome added to the New Testament scriptures heresies
> and traditions from about 300 AD, even through to 1950 when the
> (supposed) assumption (ascendency) of (incorrectly) named virgin Mary
> (she did nor remain a virgin after the birth of Jesus (she consummated
> her delayed marriage with Joseph and had other children for Jesus was
> her first-born not her
> only-born child. =A0And she was not the Mother of God; she was the
> mother of the earthy (physical) body of Jesus Christ.
>
> > and her harlot pagan "christian" daughters ;-( Their "imag"ined "Jesus
> > Christ" is not The Messiah!
>
> Jesus Christ was not 'imagined'. He was an historical person who was
> crucified by the Romans after some Jews agreed and declared."Let His
> blood be on us and on our children" - tragically continued through the
> centuries by those who misread the scriptures.
>
> It was some five hundred years ago that> they named one head of their
thre=
e-headed pagan "god", "jesus", during
> > a time that has been called the "reformation". Prior to that time
> > there was no "j" sound in the english language.......period.......
>
> It does not matter if there was a 'j' =A0or not in the English language
> up to five hundred years ago. The spelling now is 'Jesus' and most
> people have either vaguely heard of Him, while others believe that He
> was the only begotten Son of God (John 3 : 16) and have trusted Him
> for their Eternal salvation. 'For by grace are we saved through faith
> and that not of ourselves, it is the gift of God; not of works, lest
> anyone should boast. (Ephesians 2 : 8 - 9)
>
> > Yet the "reformation" was an aptly named time! For it was a time when
> > "catholicism" birthed her harlot "christian" daughters ;-( =A0Her
> > "christian" daughters are of her substance ;-( Her substance was
> > merely "reformed" so that her "christian" daughters might appear a bit
> > differently outwardly, =A0yet inwardly they remained liken unto their
> > pagan harlot mother ;-(
>
> No, there was a definite difference.
> Catholicism did not 'birth' her 'daughter =3D Protestantism. Go and read
> your Church history.
> Christians are not perfect as God is perfect. Are you perfect as God
> is perfect and have been commissioned by God to decry all others
> except yourself?.
>
> > "christianity" is but the byproduct of the fornicative relation****p
> > pagan "catholicism" has always had with "the god of this world", he
> > who is "the father of lies", he who is "the angel of light", 'd'evil
> > spirit that rules over this wicked world ;-(
> > All religious systems, muslin, jewish, buddhist, catholic,
> > christian ,,etc,, are Anti-Messiah!
>
> So what is your religious system? Is it perfect?
> What place does Jesus Christ (however you spell His name) have in your
> system?.
> The Trinity is recorded in the New Testament if you take the time to
> look or check through Internet sites using the word' Trinity' as your
> search,
>
> > Religious systems of this world, all alike they are,
> > Their captives have fought, killed and died, both near and far ;-(
>
> In some instances, that is true.
> During the Second World War I did farm'housework with my High School
> studies, I collected old metal as a Girl Guide. I subscribed to War
> Saving Stamps - yes, we had to fight against Hitler, Mussolini and
> Tojo as they sought to impose their dictatorial systems on the world.
> I sup****ted the war effort so it could ve said that I 'fought'. I was
> too young to go into the armed services.
> It was a tragic time. I suffered health problems that took years to
> resolve and only through Christian prayer in St Andrew's Anglican
> Cathedral (Sydney) - not spontaneous, miraculous, but through a long
> convalescent period.
>
> > And then once a week, or multiple times a day they may pray,
> > Yet as hypocrites they begin each new day ;-(
> > Days that are filled with deceit and lies,
> > For in a "religious system" Truth can not abide ;-(
>
> That is one of the most stupid statements I have heard in all my
> life.
>
> <snip>
>
> > The Messiah testified, "whoever lives and believes in Me (His
Teachings
> > and Life example) shall never die." =A0And then The Messiah
> > questioned, =A0 "Do you believe this?" =A0 =A0 =A0YES!
>
> > And you? =A0 =A0 =A0 Do you believe? =A0 =A0Or do you believe in
death?
>
> Believing in Jesus Christ (the Messiah) does not bring eternal death.
> He is the Way, the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father
> except through Him. (John 14 - 6)
>
> Gladys Swager- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

simply, sad for you because Truth has been given and
you yet reject Truth and believe the pagan catholic
and christian lies ;-(

you avoid the undeniable proof of The Messiah's GOD
given birth Name!

the greek word "iesous" is translated both as "Joshua"
and the pagan 'jesus', except in the original kjv where
they declared "Joshua" of the old testimonies to be
'jesus' ;-(

now if you wish to take the liberty to change the name
of the old testament "Joshua" to the pagan 'jesus', well
that is you choice!

and worse yet you could accept the greek word "iesous"
to be both "Joshua" and the pagan 'jesus' which makes
you a daughter of the author of confusion!

and so it is i am but sad for you ;-(

yet there is hope!

for Miracles do happen!

Yahshua(Joshua in modern day english) is The Messiah,
The Son of The Living GOD!
 




 42 Posts in Topic:
"Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-03 11:37:29 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-03 14:30:24 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-04 06:56:05 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-04 16:07:13 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-07 03:11:33 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-07 22:40:04 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-20 16:17:50 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-11 22:52:00 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-12 10:12:12 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-14 13:57:56 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-12 10:13:55 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-14 13:57:55 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
gswager@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-19 21:36:35 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-20 08:56:05 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-20 11:01:54 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-20 11:17:19 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-20 11:27:46 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-07 05:31:47 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-05 06:18:36 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-05 20:15:47 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-07 12:46:48 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-09 13:55:58 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-14 07:11:33 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-20 20:42:42 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-21 01:40:54 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-07 19:29:27 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-09 13:55:59 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-21 08:01:49 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
gswager@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 17:16:09 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-08 17:33:43 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-21 19:29:18 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-09 07:20:43 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-12 14:19:13 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-09 22:32:46 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-10 07:09:17 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-05 21:16:56 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-05 23:42:31 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-06 07:51:21 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-07 13:51:54 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-06 15:40:37 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-07 15:49:00 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-06 20:39:41 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Sep 8 2:28:48 CDT 2008.