Re: Hell (was The Wall)

"**Rowland Croucher**" <rccroucher@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:482a9aba$0$1023$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Chris Bell wrote:
>> Chuck Stamford wrote:
>>> "Chris Bell" <cbell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> <>
>>> But it's also a non sequitur here, as I said.  Rowland isn't changing 
>>> his beliefs over time.
>
> I have, of course, as everyone who isn't vegetative does :-) It's called

> moving from simplicity this side of complexity to simplicity on the
other 
> side of complexity...

We're talking about your practice of passing out a smorgasbord of opinions

to neophytes, which has nothing to do with you changing your beliefs over 
time like everyone else does.

>
>>>He's handing out a list of contradictory beliefs to people seeking the 
>>>truth, and saying, in effect, take your pick!
>
> As the NT does...

Nonsense, and despicable nonsense at that.  You never cease to amaze me, 
Rowland.  I think you've dragged what is sacred through as much filth as
is 
possible for a person calling themselves a Christian to do, and then you
up 
and do yourself one worse.

Now you're suggesting that the NT can't make up it's mind what is right. 
Why even read it then??

Chuck Stamford






, but Martin Luther, for one, couldn't choose between
> James' and Paul's stance on works/faith, so chose one over the other - 
> forgetting that the big picture is larger than his little mind...
> <>
>> Chris
> -- 
>
>
> Shalom/Salaam/Pax!                         Rowland Croucher
>
> http://jmm.aaa.net.au/
  (20,000 articles 4000 humor)
>
> Blogs - http://rowlandsblogs.blogspot.com/
>
> Justice for Dawn Rowan - http://dawnrowansaga.blogspot.com/
>
> Funny Jokes and Pics - http://funnyjokesnpics.blogspot.com/