Re: I don't laugh at atheists. They have accepted indoctrinations.

On May 13, 9:38=A0am, Chris Bell  wrote:
> s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > On May 6, 12:17 am, "Lu R" wrote:
>
>*snip*
>
> > First came creation.
> > Living had to produce living.
> > Macro-evolutionists avoid that issue as they would avoid the plague.
>
> >*snip*
>
> I have just read a book review in the last week's New Scientist (p.47).
> The last paragraph reads
>
> "We can redesign life, but are we any closer to its definition? Regis
> (lead author of the book being reviewed) thinks so. Synthetic biology
> and biotechnology have introduced the concept of "minimal life"....Regis
> argues that life is "embodied metabolism". It is a provocative claim
> that is sure to generate debate."
>
> The issue is not avoided, but actively debated. You should try to keep
> up with that debate if you wish to comment on it in public fora without
> making a fool of yourself.
>
I speak/post  from my understandings. I do not think I am making a
'fool' of myself. The fact is 'abiogensis' - ie living things can be
produced from non-living matter -  has not been proved up to this day
in May 2008,

'Embodied metabolism' - Do you mean that scientists think they can
give life to non-living particles/molecules?
Will they have solved the creation problem if they achieve that?
No, because the original creation was 'ex-nihilo' - out of nothing.
God spoke and that which did not exist came into being by the power of
His word.

In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word
was God. All things were made by Him, and without Him was nothing made
that was made.   John 1 : 1, 3.

It is a pity, no, it is a tragedy, that there are scientists
(atheists, I assume) who are so intent on spending millions of dollars
for their efforts trying to prove that they might bring life from non-
life when there are so many problems within the world's populations of
today.
Is it, that hopefully making a name for themselves with posterity, is
more im****tant to them than humanitarian efforts with today's needy.
>
Gladys Swager