Chuck Stamford wrote:
> "lynx" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:IILVj.277$IK1.248@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Chuck Stamford wrote:
>>
>>> "Sean McHugh" <seanm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:4826C64B.8D42212C@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>> lynx wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Chuck Stamford wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> How could ANYONE, putting their trust in this Person, and being
>>>>>> conversant
>>>>>> with the NT, even suggest or allow anyone to believe they
questioned
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> existence of this place of eternal punishment for the wicked;
however
>>>>>> Jesus
>>>>>> went on to define the "wicked". Yet that is EXACTLY what our
>>>>>> "minister"
>>>>>> Rowland does at every op****tunity. However, as with so many
>>>>>> mealy-mouthed
>>>>>> "Christians" these days, they are too cowardly to be "up front"
about
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>> They use carefully worded sentences, and they quote others a great
>>>>>> deal, and
>>>>>> they package the whole thing as a "teaching" exercise. Well, the
fact
>>>>>> is,
>>>>>> no one needs a teacher here. All they need know is how to read,
and
>>>>>> how to
>>>>>> make up their own minds about what they've read. There is no
question
>>>>>> Jesus
>>>>>> taught Hell.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Right again Chuck. There's no question about it. The evidence is
>>>>> plentiful.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> The question is, do you believe it?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Are you asking me?
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, despite later letting you off the hook, he was clearly
addressing
>>>> you (did I mean someone else?).
>>>>
>>> Sean, once again you fa****on yourself in some epistemic position to
know
>>> for a fact what I intended when what I wrote is open to more than one
>>> interpretation, as indeed, most statements, let alone whole
paragraphs,
>>> are. When are you going to learn that all doing this does is make you
>>> look rather dull of wit. I find it a remarkable constrast to what you
>>> are capable of bringing to a debate or discussion, and yet you do it
>>> over, and over again.
>>>
>>> Do you have any explanation for that?
>>>
>>>
>> I do. He's an arrogant twit!
>>
>
> Sigh. I see you refuse to get off the fence on yet another issue, Pete.
;-)
>
LOL! thanks Chuck I got a laugh out of that! :)
> All the best,
>
> Chuck Stamford
>
>
--
rgds,
Pete
=====
http://pw352.blogspot.com/
'I'm not young enough to know everything' -Oscar Wilde
|
