Re: e: Hell II (Was: Rational thought etc.)

lynx wrote:
 
> Sean McHugh wrote:
>
>> lynx wrote:
>>
>>  
>>> Sean McHugh wrote:
>>>    
>>>> lynx wrote:
>>>>       
>>> I'm sorry that the concept/teaching of hell
>>> bothers you so much.     
>>
>> No, you are sorry that you are floundering.
>>
>>  
>>> It [concept/teaching of hell] doesn't bother me.
>>>     
>>
>> Of course not. What bothers you is that it is _not_ being taught.
>
> Not true.
>
>>  
>>  
>>> [I'm sorry that the concept/teaching of hell bothers you so much. It 
>>> doesn't bother me.] Perhaps that's due to your experiences during 
>>> your school days that you mentioned recently.
>>>     
>>
>> If you can't play the ball (and clearly you can't) then play the
>> player . . . right Pete?
>
> No wrong. You just want to argue/be argumentative and won't accept 
> anything I say, and/or simply don't see things the way I do. So just a 
> waste of time talking to you from my POV. I put you in the same basket 
> as Lawrence. Hope that helps. Enjoy (?) the company!
>   
 
btw.. this is a perfect example. you spoke of your experience in 
Catholic schools with their teaching about hell, no one forced you to, I 
refer to it, but that's me having a go at you according to you! Sheesh! 
you really are the most disagreeable person I've ever come accross. 
Whatever else Morkie may be, at least he's more reasonable than you, at 
least these days. and I just read the rest of your diatribe- i just 
skimmed it before- it's all about having a go at me, as is usual for 
you. get a life you 'cranky old bastard'!