On Wed, 7 May 2008 13:22:25 +1000, Polly the Parrot
<flatulantdingo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Tue, 6 May 2008 20:08:38 -0700 (PDT) dolf <dolfboek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>> With respects to the Federation discussion on separation of church and
>> state and the time of Australia's adoption of the Commonwealth, I
>> demonstrate from the following historical comments of the time, that
>> the usage of the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON as AUTONOMIC OVERLAY as
>> claim to Religious belief is compatible to the ideals expressed within
>> ‘Churches and Federation’
>
>Of course it does. Never mind, a good lie down might make you feel
>better before nursie gives you a sponge bath.
So you agree that the usage of the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON
as AUTONOMIC OVERLAY as claim to Religious belief is compatible to the
ideals expressed within ‘Churches and Federation’, but do you understand
WTF
it means?
Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
|
