Re: Christianity and Naturism

On May 4, 5:44=A0pm, Zee <jonZ...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 4, 5:58=A0pm, Dan MacKay <cal1f...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 2:10=A0pm, Zee <jonZ...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 4, 12:18=A0pm, Dan MacKay <cal1f...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 4, 9:52=A0am, Zee <jonZ...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 4, 11:05=A0am, s****tbug <MikeNCalifor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote=
:
>
> > > > > > On May 4, 6:19=A0am, Zee <jonZ...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On May 3, 12:19=A0pm, Anna <annalidd...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On May 3, 1:29 am, "Dario Western"
<dariowest...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >
>http://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=3D28296876749385=
67033&q=3Dsour...
>
> > > > > > > > > Here is a video that I made about the correlation
between =
Christianity and
> > > > > > > > > naturism.
>
> > > > > > > > I believe that naturism and Christianity can exist as long
a=
s the
> > > > > > > > naturism doesn't turn into ***ualized ****ity.
>
> > > > > > > > Of course this guy disagrees.
>
> > > > > > >
>http://www.themarriagebed.com/pages/bible/app/naturism.shtml
>
> > > > > > > > He has a good point as it relates to swingers.
>
> > > > > > > > But I believe he is wrong when he talks about "secret
naturi=
sts".
> > > > > > > > They aren't being secret. People don't have the right to
kno=
w
> > > > > > > > everything about you. So if you don't want to tell certain
p=
eople
> > > > > > > > about your naturist activities because you know it would
off=
end them,
> > > > > > > > that is just being polite, not secretive.
>
> > > > > > > so the preacher says lets try naturism and everybody takes
off=
 their
> > > > > > > clothes and a 12 year ol boy starts jackin off....then what
do=
 you do
> > > > > > > join him......jz- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > now come on now, JOnz...why do you keep on repeating this boy
ja=
cking
> > > > > > off when that not the real topic of discussion or part of even
t=
hough
> > > > > > jacking off did not happen?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > Bug...Anna said ****ism was ok in church if it was non ***ual and
D=
ario
> > > > > said a boy about that age was jackin off when ****d at a ****ist
> > > > > place....so it must follow if the folks get ****d in a church
then=
 a
> > > > > boy might jack off and that makes it ***ual...can you understand
> > > > > now....jz- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > But to a child that age it is not necessarilly "***ual", he may be
> > > > doing that just because "it feels good".
>
> > > > If that is what he was doing.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > so you admit you as a ****ist..... is satins little boy and want to
> > > provoke a child to jack off....OTOH =A0Christian Churches know about
> > > your kind and try to steer children away from these provocations by
> > > promoting the covering of the body.....jz- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > How interesting.......
>
> > No I never really cared for Satin it tends to chafe.
>
> > As to your talk of "Provoking" boys to masturbate, that is not my
> > hobby, I hear you talk about masturbation quite a bit though.
>
> > I don't think I've heard of too many real Churches preaching about
> > "Covering the body", in fact I've known a couple that promote the
> > opposite, but I wouldn't expect you or "Anna" to attend those.- Hide
quo=
ted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> no because all the Christians wear clothes and never has anyone jacked
> off in Church socially..

Are you sure of that???

> ..especially the young boys demonstrate non
> ***ual behavior...

Really???

> ..but ****ist let em get ****d and that provokes a
> young boy or girl to masturbate.....do they have a reason not to....no
> because ****ity provokes a turn on...jz- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Maybe to you and "Anna".