Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Christian in Australia > Re: "Thinker" o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 42 Topic 13203 of 13505
Post > Topic >>

Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?

by "swa@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <swager@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 4, 2008 at 04:07 PM

On May 4, 11:56=A0pm, "Elder(:)Child"  wrote:
> On May 3, 3:30=A0pm, swa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
> > On May 4, 4:37=A0am, "Elder(:)Child" =A0wrote:
> Have you laid the foundation of a "thinker"?
>
<snip>
>
> > But Jesus Christ is the Way, the truth and the Life,
> > No one can come to the Father. except by Him. John 14 : 6
>
<snip>!
>
> > We are to be in the =A0world, but not of the world.
> > We receive as we develop in both our intellectual lives and our
> > spiritual lives.
> > As we think on what we have received
> > we can develop new ways more appropriate to the needs of changed times
> > but they should be in the context of the unchanging truth of the
gospel
> > of Jesus Christ.
>
<snip>

> > Through the centuries there have been those who have added to the
> > basic
> > concepts of the Christian faith. The Church at Rome was responsible
> > for much of that, some of it coming into Christianity as the leaders
> > there courted the followers of pagan religions of the Mediterranean
> > area. They added to the =A0teachings of Jesus Christ as they were
given
> > by the first disciples, so that finally there was rebellion from some
> > of their own priests; Wycliffe in England and Luther in Germany.
> > Either John Paul II did not know his church history or he only knew
> > the views of Roman Catholic theolgians when he said (I felt like
> > saying and will say it, 'the gall - boldness and effrontery) =A0in the
> > early 1980's. "All you wanderers from Rome, return!"
>
> > > And The ONE GOD, Father of ALL has given The
> > > Call to repent and:
> > > "Come out of her, MY people......."
> > > Come out this wicked, evil world and the "strong
> > > delusion" that is it's systems of religion, one of
> > > which calls itself "christianity".
>
> > Christianity has been corrupted in the past , and even as some modern
> > day evangelists over-emphasise =A0some parts of scripture or add to
> > scripture their own revelations, they continue to divide the body of
> > Christ.
>
> > > Receive all that a Loving Father has for HIS Children.
> > > Peace, in spite of the dis-ease(no-peace) that is
> > > of this world and it's systems of religion for "the
> > > WHOLE world is under the control of the evil one"
>
> > So you do not see Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God by the
> > work of the Holy Spirit through the Virgin birth as one with God the
> > Father and God the Holy Spirit (the triune God) in providing the means
> > for our salvation and the Eternal Life that Jesus promised through His
> > death,  resurrection and ascension into heaven for us?.
> > You seem to be preaching another gospel that is not the true gospel.
>
> you gladys are held captive by a jezebelic spirit ;-(
>
I can assure you that I am no Jezebel
You did not answer my question, above.

> for i suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp the authority of a
> man,
> but a woman is to remain silent! for because of woman sin entered
> into Creation ;-(
> yet there is hope!
> for Miracles do happen!
>
Yes, they do happen. I have known them in my life.
When men have not been  the leaders in truth
women have found the need to speak for truth.

> hope is there would be those who experience The Miracle that is
> receiving "a love of The Truth"!
>
You are very vague. What do you mean by 'a love of Truth' -
what truth?; whose truth?

> peace, in spite of the dis-ease(women) who are of this world.......

Above you said that 'no peace' is the disease of this world.
So do you equate ' women' with 'no peace'.
It has been the men who have brought about most of the wars in this
world.

Do you see Jesus Christ as the Prince of Life whom God raised
from the dead?    Acts 3 : 15

Gladys Swager
 




 42 Posts in Topic:
"Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-03 11:37:29 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-03 14:30:24 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-04 06:56:05 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-04 16:07:13 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-07 03:11:33 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-07 22:40:04 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-20 16:17:50 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-11 22:52:00 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-12 10:12:12 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-14 13:57:56 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-12 10:13:55 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-14 13:57:55 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
gswager@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-19 21:36:35 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-20 08:56:05 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-20 11:01:54 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-20 11:17:19 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-20 11:27:46 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-07 05:31:47 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-05 06:18:36 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-05 20:15:47 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-07 12:46:48 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-09 13:55:58 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-14 07:11:33 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-20 20:42:42 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-21 01:40:54 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-07 19:29:27 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-09 13:55:59 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-21 08:01:49 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
gswager@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 17:16:09 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-08 17:33:43 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-21 19:29:18 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-09 07:20:43 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-12 14:19:13 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-09 22:32:46 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-10 07:09:17 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-05 21:16:56 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-05 23:42:31 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-06 07:51:21 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-07 13:51:54 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-06 15:40:37 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-07 15:49:00 
Re: "Thinker" or "Receiver"?
"Elder(:)Child"  2008-05-06 20:39:41 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 11:30:55 CDT 2008.