Re: Hell (was The Wall)

On May 2, 12:32=A0pm, **Rowland Croucher**
<rccroucher@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> From: Athanasius <dcn_athanas...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
> Local: Wed, Apr 30 2008 12:14 pm
> Subject: Re: The Wall
> <>
> =A0> I do not think that Rowland believes in "Hell" as a place of pain
and=

> separation. Nor do I think Rowland believes any humans go to such a
> "hell" anyway. So in his mind he is not leading anyone there, you
> see.
>
> ***
>
> I read this today, and I can't think of a better response:
>
> Questioner, to Billy Graham on his last visit to Harvard:

I can think of quite a few better responses rather than Billy's one
here. Of course you are quoting someone that -now- believes everyone
is going to heaven and is "saved". So how one can bring him into a
discussion of the Lord's teaching of hell is beyond me. (Billy was
twice baptized by the way, only one more to go). :-)

Listen here to confirm Billy is now a Universalist.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DaxxlXy6bLH0

Of course Rowland being a universalist as well -would- quote Billy.
Akin to telling everyone they can be any religion they choose to be,
want 4 wives, become a Mormon or Muslim. Want no God and no morals
become a Buddhist. Want to have thousands of gods and wor****p cows,
become a Hindu, for in their minds all will be saved and in heaven
anyway.

"Its Church Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it. Its Church
Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, Jim!" (Doctor to
Captain Kirk).

Another video of the same, but I do not agree with the written
rhetoric necessarily:

http://www.inmyvideos.com/billy-graham-denies-jesus

Peace.