Re: Rational thought process vs creationist 'thought' processes

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:34:57 GMT, lynx <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Barry OGrady wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:52:40 GMT, lynx <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>   
>>> Sean McHugh wrote:
>>>> **Rowland Croucher** wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>>>> Sean McHugh wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>         
>>>>>> "swa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" wrote:
>>>>>>       
>>>>>> If Creation 'Science' is to be taught at all, let it be where it
>>>>>> belongs, in the religion class.
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>           
>>>>> Not in my religion class...
>>>>>     
>>>>>         
>>>>>> Sean McHugh
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>           
>>>>> Sean: can I put the gist of your post here on our website - with or
>>>>> without your name? If with your name, with a link to your current
online
>>>>> debate (I've mislaid that link and appreciate a reminder. Thanks).
>>>>>     
>>>>>         
>>>> Sure, to any/all of the above.
>>>>       
>>> Of course Rowland wants your debate on his website. He wants anything
to 
>>> promote atheism and destroy christian faith.
>>>     
>>
>> You have that wrong. Rowland wants to use Christianity to promote his
own
>> agenda.
>>   
> 
>Which is? But whatever it is, the result is as I said. By creating 
>doubt, confusion, and uncertainty about the Christian faith and it's 
>beliefs, the result is the promotion of atheism by default.

I only know Rowland from the newsgroups but it seems to me he is using
Christianity for the purpose it was originally created, which is as a base
from which to promote a POV. I think Rowland is doing what he thinks is
the right thing without regard for the original teachings of Christianity.

>> Barry
>> =====
>>
>-- 
>rgds,
>
>Pete

Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og