Re: Rational thought process vs creationist 'thought' processes

**Rowland Croucher** wrote:
 
> Sean McHugh wrote:
> <>
>> As attested by their appellation, The Creationists have started with
>> their conclusion, biblical inerrancy,
>
> .... Not to mention the irony of asserting for the Bible something it 
> doesn't assert for itself...
 
How can the bible assert anything for 'itself', dumbass! when the bible 
is a compilation of various books. It cannot refer to itself. But then 
you'll say anything to cast doubt and create confusion on matters of
faith.
 

-- 
rgds,

Pete
=====
http://pw352.blogspot.com/
'I'm not young enough to know everything' -Oscar Wilde