Re: Rational thought process vs creationist 'thought' processes

This is an amended post to fix a link (to a pdf file) and an error
(note Rowland) in the second sentence. It was Gladys who presented the
original astronomy link and that is significant to the point. Replies
to this post please. 

"swa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" wrote:
 
> On Apr 29, 6:13 pm, misanthropic_curmudgeon
> <misanthropiccurmudg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/2764/sciencevscreationismjd7.gif

> From the cartoons presented in the website it can be said both methods
> are means of *****sing what is the truth as to which facts fit best.
> 
> Both groups of scientists are equally trained.

There again is your oft repeated deception, implying that the
Creationists enjoy at least equal academic force. In the post of yours
that I previously answered, you presented a link to a Creationist
astronomy/cosmology page. I asked you how many professional
Creationist Astronomers there are. Here is the answer:

http://www.sciencebusiness.net/do***ents/thinking.pdf

~ There are only ten to fifteen thousand professional astronomers in
~ the world. 

It says 'only' but compare that to the _zero_ that Creation 'Science'
has. Of course I might have missed one. See how you go, Gladys. 

>  However, Evolutionists
> can be just reaffirming what was indoctrinated through the school
> system as the basis for further studies and research.

Creation Science is reaffirming what has been taught in _Sunday_
school.  

> The Creationists are the ones *****sing those indoctrinations both
> scientifically and theologically. 

As attested by their appellation, The Creationists have started with
their conclusion, biblical inerrancy, and _that_ is the real means by
which they do their "*****sing". The Bible can't be wrong, period!

> There is no law which states they can't do that. 

Sure, there is no law against their being ridiculous and deceptive
either. 

> It is the bias of Evolutionists that will not allow the 
> Creationists to give their ideas in schools and through the 
> media.

It's the same kind of bias there is against the teaching of astrology
alongside astronomy, alchemy alongside chemistry and numerology
alongside mathematics. There is no justification for devoting any
school time to making kids dumber (including political correctness).
If Creation 'Science' is to be taught at all, let it be where it
belongs, in the religion class. 


Sean McHugh