On Apr 27, 1:48=A0pm, Chris Bell wrote:
> > On Apr 27, 11:05 am, swa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
<snip>
>
God =A0Questions and Answers
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3008/
>
Is There a God?
http://everystudent.com/features/isthere.html
>
> A website for you Gladys (and other ID believers)
> http://www.newscientist.com/evolutionmyths
>
Chris, The website you have given tells those who read it that
'evolution is the truth' and that that truth is not taught properly.
But it does not tell that the 'Theory of Evolution' gives no
indication how the whole process started and WHO started it. It's all
a naturalistic process.
Sometime in the vast ages of the past something that was not living
suddenly of itself became living as a unicellular organism that had to
have irreducible complexity to be able to live and divide into other
organisms.
At least two of those organisms in the same place and very much at the
same time had to,. of themselves, develop male and female ***uality,
and to 'know' how to express that ***uality in reproduction.
Evolution is the 'so-so myth'.
It makes more sense that the omnipotent God Almighty created in a
perfect state, but gave humans the ability to chose
right and wrong. It is from the first choice of wrong that wrongs are
still in the world today.
The Christian faith is that as Jesus Christ overcame the wrong of
death on the cross and was raised from death, that, as He promised, He
will be with us to help us overcome wrongs as we meet them in our
cir***stances, and will, at the end of this life, experience Eternal
Life with God Almighty.
These are my thoughts as I have not read them elsewhere.
Charles Darwin, (1809 - 1882) either did not know the work of
scientists who were Christians who were responsible for the
improvements that have come or he ignored that fact.
He dropped out of medical studies (I don't blame him for that, I would
have too in the cir***stances of medical practice in those days - even
today).
He passed in theology, but evidently didn't like the idea of being
the village parson.
He appeared to be a failure, to himself and to his family.
He had an interest in nature.
On his voyage in the Beagle, in the Galapogas Islands he saw the
possiblility of solving the evolutionary problem that had first been
set by the Greek philosopher, Anaxamander, and of which his
grandfather Erasmus Darwin (1731 - 1802) wrote in his text, Zoonamia.
But what Charles Darwin actually did was to extrapolate from change
within a species to change from one species to another species, and
suggested that the fossil record would provide the evidence.
And close to 150 years later the topic is still being debated and
despite intense indoctrination (ie no other evidence to the contrary
is presented).
in the schools and universities, there are those who are stating from
the scientific evidence they have that
'Evolution (ie macro-changes from one species to another species 'up
the tree of life' didn't happen in the past and is not happening in
the present' .
The secularists have their religion =3D evolution.
The Christians have their religion =3D God created, humans sinned, God
is guiding to a better future those who put their trust in Him.
That is not to say that secularists (atheists) are not involved in
that process of improvements, but they do have a tendancy to claim all
the credits, as I am aware from my educational work and to extrapolate
that to other areas.
Even some Christians can 'jump on the bandwaggon' and claim all the
credits for themselves or their particular denomination of the
Christian church. .
Gladys Swager
|
