Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Christian in Australia > Science Disprov...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 13163 of 13252
Post > Topic >>

Science Disproves Evolution

by Pahu78@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 25, 2008 at 12:44 PM

Expansion: Big Bang or Stretching? 1

The stretching explanation, proposed here, has similarities and
differences with the big bang theory (1). Both the big bang and
stretching explanations describe a very rapid expansion of the
universe, beginning soon after time began, when not all laws of
physics applied. As one big bang authority states:

=93In its standard form, the big bang theory maintains that the universe
was born about 15 billion years ago from a cosmological singularity=97a
state in which the temperature and density are infinitely high. Of
course, one cannot really speak in physical terms about these
quantities as being infinite. One usually assumes that the current
laws of physics did not apply [during the big bang=92s rapid
expansion]. ... ONE MAY WONDER, WHAT CAME BEFORE? IF SPACE-TIME DID
NOT EXIST THEN, HOW COULD EVERYTHING APPEAR FROM NOTHING? WHAT AROSE
FIRST: THE UNIVERSE OR THE LAWS DETERMINING ITS EVOLUTION? EXPLAINING
THIS INITIAL SINGULARITY=97WHERE AND WHEN IT ALL BEGAN=97STILL REMAINS THE
MOST INTRACTABLE PROBLEM OF MODERN COSMOLOGY (2).=94 [emphasis added]

The stretching explanation, in contrast to the standard big bang
theory, does not begin at a singularity, an infinitesimal point (3).
Nor does energy expended in stretching out the heavens come from
within the universe or during its first trillionth of a trillionth of
a ten-billionth of a second (10^34 second) or less, as with the big
bang theory. Energy flowed into the universe as the stretching
progressed. According to the big bang theory, stars, galaxies, and
black holes began forming after hundreds of millions of years.
According to the stretching explanation, these bodies were formed (or
began) near the beginning of time=97during the creation week. Because
matter and starlight occupy space, they were also stretched. You can
decide which explanation the following surprising evidence supports.

1.	The analogy of =93stretching out heaven like a tent curtain=94 (Ps
104:2 and Is 40:22) suggests that the heavens existed in a smaller,
denser, finite form before the stretching began. The evidence cited in
this section titled =93Stellar Velocities,=94 =93Speeding Galaxies,=94
=93Dw=
arf
Galaxies,=94 =93Strings of Galaxies,=94 =93Star Streams,=94 =93Colliding
Galaxies,=94 and =93Helium-2 Nebulas=94 implies a finite universe before
stretching began.

2.	Andrei Linde, =93The Self-Reproducing Inflationary Universe,=94
Scientific American, Vol. 271, November 1994, p. 48.

3.	=93According to inflationary cosmology, the universe [began] growing
from a patch as small as 10-26 m, one hundred billion times smaller
than a proton, ...=94 Alan H. Guth and David I. Kaiser, =93Inflationary
Cosmology: Exploring the Universe from the Smallest to the Largest
Scales,=94 Science, Vol. 307, 11 February 2005, p. 885.

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ19.html




 1 Posts in Topic:
Science Disproves Evolution
Pahu78@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 12:44:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri May 16 22:53:16 CDT 2008.