According to the Australian of 16 April 2008 [SUPER: #366 / #77 -
Natural Guide/ Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 - Stagnation; Tetra: #57
- Guardedness / EGO: #408 / #81 - Making the Essence Clear/
Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 - Peace; Tetra: #15 - Reach]
"Australia's peak christian lobby group has joined the growing debate
about a charter of rights, saying it could be used to deprive
religious schools of the right to hire believers.
Australian Christian Lobby managing director Jim Wallace said his
organisation was concerned that the push for a charter could see
exemptions in some of the state's equal op****tunity laws to be
overridden."
Mr Wallace said the push for a charter had provoked angst within the
religious community, which felt it represented a threat to the
autonomy of all religious organsations, not just Christian ones."
For example Section 77 of the Equal Op****tunity Act No 42/1995,
enables a Church to discriminate against another person "if the
discrimination is necessary for the first person to comply with the
person's genuine religious beliefs or principles."
However, as we will see with respect to the American originating
Seventh-day Adventist--there is with respect to the Sabbath and basis
for their organizational name, nothing genuine about their religious
beliefs--and in the instance of hymeneal (marriage) based aspirational
obscurant fideism, cannot be said to apply where the Church has
sanctioned by inaction never apologized and provided restitution for
past child ***ual abuse perpetuated by its member****p--as is the case
with the Mormon Church and Jehovah's Witnesses as also being the
product of American Religious fanaticism.
I raised previously in the consideration of the reasons why Quentin
Bryce, the next governor-general is wrong on Australians Role in the
Republic, by saying that it a matter which is up to the people. That
the AUTONOMIC RIGHT of the PEOPLE under the COMMONWEALTH is
established by SECTION 8 of the Letters Patent enabling the Australian
Constitution of 1901--which is implied by the requirement of an
obligation placed upon every Australian to be 'obedient, aiding and
assisting' unto OUR said Governor General.
VIII - And We do hereby require and command all Our Officers and
Ministers, Civil and Military, and all other the inhabitants of Our
said Commonwealth to be obedient, aiding, and assisting unto Our said
Governor General, or, in the event of his death, incapacity, or
absence, to such person or persons as may, from time to time, under
the provisions of these Our Letters Patent, adminster the Government
of Our said Commonwealth.
Furthermore, I conveyed that the autonomic right of Australians as the
basis for becoming a Republic is conveyed by Section 9 of the Letters
Patent which reserves the right to amend this do***ent which lays
claim to the possession of Australia as Commonwealth and her
governance to the Sovereign:
IX - And We do hereby reserve to Ourselves Our heirs and successors,
full power and authority from time to time to revoke, alter, or amend
these Our Letters Patent, as to Us or them shall seem meet.
And that the historical claim to this Sovereignty must be seen in its
context of being associated to and having origins in the Imperial /
Religious Roman cult as a history contem****aneous to the autonomic
transformative prototype as HETEROS symbolic perspective of number--
that marriage has been understood as emulating this Sovereign function
such as illustrated by the Biblical references to the Greek notion of
Zeus and by ipso facto Hera--That it is effected by a transformative
function enacted by an institutional 3rd party rather than by act of
nature (ie. copulation) and therefore sub-ordinate to 7th day
Sabbatarian perspectives of nature as claims to Judaeo-Christian
Identity: As the Epistle to the Romans says, "To the Jew first and
also to the Greek".
The date of Wednesday 20 March / 21 March =3D 1 Nisan is historically
understood in relation to the Torah's GENESIS CREATION NARRATIVE AND
BOOKS OF THE LAW and the PROPHETS as being a perspective of the Hebrew
letters and articulation of the HRUMACHIS cycle {ie. this name is
implied by HORUS OF THE TWO HORIZONS as HARMAKHIS: "The Son of man is
Lord even of the Sabbath (which was made for man)." [Matthew 12:8;
Mark 2:28; Luke 6:5; Luke 13:15]} which commences from the date of the
Equinox of Wednesday 20 March and constitutes the zero point for the
following base-7 chronology:
D =3D 364 x 6 or 2184 days, W =3D 6D x 7, J =3D 6D x 49 =3D 107016 days as
2=
94
years x 364 or 293 years x 365.2425
There is some considerable conjecture amongst Biblical Scholars as to
the internal mechanics of the seventy weeks Messianic prophecy given
by Daniel and whether this cryptic computation is made according to
the 364 day Temple chronology or to the length of the topical year as
understood by the Babylonians--all we know from the historical record
is its probable commencement and termination point: "Seventy weeks are
determined for your people and for your holy city, to finish the
transgression, to make an end of sins, to make reconciliation for
iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up [the]
vision and prophecy, and to annoint the Most Holy.
72J2W1D [457 BCE] + 70 weeks as 490 x 364 / 365.2425 years =3D 31 (1/3)
CE
72J2W1D [457 BCE] + 490 x 365.2425 years =3D 33 CE
Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the
command to restore and build Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince, there
shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks; the street shall be built
again, and the wall, even in troublesome times. And after the sixty-
two weeks [the] Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself; and the
people of the prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the
sanctuary. The end of it shall be with a flood, and till the end of
the war desolations are determined." [Daniel 9:24-27]
The fact remains that the new era Christian literature as four Gospels
and the Apostle Paul's various Epistles were all written before the
destruction the Jerusalem Temple by the Romans in 69 CE and that they
were cognizant of this 364 Temple based chronology--And because the
SABBATH WAS MADE FOR MAN RATHER THAN MAN FOR THE SABBATH--the
transcendent notion of the 7th day as the basis for Judaeo-Christian
religious belief--can in no way be antagonistic to the Autonomic Right
of a 'right of humanity in his own person' as the reasonable desire,
moral responsibility and duty accorded to democratic regulative free-
will. That this Autonomic Right is pre-requisite to any presence,
participation and procreation as marriage right and duties within the
Commonwealth of Australia.
The consideration that religious belief, thought and conscience as an
autonomous {ie. autos / one's true self, the soul + nomos / Torah}
values expression consistently understood by Seventh-day Adventists as
Christian community of faith, being established upon the transcendent
and chronological principle of Nature known as the 7th day Sabbath of
the Decalogue, are somehow antagonistic to the natural, regulative and
metempirical principles of good governance as 'certain powers,
functions, and authorities' declared to be vested within 'the office
of Governor General and Commander in chief over Our said Commonwealth
of Australia', may be considered absurd. Historically within
Australia, there was not opposition to the inclusion of a specific
religious clause as expression of liberty that was adopted as Section
116 of the Australian Constitution of 1901 as the foundational
do***ent conveying the Principles of Natural and Regulative Philosophy
articulated by the Letters Patent to said Australian Constitution of
1901:
Section 116 of the Australian Constitution says "The Commonwealth
shall not make any law for establi****ng any religion, or for imposing
any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any
religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification
for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth"
That I have argued the justification of Australia's transition from a
Constitutional Monarchy to a Republic with a corresponding bill of
rights entirely on the philosophical basis of the 7th day having a
cosmological correspondence and the mathematic basis by which the
GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON as AUTONOMIC ENNEAD can be deployed as the
semantical engine for hosting a religious belief systems.
That as this is empirically validated by geodesic eclipse, there is
nothing any body has to do beyond coercing the Sovereign to invalidate
by 'revoking, altering or amending' the Letters Patent, as shall seem
meet.
This paradigm of mind related to the permanent principle underlying
tem****al things, has in relation to the Logos as Infinity, a logical
grounding in chronology for which I observe the Sabbath. But as this
paradigm also provides the categories of understanding for the
tem****al and non-tem****al sphere which are equated with the Hebrew
language and any other language sustained by milisian ordinals, I
therefore do not subscribe to any religion which has a creed as a
human construct created as a semantical world of discourse--because it
is sub-ordinate to my own transcendent, metempirical and metaphyscial
philosophical and religious belief.
That the possessional discovery of Australia can be viewed in terms of
this historical context due to a failure of that Imperial / Religious
governance as encapsulated in the Gregorian Calendar Reforms of 1582
which were adopted by the British Empire much later in 1751/1752.
That this possessional discovery and claim of Australia as a continent
is made as a formula of progression associated with cosmological
advance related to the Astronomical Unit and a determination of the
topical year relating to the planet Earth and also Captain Cook's
usage of a flat board to advance map making...
http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/images/nous.gif
Captain James Cook (1728-1779 CE) made a voyage of 1768-1770 CE and
scientific expedition (inc. naturalist Joseph Banks and the astronomer
Charles Green) to observe the planet Venus transiting the Sun as
astronomical event at Tahiti--There are only two transits occurring
within 120 years and these fell on 1761 CE and 1769 CE and the issue
appears related to a consideration of determining longitude involving
Venus. The results obtained from Papeete (Tahiti--17=B0 32' S) were
compared to those of Vard=F6 (Lapland, Finland--70=B0 21' N), which are at
the same longitude as meridian. By the measuring the parallax of the
planet during a transit and by using the sun's face as the
prerequisite background, the timing of the transit then gives from
Kepler's third law, the ability to determine the (mean) distance
between the earth and the sun, which is known as the astronomical
unit.
After completing this task Cook opened a sealed envelop with the Royal
Navy's secret orders to seek out the fabled southern continent. Using
the work of early mapmakers and Dutch explorers such as Abel Tasman
who, departing Batavia (Jakarta, Indonesia), had sought the
op****tunity for immediate profits as return to the investors of the
sponsoring Dutch East Indies Company. Tasman had searched for the
southern continent in 1642 CE, mapped ****tions of it's southern most
island. Assigning to it the name Van Dieman's Land (Tasmania) and
claimed it for the Netherlands. And within 1644 CE mapped it's
northern and western shores, subscribing to his exploration of the
continent, the name New Holland--128 years later on 29 April 1770
Super: #372 / #3 - Prescriptions for Politics/ Keeping the People
Quiet; I-Ching: H46 - Moving Upward; Tetra: #8 - Opposition; Ego:
#346 / #58 - Political Reversal/ Adaptation to Change; I-Ching: H43 -
Resolution; Tetra: #29 - Decisiveness
[#18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts/ Palliation of Vulgarity, #11 -
Value of Non-Existence/ Function of the Non-Existent, #78 -
Recognizing Fidelity/ Trust in Faith, #58 - Political Reversal/
Adaptation to Change, #53 - Increasing Evidence/ Gaining Insight, #13
- Status/ Loathing Shame, #6 - Superiority of the Female/ Completion
of Form, #80 - Primitivist Independence/ Remaining in Isolation, #29 -
Deeming/ Non-Assertion]
at what became Kurnell in south Sydney, Cook overrode previous claims
made of this yet unrealised asset, by claiming Australia as a
possession for Britain.
However the topical year can also be understood by a Sabbath based
computation which provides a transcendent negation of the Gregorian
cycle of 400 years as the basis for replacement theology, which is as
146097 days evenly divisible by seven:
Given the date of Wednesday 20 March / 21 March =3D 1 Nisan is
historically understood in relation to the Torah's perspective of the
Hebrew letters as an articulation of the HRUMACHIS cycle {ie. this
name is implied by HORUS OF THE TWO HORIZONS as HARMAKHIS: "The Son of
man is Lord even of the Sabbath (which was made for man)." [Matthew
12:8; Mark 2:28; Luke 6:5; Luke 13:15]} which commences from the date
of the Equinox of Wednesday 20 March and constitutes the zero point
for the following base-7 chronology:
D =3D 364 x 6 or 2184 days, W =3D 6D x 7, J =3D 6D x 49 =3D 107016 days as
2=
94
years x 364 or 293 years x 365.2425
A variation of the 22/7 equation as rational PI computation which is
implicit within the 364 day cycle from the DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * 364)
+ 182 days =3D Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) as related to the 22nd Priestly
Course of GAMUL, gives the Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) as
commencing the Sabbath year and the reprise associated to the
following schema as a transcendent negation of the Gregorian cycle of
400 years as the basis for replacement theology, which is as 146097
days evenly divisible by seven:
#0 MOD 22 =3D 22 [#TAU / #400] as 4000 BCE
#400 MOD 22 =3D 17 [#PE / #80]
#800 MOD 22 =3D 12 [#LAMED / #30]
#1200 MOD 22 =3D 7 [#ZAYIN / #7]
#1600 MOD 22 =3D 2 [#BETH / #2]
#2000 MOD 22 =3D 19 [#QOPH / #100]
#2400 MOD 22 =3D 14 [#NUN / #50]
#2800 MOD 22 =3D 9 [#TETH / #9]
#3200 MOD 22 =3D 4 [#DALETH / #4]
#3600 MOD 22 =3D 21 [#****N / #300]
#4000 MOD 22 =3D 16 [#'AYIN / #70] =3D #0 CE as HETEROS autonomic
transformative prototype and symbolic associator to series #15, #34,
#65, #111, #175, #260, #369 ... #2000 Y2K
#4400 MOD 22 =3D 11 [#KAF / #20] =3D #400 CE
#4800 MOD 22 =3D 6 [#VAV / #6] =3D #800 CE
#5200 MOD 22 =3D 1 [#ALEPH / #1] =3D #1200 CE
#5600 MOD 22 =3D 18 [#TSADE / #90] =3D #1600 CE
#6000 MOD 22 =3D 13 [#MEM / #40] =3D #2000 Y2K / Equinox of
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * 364) + 182 days =3D Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12)
with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year
of 'oth cycle
#6400 MOD 22 =3D 8 [#CHET / #8]
#6800 MOD 22 =3D 3 [#GIMEL / #3]
#7200 MOD 22 =3D 20 [#RESH / #200]
#7600 MOD 22 =3D 15 [#SAMEK / #60]
#8000 MOD 22 =3D 10 [#YOD / #10]
#8400 MOD 22 =3D 5 [#HE / #5]
#8800 MOD 22 =3D 22 [#TAU / #400] as 8800 CE
That there exists a comprehension of autonomic principles of Nature
such as the seventh-day Sabbath keepers of the Everlasting Covenant
with its 'oth cycle of 1092 days from which it is deduced that 6J =3D
294 x 364 days or 293 x 365.2425 topical years as 107016 days:
D =3D 364 x 6 or 2184 days, W =3D 6D x 7, J =3D 6D x 49 =3D 107016 days as
2=
94
years x 364 or 293 years x 365.2425
22/7 as 3W1D ... {Formula of Progression of individual phenomena}
the major premise {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 x 13 =3D 2184 days of
the 'oth cycle =3D 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the 'constant sequence of
sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation =3D 1092 days x 2 =3D 2184
days
the minor premise {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 =3D 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March =3D 1 Nisan 5756; and
the conclusion {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), that is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 topical years as 122J3W1D + 9(9=B2
+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18
September =3D 1 Tishri 5762.
That the Queen as defender of the Judaeo-Christian (and Christian)
faith and in relation to that function adopted as the basis for
colonies established as 6 nomarchies must give regard to this
cosmological principle as being not only transcendent to the Gregorian
Calendar Reforms of 1582 and adopted by the British Act of Parliament
in 1751/1752.
That the GEODESIC Total eclipse of the sun as occurring in Australia
on 4 December 2002 with another 28 years later on about 25 November
2030 may be viewed as providing a formula of progression, which
invalidates the Sovereign's earlier claim over the continent as
established by Captian Cook's scientific endeavour associated to the
Astronomical mean.
Mr Wallace from the Australian Christian Lobby has argued that a
Charter of Rights threatens the autonomy of all religious
organisations and not just Christian ones.
However without a Charter of Rights which protects the Autonomic,
these same religious organisations are acting against the Regulative
Free Will of Democratic Civil and Decent societies as the autonomy of
will within the Commonwealth as responsive duty to state and the
ethical use of force as obligations placed upon Australians as
participants within that sovereign autonomous entity as conveyed by
Section 8 to the Letters Patent of the Australian Constitution of
1901.
That I have this Good Friday morning 21 March 2008 submitted a
statement of complaint by post to the New South Wales Anti-
Discrimination Board (as a more appropriate and responsive
jurisdiction to the Victorian Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights
Commission) with respect to a complaint made by 3rd parties as the
cause for the termination of my Internet access as "interference with
the operations of the service network, anyone else's enjoyment of
their service or which upsets or offends any person."
That this relates to my sending a telephone text message as request
made to two candidates claiming Christian Identity in the 24 November
2007 Federal Election. Whereby I sought to advise and caution them
with the following text message:
"How does the Australian Christian Lobby's ideological view of
marriage and homo***uality associated to aspirational obscurant
fideism as religious belief differ from the Natural Law view of
Hymeneal Values proscribing marriage and ***ual conduct for citizens
as ideology promulgated by the Concordat between the Papal Holy See &
The German Reich of 20 July 1933?
I have set up a www-page at http://home.mysoul.com.au/grapple/
[since
removed by me on 24 January 2008] which provides my answer.
I'd like to know when the Australian Christian Lobby is going to show
compliance with respect to their aspirations towards a more responsive
duty to State and ethical use of force as obligation of individual,
government and non-government organizational and military
accountability to the Commonwealth undertaken in accordance with
Section 8 of the Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution of 1901
and Treason as defined by Section 9A of the Crimes Act 6231/1958.
If the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON as statement on TIME {ie. Telos
[122J3W1D] =3D Arch [3W1D] + c=B2 [9(9=B2+1)/2]} is not central to the
rationality, reasoning psyche and wisdom of the human experience, then
you are simply having a self-infatuation as you grasp for your desire--
what ever superficiality and tem****al thing or values that may be.
If you can't answer the question then please refrain from violating my
Australian Constitutional Rights as an Indigenous Dutch Australian."
This do***ent of complaint has been composed by deploying category of
understanding #146 - STATEMENT OF COMPLAINT / THORN extracted from the
GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON as AUTONOMIC ENNEAD.
It ought to be self evident that as claim to religious belief it
invalidates claims to Judaeo-Christian and Christian religious belief
associated to marriage as dependency made of an autonomic
transformative prototype associated to religious mysticism, which is a
product of cosmological understanding that has historically been
associated with a HETEROS symbolic understanding of number.
That whilst section 56 (d) of the Anti-Discrimination Act of 1977
stipulates that "nothing in this Act affects any other act or practice
of a body established to propagate religion that conforms to the
doctrines of that religion or is necessary to avoid injury to the
religious susceptibilities of the adherents of that religion."
And this might be said to apply with respects to the August 2004
passage of the Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill as an Act to amend
the Commonwealth Marriage Act 1961 and Family Law Act 1975, with a
formal monogamous definition of gamogenesis as: "marriage means the
union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily
entered into for life".
Whilst there is on the one hand an issue of lack of separation of
Church and State with respect to the performance of marriage
ceremonies. That marriage, rather than being regarded as an act of
nature by copulation, is an autonomic transformative prototype
associated to religious mysticism, which is a product of cosmological
understanding that has historically been associated with a HETEROS
symbolic understanding of number--that this conflicts with Indigenous
Dutch Australian identity.
Is not the New South Wales Attorney-General John Hatzistergos
therefore required under Section 8 of the Letters Patent to the
Australian Constitution of 1901 to provide substantiation of the
Commonwealth's definition of marriage as claim to religious identity
and how this is differentiated from the Categorical Imperative of 1933
to 1945 as conveyed by the Concordat and those made by the Roman
Catholic Church.
Such lack of action renders the comments made by Hatzistergos that a
Bill of Rights is therefore antagonistic to the Sovereign and
Autonomic requirement under the Commonwealth--as unreasonable on his
part in the mistaken belief that marriage is an act of piety rather
than the State's licensing of immigrant feral fascist dogs.
On 7 May 2007 the Victorian Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights
Commission had decided--consistent with a 26 April 2001 decision to
decline to entertain my complaints relating to discrimination on the
grounds that my ***ual orientation is "in opposition to the beliefs,
goals and purposes and such views distracts from, and works against"
the American originating Seventh-day Adventist Church (Australian
Union Conference) Limited. On the grounds that "It would appear that
the exceptions in section 75 and 77 of the Act apply to your complaint
of ***ual orientation as the Church is of the belief that member****p
should be denied on the basis of homo***uality due to its beliefs and
principles."
The Church on 26 April 2006 following my ANZAC Day arrest the day
prior, and in response to my letter of enquiry dated 25 October 2005
following my return to the region of my birth-place after an absence
of 27 years, as considerations of an apology and despite an
accompanying statement of the merit and substantiation of my own
religious belief, will not allow me to become a member of the Seventh-
Day Adventist Church in Sale, because I am homo***ual and the Church
therefore assumes that on the basis of my HIV+, the grounds of refusal
as expressed within a determination by the Equal Op****tunity and Human
Rights Commission of 26 April 2001, remains valid.
The Commission in its reasoning said, "the Church considers
homo***uality is in opposition to its beliefs, goals and purposes and
such views distracts from, and works against, the Church's purposes of
promoting Jesus Christ and salvation. This does not appear to prevent
you from gaining fellow****p with the Church.
Please note that the Commission does not have the power to review its
decision to decline your complaints. Similarly, it cannot re-open a
file on the basis that there is a disagreement concerning the decision
it has made.
If you do not request referral the Commission may dismiss the
complaints and no further action may be taken in relation to the
subject matter of the complaints."
That under Section 77 of the Equal Op****tunity Act No 42/1995, the
Church is able to discriminate against another person "if the
discrimination is necessary for the first person to comply with the
person's genuine religious beliefs or principles." And that under
Section 75 of this same act, "nothing in Part 3 of the Act applies to
anything done by a body established for religious purposes that:
a) conforms with the doctrine of the religion; or
b) is necessary to avoid injury to the religious sensitivities of the
people of the religion."
This perspective is consistent with the views expressed at a lecture
by conservative Bill Muehlenberg on 'Ministry and Member****p' Proposal
84 considered at the Uniting Church in Australia 10th National
Assembly, 12 to 19 July 2003: "There are some issues in the church
which are not matters which we can decide according to our own likes
and dislikes. [The issue of homo***uality as defined and explained
carefully, will be seen to belong to this category] The acceptance of
certain doctrines defines who is and who is not a Christian. If we
deny these doctrines we forfeit the privilege of calling ourselves
Christian."
That under the auspices of section 108(2) of the Equal Op****tunity Act
I had in writing, by letter dated Saturday 16 June 2007 [Super: #333 /
#78 - Recognizing Fidelity/ Trust in Faith; I-Ching: H59 - Dispersal;
Tetra: #47 - Pattern; Ego: #414 / #78 - Recognizing Fidelity/ Trust in
Faith; I-Ching: H59 - Dispersal; Tetra: #47 - Pattern], and within 60
days of receiving the notice declining to entertain the complaint
under Section 108(1) of the Equal Op****tunity Act 1995 on 11 May 2007,
required the Commission to refer the complaints to the Victorian Civil
and Administrative Tribunal, Anti-Discrimination List for hearing.
Furthermore I expressed the view that the claim advanced by the
Seventh-day Adventist Church in relation to my member****p application
being refused due to "***ual orientation being a factor" and
"submitting that my position on homo***uality will divert members from
the purpose and goal of the church" as grounds for exemption under
Section 75(2)(b) of the Equal Op****tunity and Human Rights Act
42/1995, ought in the instance, differentiate such sensitivities as
the religious values of a people of religion from the underlying
philosophical mechanism, which gave rise to the hymeneal principle of
morals as heteronomy against autonomy, that were the Categorical
Imperatives of German Fascism of 1933 to 1945.
In this do***ent I have conveyed that in relation to Section 77 of the
Victorian Equal Op****tunity Act No 42/1995, it enables a Church to
discriminate against another person "if the discrimination is
necessary for the first person to comply with the person's genuine
religious beliefs or principles."
That the adoption of a Charter of Rights which grants the State's
recognition to same *** marriages is made precisely on the basis that
the cosmological and empirical valid basis as justification for
Australia's transition from a Constitutional Monarchy to a Republic is
equally applicable to the justification of autonomic based religious
belief.
That there remains no genuine basis to institutional religious belief
which is reliant entirely on a hymenealism (marriage) as aspirational
obscurant fideism. And the Equal Oppurtunity and Human Rights
Commission has been complicit in its systematic denial of justice over
the past 21 years of maintaining a culture of religious motivated
racial and ***ual vilification, which by the absence of means to give
substantiation of such irrational religious belief as aspirational
obscurant fideism, amounts to Treason against the autonomic right
under the Commonwealth.
- dolf
http://www.grapple.id.au
|
