"Libertarius" <Libertarius@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:46d359bf$0$26114$88260bb3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linda Lee wrote:
>
>> On Aug 26, 8:31 am, "Ha SATAN [Sin Tet Nun]"
>> <hasa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>Linda Lee wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Aug 23, 9:20 pm, "Suzanne" <****l...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Ha SATAN [Sin Tet Nun]" <hasa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>messagenews:1187890715.445414.75570@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>>>>Libertarius napisal(a):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>===>It is definitely not "wrong", just unknown and
>>>>>>>>>unacceptable to fundamentalist bible wore****pers. -- L.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>===>One should spell "Holy Bible" with captals,
>>>>>>>but "bible" is just a word.
>>>
>>>>>>>But Christians don't
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>wor****p the Bible, they wor****p the one that
>>>>>>>>taught us to read and study God's word.
>>>
>>>>>>>===>By accepting the BIG LIE that it is "God's word",
>>>>>>>you become a "bible wor****per".
>>>>>>>By declaring it "inerrant", you become a "bible wor****per". -- L.
>>>
>>>>>>Nominal "Bible Wor****pers" perhaps,
>>>>>>but most of them do not seem to know much about what their Bible
says
>>>>>>concerning their ideologies.
>>>
>>>>>>as for me i have never stopped enjoying studying this "Bible" -- it
>>>>>>reveals mountains of information.
>>>
>>>>>>None of it pointing to a 'deity' however.
>>>
>>>>>Since the Bible has a lot to say about God,
>>>>>why would you say this last statement?
>>>
>>>>>Suzanne- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>>>>- Show quoted text -
>>>
>>>>Because he's spiritually blind, Suzanne. Oh, I guess that was a
>>>>rhetorical question, wasn't it?
>>>
>>>LOL, well in your world i suppose that is true ; i cannot see what you
>>>wish for me to see in "The Bible".
>>>
>>>i suppose your God does not want me to see such things ?
>>
>>
>> The Hebrews do not want us to see such things because they have
>> rejected the Messiah prophesied in their scriptures.
>
> ===>No such prophecies exist.
> Christ is the invention of Christians.
>
> If you would be
>> objective, you certainly have the intelligence to see that their
>> negation of prophecies of 'the Son' has serious flaws.
>
> ===>If you had any intelligence, you would THINK,
> rather than believe.
>>
>>
>>>so whose 'fault' is that ?
>>
>>
>> Paul's - not God's. Yeshua` incarnated and told us the truth i.e. that
>> the Hebrew Scriptures had testified of HIM.
>
> ===>FALSE!
> "IESOUS" was invented by the Church and its scribes.
> THEY are the ones who "told" those things.
>
> Then Paul comes along and
>> obscures the truth. Of course, I see it as Satan working through the
>> murderous Paul who opened himself up to satanic influence through his
>> murderous behaviour.
>>
>>
>>>i tried to see "The Bible" as a model of reality for many many years.
>>>
>>>What do you recommend ?- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>>- Show quoted text -
>>
>>
>> I recommend 'Christianity' minus Paul's twist on it and minus Paul's
>> influence on Luke/Acts.
>
> ===>Ridiculous.
> "Paul" was also invented by the Church, and "LUKE-ACTS" created to
> justify his existence.
> Christianity is what they decided "Paul" said. -- L.
>
You are really in the dark.
>
Suzanne
|
