"Linda Lee" <lindagirl444@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1187929322.760846.247680@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Aug 23, 9:20 pm, "Suzanne" <****l...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Ha SATAN [Sin Tet Nun]" <hasa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> messagenews:1187890715.445414.75570@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> > Libertarius napisal(a):
>> >> >>===>It is definitely not "wrong", just unknown and
>> >> >>unacceptable to fundamentalist bible wore****pers. -- L.
>> >> ===>One should spell "Holy Bible" with captals,
>> >> but "bible" is just a word.
>>
>> >> But Christians don't
>> >> > wor****p the Bible, they wor****p the one that
>> >> > taught us to read and study God's word.
>>
>> >> ===>By accepting the BIG LIE that it is "God's word",
>> >> you become a "bible wor****per".
>> >> By declaring it "inerrant", you become a "bible wor****per". -- L.
>>
>> > Nominal "Bible Wor****pers" perhaps,
>> > but most of them do not seem to know much about what their Bible says
>> > concerning their ideologies.
>>
>> > as for me i have never stopped enjoying studying this "Bible" -- it
>> > reveals mountains of information.
>>
>> > None of it pointing to a 'deity' however.
>>
>> Since the Bible has a lot to say about God,
>> why would you say this last statement?
>>
>> Suzanne- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Because he's spiritually blind, Suzanne. Oh, I guess that was a
> rhetorical question, wasn't it?
>
Actually, I offered him a chance to explain
why he was making two such incongruent
statements. I can see the possiblities of
what he may have been intending, if he
was trying to on purpose be facetious, and
just pull someone's chain.
>
Suzanne
|
