Libertarius skrev:
> Ha SATAN [Sin Tet Nun] wrote:
>
> > Libertarius skrev:
> >
> >>Ha SATAN [Sin Tet Nun] wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Libertarius skrev:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>===>Suzanne, you live in ignorant delusion.
> >>>>When will you grow up, if ever?
> >>>>
> >>>>It is just a CLAIM that the book was a
> >>>>"revelation" from "Jesus Christ".
> >>>>
> >>>>There never existed a person named "Jesus Christ".
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>in which sense do you mean ? do you claim there was never a
character
> >>>who "followed the script" of zekaryah and attempted to effect divine
> >>>intervention and restore the kingso [of yisrael or yehud is another
> >>>inquiry] ..?
> >>>in 6 CE we see a very similar character -- a do***ented incident --
> >>>yochan of "Galilee"
> >>
> >>===>The "Jesus" character of the NT is a composite figure,
> >>largely based on JUDAS THE GALILEAN, with a bunch of details
> >>adapted from the TA****H.
> >
> >
> >
> > one question would be, why place his birth under Quirinius ?
>
> ===>The writers confused Judas/"Jesus" with his son James
> who is presented as the "brother" of "Jesus".
> James could have been born at the time of the tax revolution
> of Judas the Galilean.
> BTW, John the Baptizer was the co-founder of the Zealot movement
> with JoG, presented as "Zadok" in some of the works of Flavius
> Josephus. James may have been one of the disciples he baptized.
This again appears to be another hole in my knowledge -- and would
indictae a gaping hole of ignorance if what you describe has
sufficient sup****t in th text.
i [till now] assumed `yaqov` to be the borther of `yeshua`.
you now propose that he is the son of yochan.
please go on.
>> SARMATIANS
if such is of any interest,
the "Sarmatian" boundary closely corresonds to the Satem-Centum [or
Centum-Stame rather] "isogloss"
Like the misnomer or misleading encapsulation "Pharsi" empire,
the Sarmatian territory -- vast as you know-- was an AMALGAM of
disparate races.
i have traced the semiotics of one of these races to the aristocracy
of one of the nations of central europe.
Irrelevant here except to say,
notice how LATE the Slavs appear on the geopolitical map of western
history.
|
