I believe this was written by some sort of program that combines random
phrases to seem to make some sort of sense.
I delete junk that is cross posted. So I will delete this. Unfortunately
that also deletes, (at least the way I do it) the sender.
"Michael" <newsuser@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:IuPFa.954828$Zo.217007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:44:56 -0600, We knew we were right, before we
were
> wronged. wrote:
>
>
> > Standing Ground
> >
> > What was Saddam doing that we could have fought for betterment
by
> > simply communicating over those who couldn't care less as
> > criminals?
>
>
> I didn't get very far on this one. Maybe I'm just too tired to try to
> parse this awful grammar. In fact, I had no idea just how big the post
> was until I had to delete 99 percent of it just to keep the example
> sentence.
>
> If the author would be so kind to condense it to a couple of 5 sentence
> paragraphs I might even read it.
>
> 1. What was Saddam doing? We don't know. We know SOME of what he was
> doing, and it was pretty bad stuff. Now, we know a lot more about what
> he has been doing, and it is pretty bad stuff. Had S.H. kept his bad
> stuff at home he'd very likely still be doing it.
>
> 2. "We could have fought for betterment." What is that? I think we
did
> fight for betterment, actually.
>
> 3. "Simply communicating over those who couldn't care less as
criminals."
> What is that? Fighting for betterment cannot be done by simply
> communicating over criminals or whatever you mean.
>
> Sincerely,
> Michael
>
> (If you write better, I read better!)
|
