Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Louis Nick > Re: Instant rev...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 66 of 82
Post > Topic >>

Re: Instant review: Maryland's new electronic voting machines

by Louis Nick III <sunburn@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 26, 2004 at 11:08 AM

In alt.religion.kibology, dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> Bill Shymanski <wtshyman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >All the stuff I've been reading in comp.risks makes me wonder why
> >American elections need such gratuitious gadgetry.  Is there some
reason
> >why American elections are more complicated or is it just more of the
> >spirit that brought us such innovations as the zipper and the wind-up
> >musical backscratcher?
> 
> The Republicans, currently In Control of stuff, want to remain in
control,
> and don't want any nassssty paper trails to make people doubt that yes
of
> COURSE they won all those elections handily. That's my take on it. The
> Republicans of course own the company (just one, as I understand it)
that
> makes said electronic voting machines...

Yeeaaagh, Dave, Make it stop!  From everything I've seen, the drive to 
get these machines up and going, to avoid the overt appearance of a 
Florida 2000, is a bipartisan effort.  (Nevermind the covert Florida 
2000s that will, indeed, be happening all over.)  Besides, as it turns 
out, when I joined the Bogeyman-de-jour Party, a.k.a. the GOP, I was not 
immediately issued stock in the company that makes electronic voting 
machines, any more than L. Ron Hubbard owns Earthlink from beyond the 
grave (though perhaps he does if he's infesting the psyche of some poor 
alien race on a future Earth, but that may be beside the point).

The fact is that these elections will be challenged in the courts 
constantly until either a paper-trail is produced or aliens burn the 
planet into a cinder, a cinder that stops lawyers.  But as suggested 
elsewhere in this thread, it seems more reasonable that Diebold et al. 
has found a market niche populated by paranoid election officials who 
either don't look as good as or don't like the party of Catherine 
Harris, and so they don't want another ballot fiasco, the center star of 
which turned out to be pieces of paper.  Instead of training their poll 
employees to clean out the damn punch machines in the first place, 
they've decided to overshoot the mark and go for an idiot-proof system, 
disregarding or getting overridden when it comes to the fact that it's 
decidedly not immune to non-idiots.  (Idiots may apply.)

-LAN3
Card-carrying non-idiot.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Instant review: Maryland's new electronic voting machines
Louis Nick III <sunbur  2004-01-26 11:08:00 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Wed Jul 23 20:15:09 CDT 2008.