On May 21, 9:04=A0pm, d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(David DeLaney) wrote:
> Doctroid <doctr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(David DeLaney) wrote:
> >>Look up Avogadro's number, Skewes' number, and G\"odel numbers; second
o=
f arc,
> >>Planck length, and h-bar...
>
> >Avogadro's number, the Planck length, and h bar are each equal to 1, in
> >appropriate units.
>
> Yep. Wait, nope; how are you getting Avogadro's number, a pure number,
to =
be 1?
> (Its definition involves units, but measuring it doesn't.)
>
> >All numbers are G\"odel numbers, so that/they does/do not count as
> >special constants.
>
> Most numbers don't come out as sensible G\"odel numbers though; they've
go=
t
> zeroes in too many places when decoded. Of course, if your numbering
syste=
m
> for your nomenclature assigns something to zero, then they'll likely
> have that symbol in too many places.
>
> >Skewes' numbers, plural, according to Wikipedia, are not special
> >constants but upper limits on a special constant.
>
> But that makes them special in themselves; they are the lowest upper
limit=
s
> on it that were first proven. Plus he did it with AND without the
Riemann
> hypothesis!
>
> >Who are you and what have you done with the real David DeLaney?
>
> TREMBLE, MORTAL FOOLZ, AS I INCREASE YOUR NUMERACY BEYOND ALL REASONABLE
> BOUNDS BY MAKING U LOOK STUFF UP!
>
> Dave "unless your interest is less than epsilon" DeLaney
> --
> \/David DeLaney posting from d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It's not the pot that =A0 =A0
=
=A0 =A0grows the flower
> It's not the clock that slows the hour =A0The definition's plain for
anyon=
e to see
> Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE =A0 =A0 =A0
=A0HAP=
PYNET VRbeable<BLINK>http://www.vic.com/~dbd/-
net.legends FAQ & Magic / I
W=
UV you in all CAPS! --K.
OMG, I'm so embarrassed.
I thought his number (mole?) was 6.02 X 10 to the negative 23.
I don't see any negative on teh Internet. :/
|
