On May 12, 3:14=A0pm, tho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> NB <nobuy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> >> Pluto wrote:
> >>> NB wrote:
> >>>>>>>> This is more proof that Tholen is a troll, given that only a
trol=
l
> >>>>>>>> would set the X-No-Archive header to Yes.
> >>>>>>> The imposter is a troll, nobuyout. =A0Still having trouble
recogni=
zing
> >>>>>>> the imposter, nobuyout?
> >>>>>> It is unlikely that it was an imposter, Tholen,
> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
> >>>>>> given that they used
> >>>>>> the same newsreader as you, the same ISP, and posted from Hawaii.
> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
> >>>>> Still suffering from
> >>>>> reading comprehension problems, nobuyout?
> >>>> No, but you are, Tholen, as shown in my next comment.
> >>>>> The Message-ID isn't from
> >>>>> "the same ISP", nobuyout:
> >>>>> Message-ID: <99bfded4dccbba010dcb10c966986...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>> Irrelevant, given that the Organization and X-NNTP-Posting-Host are
> >>>> from the same ISP and IP address, Tholen.
> >>> It may or may not have been posted by somebody using the same ISP,
but=
if they
> >>> were using the same ESP, the message ID would have been different.
=A0=
Dizum allows
> >>> you to specify the headers - I think the only ones you can't specify
a=
re path
> >>> and the abuse address.
> >> What you think is irrelevant, Pluto.
> > No more irrelevant than your thoughts, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition. =A0
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
>
> >>> They do have a policy against forging a user's email,
> >>> but I'm not sure what they would say about forging a fake email.
> >> What does that have to do with college basketball, Pluto?
> > The same thing that all of your irrelevant comments have to do with
> > college basketball, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition. =A0
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
>
> >>> It was a funny
> >>> post, but I don't think many people were actually fooled.
> >> What you think is irrelevant, Pluto.
> > What does that have to do with college basketball, Tholen?
>
> You should know, nobuyout, given that you made your claim about the
> header in a college basketball newsgroup.
So then why did you ask Pluto that question, Tholen, given that you
can apply the same logic to his question?
>
> >> What is relevant is that nobuyout
> >> was fooled, and is still fooled.
> > Classic erroneous presupposition, given that I never indicated that I
> > was fooled.
>
> Which means that you're either still fooled, nobuyout, or unwilling to
> admit that you were fooled.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, given that you still have
not proven that there was anything to be fooled about, Tholen.
>
> >> He thinks the X-NNTP-Posting-Host was
> >> provided by the ISP.
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from nobuyout.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
> =A0The
> substantiation for what you think is above, nobuyout.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
|
