Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Jehovahs Witness > Re: The Bible V...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 472 of 815 Topic 17485 of 18057
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Bible Versus Evolution

by Dave Oldridge <doldridg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 16, 2008 at 03:48 AM

"adman" <72545@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:ghFWj.31478$7a.6705@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> 
> "Dave Oldridge" <doldridg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:Xns9A9E48EEB6526doldridgsprintca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>| "adman" <72545@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:Bd8Wj.6162$Xv3.1736
>| @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>|
>| > Moloch did not ordered death. Moloch is a nonexistent piece of wood
>| > you fool. There is only one God that sits in judgment and can order
>| > death. 
>| >
>| >
>|
>| Once again you demonstrate your utter abject ignorance of the
>| spiritual matters you pretend to know something about.
>|
>| While the Ammonites no doubt made statues of their false god, it was
>| not the statues that they wor****ped.  It was the false god -- the
>| evil spirit the statues represented.
>|
>| Moloch, the evil spirit that represents itself to people as God, and
>| then demands human sacrifices, is one of Satan's chief lieutenants. 
>| He is 
> alive
>| and well, and has many devotees in the world today, some of them
>| claiming to be Christian, some claiming to be Muslim, some claiming
>| to be of other faiths, some even claiming to be atheists.
> 
> 
> Moloch is a piece if wood. All the other false gods and man made gods
> do not exist. There is no boogie man called the devil, and Satan,(as
> you call him), and the others are imprisoned. What you see, all the
> evilness and misery in this world today, right down to worms, fleas,
> and parasites, were left behind as a result of the corruption,
> influence and bad seed of the watchers. This once perfect creation
> corrupted beyond our comprehension. The true fallen ones that
> descended to Mount Hermon and introduced their bad seed, their bad
> habits, their war, their death, their disease, their sickness and
> their hatred into the human race will be punished, along with you. You
> can count on it. 
> 
> The Flood did not get all of the fallen one's children known as
> nephelium and the one's that survived consorted with members of the
> tribes of Israel throughout canna, mixing their seed back into the
> human genome once again.You are a product of that seed obviously.
> Israel was warned not to consort with the peoples of canna but did not
> listen and they paid the price for their stubbornness during the
> Judges period. 
> 
> The first time it happened, God judged the world with water. The next
> time, it will be by fire and this creation WILL be restored. You have
> no authority to stop it, nor do you have any power to change that
> fact. You can shout mankind's origination is from "evolution" until
> you are blue in the face, and that will not make evolution fact. Your
> science's evolution is not observable and your big bang theory is not
> provable using your own laws of physics.Face facts. The creation of
> this universe and everything in it is WAY beyond your man made science
> to understand much less comprehend. 
> 
> it is really..... THAT simple.

And you know all this because your pet devil told you, right?

Threats of punishment by your nonexistent false god do not frighten us.  
You neither know nor have the authority to speak for El Shaddai.

Who makes up these stories for your cult, an itinerant demon?  I mean, 
they contain words out of the Bible, but these stories are not IN the 
Bible.  Therefore, you must be deriving them from some nonbiblical 
source.

Which would be fine, if the source were an authentic prophet.  But what 
you are, sir, is a stupid, totally inadequate, but very pretentious 
mountebank.  In short, you're a phony.

Check out what the book you claim to follow says will happen to you in 
the end -- false prophet!





-- 
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
 




 815 Posts in Topic:
Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Randall Witkowski <Ran  2008-03-24 22:07:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Painter"   2008-03-24 22:18:17 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism = Randall Witkowski = JA
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-24 17:26:58 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 15:30:46 
Flaws in =?windows-1252?Q?=93Scientific_Creationism=94?=
Randall Witkowski <Ran  2008-03-24 22:36:46 
Re: Flaws in “Scientific Creationism”
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-24 19:09:05 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 16:40:21 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 21:07:43 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
Michael Gray <mikegray  2008-03-26 12:08:31 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 02:13:19 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-25 22:15:46 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-25 22:14:29 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-28 08:33:51 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-30 07:48:18 
Re: Flaws in “Scientific Creationism”
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-03-24 19:10:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Randall Witkowski <Ran  2008-03-24 22:38:31 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Robibnikoff" &  2008-03-24 18:46:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 15:55:00 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-03-25 00:05:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 16:37:15 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-03-25 00:43:15 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 17:04:30 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Chicken Little Jr <chi  2008-03-24 22:07:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-24 19:27:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-24 22:33:16 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 20:11:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Uncle Vic <address@[EM  2008-03-25 04:16:02 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 21:42:20 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-25 12:08:47 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Painter"   2008-03-25 05:11:48 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-25 12:38:00 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-25 03:25:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@[EM  2008-03-25 13:59:08 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Uncle Vic <address@[EM  2008-03-27 03:48:06 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Johannson"  2008-03-25 13:33:19 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 14:57:55 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-25 18:22:05 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-25 22:24:23 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 05:29:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 05:39:32 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 05:49:47 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 06:19:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 06:28:21 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 06:43:10 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 06:46:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 07:02:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Uncle Vic <address@[EM  2008-03-27 03:44:31 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 23:57:31 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"adman" <725  2008-03-27 08:30:43 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-24 23:02:11 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Robibnikoff" &  2008-03-24 19:06:52 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 16:32:14 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-25 03:09:02 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 21:37:04 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-25 23:09:55 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 16:43:28 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-27 00:42:02 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 18:16:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-28 00:10:24 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:04:59 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-24 20:15:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:27:14 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-24 21:16:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
SeppoP <seppo_pietikai  2008-03-25 10:09:31 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 09:52:38 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 05:45:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 06:23:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 06:34:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 06:55:01 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 18:37:42 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 16:54:58 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 20:07:05 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 18:12:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 18:37:07 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 16:55:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 20:09:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"adman" <725  2008-03-25 20:22:14 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 20:29:57 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 21:29:29 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 22:06:29 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 22:28:26 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 23:19:51 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 01:57:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-25 22:44:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 08:06:06 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-25 22:41:53 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-25 22:40:47 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-27 00:47:16 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 18:36:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 02:00:30 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 21:53:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 09:33:36 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 18:06:04 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:05:22 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 08:19:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 09:42:26 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 19:01:36 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 16:48:21 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 21:11:20 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 14:31:57 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 17:51:02 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 15:00:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 18:07:11 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 15:27:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"M.M. Martinson"  2008-03-26 15:11:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 18:04:51 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:04:16 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 20:18:25 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:37:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 20:58:09 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 09:23:44 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-27 20:56:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
FeezeSpray <cold@[EMAI  2008-03-27 23:39:41 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-27 22:19:14 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-27 20:54:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-27 14:32:19 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-28 00:25:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-28 12:50:28 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Basilik359 <red@[EMAIL  2008-03-28 21:26:09 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism - "Basilik359" another J
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-28 17:34:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-28 17:36:20 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 18:42:00 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 20:58:43 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-26 23:16:17 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-25 22:37:40 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-25 22:33:48 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Robibnikoff" &  2008-03-25 05:20:52 
Re: Evolution, JABBERS SLAPPED DOWN BY ANOTHER WOMAN!!!!!!!!!!
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-25 22:48:53 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 16:13:30 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-25 13:30:24 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 21:53:03 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-24 22:05:06 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 09:49:29 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"adman" <725  2008-03-24 20:12:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-24 21:36:34 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Robibnikoff" &  2008-03-25 05:19:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 16:01:30 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 22:14:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 23:21:25 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Johannson"  2008-03-25 22:52:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-26 06:52:08 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-25 22:26:42 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-03-25 00:13:44 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:10:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-03-25 09:46:20 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-25 22:54:36 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-26 03:46:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 15:24:43 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 08:21:45 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 15:28:24 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 13:47:36 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 16:20:26 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Trigger <scope@[EMAIL   2008-03-26 21:38:22 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (JABBERS slapped down ag
"Kathy C" <K  2008-03-26 19:42:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (JABBERS slapped down ag
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:31:55 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (JABBERS slapped down ag
"Kathy C" <K  2008-03-26 23:22:32 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 18:56:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Virgil <Virgil@[EMAIL   2008-03-24 17:25:22 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:12:03 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Painter"   2008-03-25 01:25:19 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:29:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-24 21:42:09 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 18:57:23 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 22:16:57 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 23:26:07 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 01:58:46 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 08:23:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 09:43:23 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 19:08:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 15:35:41 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 21:07:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 21:15:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (Jabbers slapped down ag
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 19:46:06 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (Jabbers slapped down ag
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:32:29 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (Jabbers slapped down ag
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 23:25:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-27 00:48:18 
The Bible Versus Evolution
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 21:20:16 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution Jabbers slapped down hard by wom
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-26 19:51:28 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution Jabbers slapped down hard by wom
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:33:32 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-26 23:07:37 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Libertarius <Libertari  2008-03-27 10:53:24 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-27 18:29:40 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Pastor Dave <ananias91  2008-03-27 21:11:03 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-28 17:40:55 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Pastor Dave <ananias91  2008-03-28 23:14:59 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"adman" <725  2008-03-29 20:49:57 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Jabriol" <A  2008-03-29 23:37:12 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-29 23:54:42 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
Pastor Dave <ananias91  2008-03-30 14:21:48 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 13:28:37 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
"Mike Painter"   2008-03-30 12:55:53 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
"David V." <  2008-03-30 20:50:07 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Mike Johannson"  2008-03-30 00:16:10 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 01:46:18 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 05:35:46 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-28 18:01:18 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-28 17:50:30 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 23:23:15 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-03-29 20:14:36 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Ips-switch <carolyngul  2008-03-29 21:51:11 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-29 20:13:17 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 19:26:56 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"adman" <725  2008-03-29 20:51:21 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 21:07:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 00:35:28 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Libertarius <Libertari  2008-03-28 19:02:15 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-03-30 17:00:13 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-03-28 11:26:53 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 01:49:13 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 05:37:05 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"adman" <725  2008-03-28 08:59:55 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-28 18:11:46 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Ron Dean" <  2008-03-29 06:38:24 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-29 10:58:07 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"adman" <725  2008-03-29 20:52:16 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 00:45:44 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-29 16:25:11 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-03-29 16:51:18 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-29 20:13:17 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 19:28:07 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-04-01 19:28:11 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-01 18:31:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-05 20:29:21 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-30 00:50:20 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-30 09:59:03 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-30 17:55:01 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-30 17:57:21 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-28 18:08:54 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 23:23:15 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-29 11:22:10 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-29 16:25:11 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 00:59:28 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-30 09:59:03 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 18:07:50 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-30 20:24:15 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 20:23:54 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-05 20:01:32 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-04-08 17:23:48 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-08 21:57:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-08 22:47:16 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-09 13:01:51 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-09 18:57:20 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-09 18:25:35 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 00:42:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-09 21:18:34 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 01:33:13 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-10 05:57:34 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 13:37:19 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-04-10 17:17:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-25 16:11:58 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-25 17:19:30 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Cory Albrecht <coryalb  2008-04-25 22:51:18 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Dave Oldridge <doldrid  2008-04-26 03:37:43 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-26 09:58:58 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-26 10:31:23 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Cory Albrecht <coryalb  2008-04-26 11:47:38 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-29 23:08:46 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-26 00:51:37 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-04-12 20:11:25 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-07 13:35:30 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Ron Dean" <  2008-03-28 12:43:25 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 13:16:21 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-28 18:24:10 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 20:42:04 
Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be acc
Rhino <blue@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-29 02:15:48 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 22:22:47 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 10:39:55 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-29 00:01:00 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 11:24:42 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 23:22:39 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 12:04:01 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 00:11:19 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 12:52:37 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Michael Gray <mikegray  2008-03-29 19:44:59 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 17:03:53 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 08:52:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-30 08:26:38 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 21:05:40 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-30 10:04:09 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 00:07:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-30 12:57:08 
Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would i
Ye Old One <usenet@[EM  2008-03-30 14:38:17 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-30 11:39:56 
Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would i
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 14:11:31 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 13:24:05 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 16:08:18 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 15:25:19 
Re: Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--wou
Ye Old One <usenet@[EM  2008-03-30 19:45:47 
Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would i
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-30 18:31:27 
Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would i
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-31 11:17:50 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 13:14:23 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 15:57:33 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-31 09:27:12 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-30 03:36:03 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-03-30 07:59:33 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-30 18:14:12 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Fulcrum <Me@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-30 23:17:25 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-30 20:04:08 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-03-30 20:17:04 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Killiam <killiam@[EMAI  2008-03-31 00:31:47 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 20:26:57 
NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible: her
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-31 09:22:09 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
"M.M. Martinson"  2008-03-30 21:48:36 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
Precision <"carol  2008-03-31 09:31:23 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-31 11:04:26 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
Precision <"carol  2008-03-31 09:29:11 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 12:45:11 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 08:00:44 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-04-01 21:38:23 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-02 09:15:17 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Disrupt <cutnpieces@[E  2008-04-02 09:45:13 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-04-01 19:38:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: TROLL ALERT: "Fulcrum = Jabriol"
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 19:47:53 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: TROLL ALERT: "Fulcrum = Jabriol"
Budikka666 <budikka1@[  2008-03-31 00:53:23 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: TROLL ALERT: ""Budikka666" = Jab
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 20:28:48 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 21:46:33 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-03-30 07:48:05 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 15:44:42 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 14:58:57 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 20:37:34 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 19:51:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Budikka666 <budikka1@[  2008-03-31 00:55:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
SeppoP <seppo_pietikai  2008-03-31 11:42:41 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"adman" <725  2008-03-31 05:57:05 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-31 11:17:31 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-30 18:15:26 
All these Carolyn Gulley Sock puppet Plonk them all!!!!!!
Precision <"carol  2008-03-31 01:19:10 
Re: All these Antonio L Santana Sock puppets Plonk them all!!!!!
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 21:52:15 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 21:22:37 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-30 19:35:47 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 21:21:22 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-30 18:35:58 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 21:23:16 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-31 10:53:38 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 13:10:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 07:21:18 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 23:23:14 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 11:03:53 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 00:53:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 12:09:51 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 15:08:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 14:13:36 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-02 06:38:07 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"John \"C\"  2008-04-01 19:20:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 21:52:01 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-02 09:49:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 23:05:38 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-02 10:35:59 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-02 14:38:19 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-03 08:23:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-04-02 18:50:22 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-03 10:16:15 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-04-03 01:26:19 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-03 17:07:06 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-04-03 18:03:26 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-03 22:18:21 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-04 06:27:59 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-04-03 18:14:01 
Re: