Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Jehovahs Witness > Re: The Bible V...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 461 of 815 Topic 17485 of 18057
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Bible Versus Evolution ..

by LewDcryzÝ <antant@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 13, 2008 at 04:48 PM

> On Mon, 12 May 2008 22:54:45 -0500, Free Lunch <lunch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 22:50:01 -0500, "adman" <72545@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>>> Moloch did not ordered death. Moloch is a nonexistent piece of wood
you 
>>> fool. There is only one God that sits in judgment and can order death.
>> 
>> Please provide evidence to sup****t those claims.
>> 
>>> The destruction of anyone living throughout the land of Canaan was 
>>> necessary 
>>> because they were so corrupt that they deserved death. They were not
only 
>>> corrupt, they ex****ted to their horrendous crimes. Their deaths were 
>>> ordered 
>>> by YHVH. Every man, woman, child, goat, chicken and pig except for the

>>> Virgin women. Why do you defend a people that were so corrupt as to
take 
>>> their children and burn their children to a nonexistent God? Why do
you 
>>> claim YHVH shed innocent blood? The corruption had to end. The only
way 
>>> for 
>>> the corruption to end was to wipe it out. Sadly innocent lives were
lost.
>> 
>> That's the story now. There is no evidence to sup****t any of those
>> claims. It's just an excuse to carry out a massive murder campaign. If
>> it had happened, it would be pure evil, but like many stories in the
Old
>> Testament, it's made up.
>> 
>>> But you lose focus. Keturah had a grudge and she carried that grudge
to 
>>> mount horeb. So did Ishmael's mother. Had both of these slave women 
>>> accepted 
>>> the one true God things may have turned out differently. But your
father, 
>>> the evil one, seized this op****tunity to corrupt Abraham's offspring
and 
>>> turn them against themselves. Brother against brother.
>> 
>> Again, you make assertions that you cannot back up with evidence. When
>> people criticize your erroneous claims, you become angry and attack,
you
>> never back up your claims. Apparently you know that your claims are
>> invalid, but then, why do you teach such lies?
>> 
>> ...
> 
> You poor deluded fool.

And those that beLIEve in rape and ***** to give them a savior then
revere a 
bloodied human being strung up for eternity is not deluded? rofl...moron.

> Always remember: Christ loves you, and so do I! Each and every one of
you

-- 
I masturbate with 'em there so I don't have to masturbate at 'em at home

              - Noah Bush; Black Sheep Bush Family Gay Pedo




























































** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**
 




 815 Posts in Topic:
Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Randall Witkowski <Ran  2008-03-24 22:07:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Painter"   2008-03-24 22:18:17 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism = Randall Witkowski = JA
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-24 17:26:58 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 15:30:46 
Flaws in =?windows-1252?Q?=93Scientific_Creationism=94?=
Randall Witkowski <Ran  2008-03-24 22:36:46 
Re: Flaws in “Scientific Creationism”
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-24 19:09:05 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 16:40:21 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 21:07:43 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
Michael Gray <mikegray  2008-03-26 12:08:31 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 02:13:19 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-25 22:15:46 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-25 22:14:29 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-28 08:33:51 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-30 07:48:18 
Re: Flaws in “Scientific Creationism”
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-03-24 19:10:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Randall Witkowski <Ran  2008-03-24 22:38:31 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Robibnikoff" &  2008-03-24 18:46:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 15:55:00 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-03-25 00:05:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 16:37:15 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-03-25 00:43:15 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 17:04:30 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Chicken Little Jr <chi  2008-03-24 22:07:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-24 19:27:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-24 22:33:16 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 20:11:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Uncle Vic <address@[EM  2008-03-25 04:16:02 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 21:42:20 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-25 12:08:47 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Painter"   2008-03-25 05:11:48 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-25 12:38:00 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-25 03:25:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@[EM  2008-03-25 13:59:08 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Uncle Vic <address@[EM  2008-03-27 03:48:06 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Johannson"  2008-03-25 13:33:19 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 14:57:55 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-25 18:22:05 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-25 22:24:23 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 05:29:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 05:39:32 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 05:49:47 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 06:19:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 06:28:21 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 06:43:10 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 06:46:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 07:02:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Uncle Vic <address@[EM  2008-03-27 03:44:31 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 23:57:31 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"adman" <725  2008-03-27 08:30:43 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-24 23:02:11 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Robibnikoff" &  2008-03-24 19:06:52 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 16:32:14 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-25 03:09:02 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 21:37:04 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-25 23:09:55 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 16:43:28 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-27 00:42:02 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 18:16:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-28 00:10:24 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:04:59 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-24 20:15:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:27:14 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-24 21:16:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
SeppoP <seppo_pietikai  2008-03-25 10:09:31 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 09:52:38 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 05:45:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 06:23:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 06:34:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 06:55:01 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 18:37:42 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 16:54:58 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 20:07:05 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 18:12:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 18:37:07 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 16:55:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 20:09:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"adman" <725  2008-03-25 20:22:14 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 20:29:57 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 21:29:29 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 22:06:29 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 22:28:26 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 23:19:51 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 01:57:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-25 22:44:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 08:06:06 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-25 22:41:53 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-25 22:40:47 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-27 00:47:16 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 18:36:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 02:00:30 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 21:53:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 09:33:36 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 18:06:04 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:05:22 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 08:19:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 09:42:26 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 19:01:36 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 16:48:21 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 21:11:20 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 14:31:57 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 17:51:02 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 15:00:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 18:07:11 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 15:27:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"M.M. Martinson"  2008-03-26 15:11:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 18:04:51 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:04:16 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 20:18:25 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:37:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 20:58:09 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 09:23:44 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-27 20:56:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
FeezeSpray <cold@[EMAI  2008-03-27 23:39:41 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-27 22:19:14 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-27 20:54:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-27 14:32:19 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-28 00:25:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-28 12:50:28 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Basilik359 <red@[EMAIL  2008-03-28 21:26:09 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism - "Basilik359" another J
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-28 17:34:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-28 17:36:20 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 18:42:00 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 20:58:43 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-26 23:16:17 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-25 22:37:40 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-25 22:33:48 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Robibnikoff" &  2008-03-25 05:20:52 
Re: Evolution, JABBERS SLAPPED DOWN BY ANOTHER WOMAN!!!!!!!!!!
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-25 22:48:53 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 16:13:30 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-25 13:30:24 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 21:53:03 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-24 22:05:06 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 09:49:29 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"adman" <725  2008-03-24 20:12:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-24 21:36:34 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Robibnikoff" &  2008-03-25 05:19:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 16:01:30 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 22:14:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 23:21:25 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Johannson"  2008-03-25 22:52:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-26 06:52:08 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-25 22:26:42 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-03-25 00:13:44 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:10:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-03-25 09:46:20 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-25 22:54:36 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-26 03:46:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 15:24:43 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 08:21:45 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 15:28:24 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 13:47:36 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 16:20:26 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Trigger <scope@[EMAIL   2008-03-26 21:38:22 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (JABBERS slapped down ag
"Kathy C" <K  2008-03-26 19:42:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (JABBERS slapped down ag
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:31:55 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (JABBERS slapped down ag
"Kathy C" <K  2008-03-26 23:22:32 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 18:56:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Virgil <Virgil@[EMAIL   2008-03-24 17:25:22 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:12:03 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Painter"   2008-03-25 01:25:19 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:29:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-24 21:42:09 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 18:57:23 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 22:16:57 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 23:26:07 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 01:58:46 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 08:23:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 09:43:23 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 19:08:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 15:35:41 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 21:07:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 21:15:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (Jabbers slapped down ag
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 19:46:06 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (Jabbers slapped down ag
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:32:29 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (Jabbers slapped down ag
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 23:25:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-27 00:48:18 
The Bible Versus Evolution
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 21:20:16 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution Jabbers slapped down hard by wom
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-26 19:51:28 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution Jabbers slapped down hard by wom
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:33:32 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-26 23:07:37 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Libertarius <Libertari  2008-03-27 10:53:24 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-27 18:29:40 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Pastor Dave <ananias91  2008-03-27 21:11:03 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-28 17:40:55 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Pastor Dave <ananias91  2008-03-28 23:14:59 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"adman" <725  2008-03-29 20:49:57 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Jabriol" <A  2008-03-29 23:37:12 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-29 23:54:42 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
Pastor Dave <ananias91  2008-03-30 14:21:48 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 13:28:37 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
"Mike Painter"   2008-03-30 12:55:53 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
"David V." <  2008-03-30 20:50:07 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Mike Johannson"  2008-03-30 00:16:10 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 01:46:18 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 05:35:46 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-28 18:01:18 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-28 17:50:30 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 23:23:15 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-03-29 20:14:36 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Ips-switch <carolyngul  2008-03-29 21:51:11 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-29 20:13:17 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 19:26:56 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"adman" <725  2008-03-29 20:51:21 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 21:07:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 00:35:28 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Libertarius <Libertari  2008-03-28 19:02:15 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-03-30 17:00:13 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-03-28 11:26:53 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 01:49:13 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 05:37:05 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"adman" <725  2008-03-28 08:59:55 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-28 18:11:46 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Ron Dean" <  2008-03-29 06:38:24 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-29 10:58:07 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"adman" <725  2008-03-29 20:52:16 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 00:45:44 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-29 16:25:11 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-03-29 16:51:18 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-29 20:13:17 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 19:28:07 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-04-01 19:28:11 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-01 18:31:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-05 20:29:21 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-30 00:50:20 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-30 09:59:03 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-30 17:55:01 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-30 17:57:21 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-28 18:08:54 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 23:23:15 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-29 11:22:10 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-29 16:25:11 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 00:59:28 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-30 09:59:03 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 18:07:50 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-30 20:24:15 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 20:23:54 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-05 20:01:32 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-04-08 17:23:48 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-08 21:57:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-08 22:47:16 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-09 13:01:51 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-09 18:57:20 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-09 18:25:35 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 00:42:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-09 21:18:34 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 01:33:13 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-10 05:57:34 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 13:37:19 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-04-10 17:17:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-25 16:11:58 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-25 17:19:30 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Cory Albrecht <coryalb  2008-04-25 22:51:18 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Dave Oldridge <doldrid  2008-04-26 03:37:43 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-26 09:58:58 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-26 10:31:23 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Cory Albrecht <coryalb  2008-04-26 11:47:38 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-29 23:08:46 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-26 00:51:37 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-04-12 20:11:25 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-07 13:35:30 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Ron Dean" <  2008-03-28 12:43:25 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 13:16:21 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-28 18:24:10 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 20:42:04 
Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be acc
Rhino <blue@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-29 02:15:48 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 22:22:47 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 10:39:55 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-29 00:01:00 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 11:24:42 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 23:22:39 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 12:04:01 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 00:11:19 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 12:52:37 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Michael Gray <mikegray  2008-03-29 19:44:59 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 17:03:53 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 08:52:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-30 08:26:38 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 21:05:40 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-30 10:04:09 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 00:07:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-30 12:57:08 
Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would i
Ye Old One <usenet@[EM  2008-03-30 14:38:17 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-30 11:39:56 
Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would i
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 14:11:31 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 13:24:05 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 16:08:18 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 15:25:19 
Re: Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--wou
Ye Old One <usenet@[EM  2008-03-30 19:45:47 
Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would i
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-30 18:31:27 
Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would i
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-31 11:17:50 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 13:14:23 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 15:57:33 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-31 09:27:12 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-30 03:36:03 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-03-30 07:59:33 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-30 18:14:12 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Fulcrum <Me@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-30 23:17:25 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-30 20:04:08 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-03-30 20:17:04 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Killiam <killiam@[EMAI  2008-03-31 00:31:47 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 20:26:57 
NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible: her
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-31 09:22:09 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
"M.M. Martinson"  2008-03-30 21:48:36 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
Precision <"carol  2008-03-31 09:31:23 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-31 11:04:26 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
Precision <"carol  2008-03-31 09:29:11 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 12:45:11 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 08:00:44 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-04-01 21:38:23 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-02 09:15:17 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Disrupt <cutnpieces@[E  2008-04-02 09:45:13 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-04-01 19:38:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: TROLL ALERT: "Fulcrum = Jabriol"
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 19:47:53 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: TROLL ALERT: "Fulcrum = Jabriol"
Budikka666 <budikka1@[  2008-03-31 00:53:23 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: TROLL ALERT: ""Budikka666" = Jab
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 20:28:48 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 21:46:33 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-03-30 07:48:05 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 15:44:42 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 14:58:57 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 20:37:34 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 19:51:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Budikka666 <budikka1@[  2008-03-31 00:55:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
SeppoP <seppo_pietikai  2008-03-31 11:42:41 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"adman" <725  2008-03-31 05:57:05 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-31 11:17:31 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-30 18:15:26 
All these Carolyn Gulley Sock puppet Plonk them all!!!!!!
Precision <"carol  2008-03-31 01:19:10 
Re: All these Antonio L Santana Sock puppets Plonk them all!!!!!
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 21:52:15 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 21:22:37 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-30 19:35:47 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 21:21:22 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-30 18:35:58 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 21:23:16 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-31 10:53:38 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 13:10:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 07:21:18 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 23:23:14 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 11:03:53 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 00:53:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 12:09:51 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 15:08:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 14:13:36 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-02 06:38:07 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"John \"C\"  2008-04-01 19:20:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 21:52:01 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-02 09:49:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 23:05:38 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-02 10:35:59 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-02 14:38:19 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-03 08:23:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-04-02 18:50:22 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-03 10:16:15 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-04-03 01:26:19 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-03 17:07:06 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-04-03 18:03:26 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-03 22:18:21 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-04 06:27:59 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-04-03 18:14:01 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-04 09:52:20 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-31 18:54:15 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 07:33:58 
Re: Science sup****t the Bi