Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Jehovahs Witness > Re: The Bible V...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 478 of 815 Topic 17485 of 18102
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Bible Versus Evolution: Fairy Tales vs. Facts

by Libertarius <Libertarius@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 14, 2008 at 12:17 PM

The fable in the Bible describes how an ET (YHWH ELOHIM)
sculpted all life out of mud and made them alive by blowing
air into their noses.

Intelligent people look at Nature instead of ancient fables
and recognize how life evolves throughout the Universe.

(FROM THE ARTICLE:)
'The Rev. Jose Gabriel Funes, the Jesuit director of the Vatican 
Observatory, was quoted as saying the vastness of the universe means it 
is possible there could be other forms of life outside Earth, even 
intelligent ones.
"How can we rule out that life may have developed elsewhere?" Funes 
said. "Just as we consider earthly creatures as 'a brother,' and 
'sister,' why should we not talk about an 'extraterrestrial brother'? It 
would still be part of creation."
In the interview by the Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano, Funes 
said that such a notion "doesn't contradict our faith" because aliens 
would still be God's creatures. Ruling out the existence of aliens would 
be like "putting limits" on God's creative freedom, he said.
The interview, headlined "The extraterrestrial is my brother," covered a 
variety of topics including the relation****p between the Roman Catholic 
Church and science, and the theological implications of the existence of 
alien life.
Funes said science, especially astronomy, does not contradict religion, 
touching on a theme of Pope Benedict XVI, who has made exploring the 
relation****p between faith and reason a key aspect of his papacy.
The Bible "is not a science book," Funes said, adding that he believes 
the Big Bang theory is the most "reasonable" explanation for the 
creation of the universe. The theory says the universe began billions of 
years ago in the explosion of a single, super-dense point that contained 
all matter.'
SEE:
http://tinyurl.
com/53mjnx


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**
 




 815 Posts in Topic:
Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Randall Witkowski <Ran  2008-03-24 22:07:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Painter"   2008-03-24 22:18:17 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism = Randall Witkowski = JA
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-24 17:26:58 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 15:30:46 
Flaws in =?windows-1252?Q?=93Scientific_Creationism=94?=
Randall Witkowski <Ran  2008-03-24 22:36:46 
Re: Flaws in “Scientific Creationism”
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-24 19:09:05 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 16:40:21 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 21:07:43 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
Michael Gray <mikegray  2008-03-26 12:08:31 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 02:13:19 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-25 22:15:46 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-25 22:14:29 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-28 08:33:51 
Re: Flaws in ?Scientific Creationism?
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-30 07:48:18 
Re: Flaws in “Scientific Creationism”
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-03-24 19:10:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Randall Witkowski <Ran  2008-03-24 22:38:31 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Robibnikoff" &  2008-03-24 18:46:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 15:55:00 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-03-25 00:05:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 16:37:15 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-03-25 00:43:15 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 17:04:30 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Chicken Little Jr <chi  2008-03-24 22:07:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-24 19:27:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-24 22:33:16 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 20:11:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Uncle Vic <address@[EM  2008-03-25 04:16:02 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 21:42:20 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-25 12:08:47 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Painter"   2008-03-25 05:11:48 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-25 12:38:00 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-25 03:25:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@[EM  2008-03-25 13:59:08 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Uncle Vic <address@[EM  2008-03-27 03:48:06 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Johannson"  2008-03-25 13:33:19 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 14:57:55 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-25 18:22:05 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-25 22:24:23 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 05:29:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 05:39:32 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 05:49:47 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 06:19:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 06:28:21 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 06:43:10 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 06:46:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 07:02:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Uncle Vic <address@[EM  2008-03-27 03:44:31 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 23:57:31 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"adman" <725  2008-03-27 08:30:43 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-24 23:02:11 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Robibnikoff" &  2008-03-24 19:06:52 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 16:32:14 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-25 03:09:02 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-24 21:37:04 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-25 23:09:55 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 16:43:28 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-27 00:42:02 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 18:16:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-28 00:10:24 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:04:59 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-24 20:15:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:27:14 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-24 21:16:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
SeppoP <seppo_pietikai  2008-03-25 10:09:31 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 09:52:38 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 05:45:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 06:23:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-03-25 06:34:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 06:55:01 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 18:37:42 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 16:54:58 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 20:07:05 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 18:12:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 18:37:07 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-25 16:55:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 20:09:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"adman" <725  2008-03-25 20:22:14 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 20:29:57 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 21:29:29 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 22:06:29 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 22:28:26 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 23:19:51 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 01:57:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-25 22:44:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 08:06:06 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-25 22:41:53 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-25 22:40:47 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Smiler" <Sm  2008-03-27 00:47:16 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 18:36:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 02:00:30 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-25 21:53:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 09:33:36 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 18:06:04 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:05:22 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 08:19:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 09:42:26 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 19:01:36 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 16:48:21 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 21:11:20 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 14:31:57 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 17:51:02 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 15:00:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 18:07:11 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 15:27:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"M.M. Martinson"  2008-03-26 15:11:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 18:04:51 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:04:16 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 20:18:25 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:37:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 20:58:09 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 09:23:44 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-27 20:56:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
FeezeSpray <cold@[EMAI  2008-03-27 23:39:41 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-27 22:19:14 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-27 20:54:56 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-27 14:32:19 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-28 00:25:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-28 12:50:28 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Basilik359 <red@[EMAIL  2008-03-28 21:26:09 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism - "Basilik359" another J
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-28 17:34:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-28 17:36:20 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 18:42:00 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-26 20:58:43 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-26 23:16:17 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-25 22:37:40 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-25 22:33:48 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Robibnikoff" &  2008-03-25 05:20:52 
Re: Evolution, JABBERS SLAPPED DOWN BY ANOTHER WOMAN!!!!!!!!!!
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-25 22:48:53 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 16:13:30 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-25 13:30:24 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 21:53:03 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-24 22:05:06 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 09:49:29 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"adman" <725  2008-03-24 20:12:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-24 21:36:34 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Robibnikoff" &  2008-03-25 05:19:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 16:01:30 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 22:14:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 23:21:25 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Johannson"  2008-03-25 22:52:18 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-26 06:52:08 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-25 22:26:42 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-03-25 00:13:44 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:10:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-03-25 09:46:20 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-25 22:54:36 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-26 03:46:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 15:24:43 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 08:21:45 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 15:28:24 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-26 13:47:36 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 16:20:26 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Trigger <scope@[EMAIL   2008-03-26 21:38:22 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (JABBERS slapped down ag
"Kathy C" <K  2008-03-26 19:42:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (JABBERS slapped down ag
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:31:55 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (JABBERS slapped down ag
"Kathy C" <K  2008-03-26 23:22:32 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 18:56:39 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Virgil <Virgil@[EMAIL   2008-03-24 17:25:22 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:12:03 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Mike Painter"   2008-03-25 01:25:19 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 01:29:54 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-24 21:42:09 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 18:57:23 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 22:16:57 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-25 23:26:07 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 01:58:46 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 08:23:35 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 09:43:23 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 19:08:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 15:35:41 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-26 21:07:33 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 21:15:50 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (Jabbers slapped down ag
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 19:46:06 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (Jabbers slapped down ag
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:32:29 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism (Jabbers slapped down ag
"Ips-Switch" &l  2008-03-26 23:25:27 
Re: Evolution, Creation, or Creationism
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-03-27 00:48:18 
The Bible Versus Evolution
Vizard <breaker@[EMAIL  2008-03-26 21:20:16 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution Jabbers slapped down hard by wom
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-26 19:51:28 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution Jabbers slapped down hard by wom
whizbang <scope@[EMAIL  2008-03-27 01:33:32 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-26 23:07:37 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Libertarius <Libertari  2008-03-27 10:53:24 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-27 18:29:40 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Pastor Dave <ananias91  2008-03-27 21:11:03 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-28 17:40:55 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Pastor Dave <ananias91  2008-03-28 23:14:59 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"adman" <725  2008-03-29 20:49:57 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Jabriol" <A  2008-03-29 23:37:12 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-29 23:54:42 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
Pastor Dave <ananias91  2008-03-30 14:21:48 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 13:28:37 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
"Mike Painter"   2008-03-30 12:55:53 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution - Dave's version
"David V." <  2008-03-30 20:50:07 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Mike Johannson"  2008-03-30 00:16:10 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 01:46:18 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 05:35:46 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-28 18:01:18 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-28 17:50:30 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 23:23:15 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-03-29 20:14:36 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Ips-switch <carolyngul  2008-03-29 21:51:11 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-29 20:13:17 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 19:26:56 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"adman" <725  2008-03-29 20:51:21 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 21:07:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 00:35:28 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Libertarius <Libertari  2008-03-28 19:02:15 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-03-30 17:00:13 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-03-28 11:26:53 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 01:49:13 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 05:37:05 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"adman" <725  2008-03-28 08:59:55 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-28 18:11:46 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Ron Dean" <  2008-03-29 06:38:24 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-29 10:58:07 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"adman" <725  2008-03-29 20:52:16 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 00:45:44 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-29 16:25:11 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-03-29 16:51:18 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-29 20:13:17 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 19:28:07 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-04-01 19:28:11 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-01 18:31:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-05 20:29:21 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-30 00:50:20 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-30 09:59:03 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-30 17:55:01 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-30 17:57:21 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-28 18:08:54 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 23:23:15 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-29 11:22:10 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-29 16:25:11 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 00:59:28 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-30 09:59:03 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 18:07:50 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-30 20:24:15 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
=?iso-8859-1?B?fiBT5GJs6y  2008-03-30 20:23:54 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-05 20:01:32 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-04-08 17:23:48 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-08 21:57:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-08 22:47:16 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-09 13:01:51 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-09 18:57:20 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-09 18:25:35 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 00:42:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-09 21:18:34 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 01:33:13 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-10 05:57:34 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 13:37:19 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-04-10 17:17:45 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-25 16:11:58 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-25 17:19:30 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Cory Albrecht <coryalb  2008-04-25 22:51:18 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Dave Oldridge <doldrid  2008-04-26 03:37:43 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-26 09:58:58 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-26 10:31:23 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Cory Albrecht <coryalb  2008-04-26 11:47:38 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-04-29 23:08:46 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
Elmer <nylicens@[EMAIL  2008-04-26 00:51:37 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution & demands of fundies
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-04-12 20:11:25 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Barry OGrady <god_free  2008-05-07 13:35:30 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"Ron Dean" <  2008-03-28 12:43:25 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Gabriel <gabriel_bapti  2008-03-28 13:16:21 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
"John Q. Citizen&quo  2008-03-28 18:24:10 
Re: The Bible Versus Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 20:42:04 
Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be acc
Rhino <blue@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-29 02:15:48 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 22:22:47 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 10:39:55 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-29 00:01:00 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 11:24:42 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-28 23:22:39 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 12:04:01 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 00:11:19 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 12:52:37 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Michael Gray <mikegray  2008-03-29 19:44:59 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-29 17:03:53 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 08:52:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-30 08:26:38 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-29 21:05:40 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-30 10:04:09 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 00:07:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-30 12:57:08 
Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would i
Ye Old One <usenet@[EM  2008-03-30 14:38:17 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-30 11:39:56 
Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would i
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 14:11:31 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 13:24:05 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 16:08:18 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 15:25:19 
Re: Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--wou
Ye Old One <usenet@[EM  2008-03-30 19:45:47 
Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would i
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-30 18:31:27 
Re: Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would i
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-31 11:17:50 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 13:14:23 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 15:57:33 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-31 09:27:12 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-30 03:36:03 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-03-30 07:59:33 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-30 18:14:12 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Fulcrum <Me@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-30 23:17:25 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-03-30 20:04:08 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-03-30 20:17:04 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Killiam <killiam@[EMAI  2008-03-31 00:31:47 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 20:26:57 
NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible: her
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-31 09:22:09 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
"M.M. Martinson"  2008-03-30 21:48:36 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
Precision <"carol  2008-03-31 09:31:23 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-31 11:04:26 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
Precision <"carol  2008-03-31 09:29:11 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 12:45:11 
Re: NOMINATION: Golden Krillfile (Re: Science sup****t the Bible:
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 08:00:44 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
John Baker <nunya@[EMA  2008-04-01 21:38:23 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-02 09:15:17 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Disrupt <cutnpieces@[E  2008-04-02 09:45:13 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-04-01 19:38:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: TROLL ALERT: "Fulcrum = Jabriol"
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 19:47:53 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: TROLL ALERT: "Fulcrum = Jabriol"
Budikka666 <budikka1@[  2008-03-31 00:53:23 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: TROLL ALERT: ""Budikka666" = Jab
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 20:28:48 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 21:46:33 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-03-30 07:48:05 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 15:44:42 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 14:58:57 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 20:37:34 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 19:51:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Budikka666 <budikka1@[  2008-03-31 00:55:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
SeppoP <seppo_pietikai  2008-03-31 11:42:41 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"adman" <725  2008-03-31 05:57:05 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Killiam" <k  2008-03-31 11:17:31 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-30 18:15:26 
All these Carolyn Gulley Sock puppet Plonk them all!!!!!!
Precision <"carol  2008-03-31 01:19:10 
Re: All these Antonio L Santana Sock puppets Plonk them all!!!!!
"Tony Santana Jr.&qu  2008-03-30 21:52:15 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 21:22:37 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-30 19:35:47 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-30 21:21:22 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-03-30 18:35:58 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-30 21:23:16 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-03-31 10:53:38 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 13:10:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 07:21:18 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 23:23:14 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 11:03:53 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 00:53:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 12:09:51 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 15:08:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 14:13:36 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-02 06:38:07 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"John \"C\"  2008-04-01 19:20:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 21:52:01 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-02 09:49:11 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-01 23:05:38 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-02 10:35:59 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-02 14:38:19 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-03 08:23:02 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-04-02 18:50:22 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-03 10:16:15 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-04-03 01:26:19 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-03 17:07:06 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-04-03 18:03:26 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-03 22:18:21 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-04 06:27:59 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"D. Ismay" <  2008-04-03 18:14:01 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-04 09:52:20 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-03-31 18:54:15 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 07:33:58 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kali <kali@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-31 23:00:49 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-04-01 10:15:47 
Re: Science sup****t the Bible: here is the evidence--would it be
Kal