Re: A Side-Effect of Religious Stupidity

"curtjester1" <curtjester1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:2ec3aa45-8f75-4428-bccd-61f5c7856cbc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 don't.  Of course gov't might.  It will always be an issue when
authority figures are involved.  God, family, individual, secular
gov't body, place of employment, the AMA.  They all have parameter and
somtimes human acts and issues intersect.  It will never end until
there is a dominate authority figure from the top.

* This is WTS bullcrap I was also taught by your cult.

JW's refrain from blood.  They bring out medical stats, and religious
scriptural backing to sup****t their positions.

* And happily watch their children and loved ones die while their JW
buddies 
pat them on the back telling them it's Jehovah's Will they suffer and die.

They all stand around feeling oh so righteous. Been there, seen it happen.

 It will always be the
blood transfusion would have saved the life by the AMA.  They say,
blood expanders are ample and good surgery saves lives, and blood
transfusions spread diseases, and cause more deaths than they even
come close to think that they save.

* More WTS propaganda bullcrap. Even some elders disagree and wish the WTS

would give up on the blood ban.

The best society has done so far
is to have hospitals to cater to the that specific belief and need.

Do I feel outraged at your example?  No.  People die from all sorts of
ways, and in ways not to life expectancy.  It's always been that way.
One can feel empathy and still maintain a neutral position.

CJ 

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**