"~saba*gracile~" <veronisc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:R_Gdnd_ODdw6fIrVnZ2dnUVZ_qmlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Tiktaalik" <corneliusjmchugh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i melding
>
news:32826999-aee1-4f21-98a2-826dc039bd17@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Apr 29, 9:56 pm, "~saba*gracile~" <veron...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Danwood" <d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i
>> meldingnews:fKuRj.144$_.96@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > "Kelsey Bjarnason" <kbjarna...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >news:450fe5-pg6.ln1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> [snips]
>>
>> >> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:26:53 +0200, ~saba*gracile~ wrote:
>>
>> >>> An alternative to evolution theory? Put the damn freud into the
>> >>> trashcan
>> >>> for starters, then we can start talking science.
>>
>> >> You were asked for an alternative. One which works as well as
>> >> evolution,
>> >> makes as many validated predictions (or postdictions, as the case
may
>> >> be)
>> >> as evolution, and is sup****ted by as much evidence as evolution.
>>
>> > How does postdictions differ from 20/20 hindsight?
>>
>> >> It is wholly pointless to point at something - evolution, whatever -
>> >> and
>> >> scream how we need to replace it, unless one has something *better*
to
>> >> offer.
>>
>> > Why must something to replace evolution be presented. One should be
>> > able to falsify any argument or theory without offering an altenative
>> > to
>> > replace it.
>>
>> Because it's a religion, it's their TRUTH. Either one must shut up or
>> find
>> something else as an alternative, just like the Jehovahs Witnesses
>> demand.
>> It's not science, its just dogma.
>
> My karma just ran over your dogma.
>
> -->nice, dumbass. The JW's claims everyone who doesn't believe in their
> theories are idiots, the evolutionists play the same game.
>
Yes but the evolutionists have plenty of data in this group alone to prove
that their enemies are idiots.
Cj
|
