"Kelsey Bjarnason" <kbjarnason@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i melding
news:fu4ne5-2s8.ln1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [snips]
>
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:18:43 +0200, ~saba*gracile~ wrote:
>
>>> So, we've observed atoms first-hand? Electrons?
>>
>> Yes lying jerk, you know very well these things have been proven.
>
> Really. "Proven". By science, which on the whole simply does not deal
> in proof.
>
> You are so amusing when you try to claim you have any knowledge of
> anything beyond patty-cakes.
>
>> A
>> creature in one area of our unobservable history morphing into
something
>> else in another area of history has NOT been observed, not first-
>> second- or millionth' hand, or by any technical equipment. It's so far
>> ONLY IMAGINED.
>
> Only imagined? You mean like gods. Okay, good. Since such things seem
> to bother you, you obviously reject creationism, which is *entirely*
> based upon such things.
Wrong, not entirely. If I were to line the two up against each other and
be totally neutral,
which I am, I'd still hold a belief in planned creation. But the point
here is they're pretty
equal in rock hard evidence, only the frame of belief differ. But mine
*still* is ahead
if a computer was to sum up all the evidence, if one could.
>
> Oh, wait, you don't, because you're not bright enough to figure out
> you've just refuted your own stance.
>
> My, but you're funny when you pretend to be able to think.
>
eh
S
|
