On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:00:03 GMT, Kelsey Bjarnason
<kbjarnason@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
: [snips]
:
: On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:18:43 +0200, ~saba*gracile~ wrote:
:
: >> So, we've observed atoms first-hand? Electrons?
: >
: > Yes lying jerk, you know very well these things have been proven.
:
: Really. "Proven". By science, which on the whole simply does not deal
: in proof.
:
: You are so amusing when you try to claim you have any knowledge of
: anything beyond patty-cakes.
:
: > A
: > creature in one area of our unobservable history morphing into
something
: > else in another area of history has NOT been observed, not first-
: > second- or millionth' hand, or by any technical equipment. It's so far
: > ONLY IMAGINED.
:
: Only imagined? You mean like gods. Okay, good. Since such things seem
: to bother you, you obviously reject creationism, which is *entirely*
: based upon such things.
As is evolutionism. Beliefs on that which is not once observed,
not verifiable, not testable.
But what has been observed for the entire recorded history of the
human race, that the Bible even says, is that animals only
produce after their kind. And that's anyone has ever observed.
It's testable. It's verifiable. Much unlike evolutionism, which
is none of these things.
:
: Oh, wait, you don't, because you're not bright enough to figure out
: you've just refuted your own stance.
:
: My, but you're funny when you pretend to be able to think.
|
