On Apr 28, 11:31=A0pm, "~saba*gracile~" <veron...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Kelsey Bjarnason" <kbjarna...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i
meldingnews:450fe5-pg6.l=
n1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> > [snips]
>
> > On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:26:53 +0200, ~saba*gracile~ wrote:
>
> >> An alternative to evolution theory? Put the damn freud into the
trashca=
n
> >> for starters, then we can start talking science.
>
> > You were asked for an alternative. =A0One which works as well as
evoluti=
on,
> > makes as many validated predictions (or postdictions, as the case may
be=
)
> > as evolution, and is supported by as much evidence as evolution.
>
> > It is wholly pointless to point at something - evolution, whatever -
and=
> > scream how we need to replace it, unless one has something *better* to
> > offer.
>
> > So what's your better offering? =A0Got one? =A0No? =A0Fine, then we'll
s=
imply
> > discount you as a pointless, vapid source of white noise until you do
> > have something better to offer.
>
> We don't need to find an alternative to something that isn't really
> an alternative, just a hoax.
You couldn't find your fat, cellulite-riddled arse with both hands and
a mirror.
"I am in favour of animal rights as well as human rights. That is the
way of a whole human being." (Abraham Lincoln).
>
> S- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
