On Apr 26, 7:22=A0am, "~saba*gracile~" <veron...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Tiktaalik" <corneliusjmch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i
meldingnews:122083c9-2cf2-=
4815-add0-1c113b0773ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Apr 24, 1:35 pm, "arseman" <72...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> babbled:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Richard Anacker" <spam.q1.2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >news:1jdeux7uw7hlh.dlg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > | Sers Gabriel et all
> > |
> > | Gabriel schrieb:
> > |
> > | > The point is you were asked to show where it's ever been
> > | > _observed first hand_ (i.e., witnessed by human eyes) an
> > | > _animal_ producing another animal over generations (supposedly
> > | > by mutations and ac***ulation of small changes) that is
> > | > clearly no longer that type of animal. Animal, not insects, and
> > | > you can't even show it for insects.
> > |
> > | What is blue, asked the blind.
> > | This is blue answered the respondent.
> > | But no, argued the blind, this is not blue, you cannot see it, so
you
> > | cannot know that it's blue.
> > | But I can see it, I am not blind, this is blue.
> > | No, it isn't. I can't see it, so it is not.
> > | But you are blind - I am not. I can see that it's blue.
> > | No you can't. If I cannot, you can't either, nobody can.
> > |
> > | Gabriel, you are a farce, I would recommend that you go and learn
what=
all
> > | this things mean, you've been told in this thread - but then I
remembe=
r
> > | that you are learning-resistant. So, go and have a good time, maybe
go=
to
> > | a scientific group and show there how infantile you are, in an
*atheis=
t*
> > | group you are not more than a little pain in the arse.
> > |
> > | richie, bored by such an amount of bull****.
>
> > Richie, I love your condescending tone asking Gabriel to go learn what
a=
ll
> > things mean when in fact it is actually you that cannot see the color
bl=
ue.
>
> > Why cannot you answer this simple question? HAs any thing been
observed =
by a
> > man that has changed from one species to another? If you cannot, then
> > Gabriel is 100 percent correct.
>
> No he isn't arseboy. As you know full well.
>
> > There has been no observable evidence of
> > that kind of evolution.
>
> Or of grass growing.
>
> --->lol lol, that's the argument of the year ain't it?
Yes, it's Gibbering Gabriels. Next question please.
> Evolution is so slow
> it just didn't happen.
Obviously not in your case.
> Let's just say that, and be over with this mess.
Right. "That". Happy now?
"I care not much for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the
better for it". (Abraham Lincoln).
>
> lol.
> S- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
